Imipridones affect tumor bioenergetics and promote cell lineage differentiation in diffuse midline gliomas.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) are incurable childhood cancers. The imipridone ONC201 has shown early clinical efficacy in a subset of DMGs. However, the anticancer mechanisms of ONC201 and its derivative ONC206 have not been fully described in DMGs. METHODS: DMG models including primary human in vitro (n = 18) and in vivo (murine and zebrafish) models, and patient (n = 20) frozen and FFPE specimens were used. Drug-target engagement was evaluated using in silico ChemPLP and in vitro thermal shift assay. Drug toxicity and neurotoxicity were assessed in zebrafish models. Seahorse XF Cell Mito Stress Test, MitoSOX and TMRM assays, and electron microscopy imaging were used to assess metabolic signatures. Cell lineage differentiation and drug-altered pathways were defined using bulk and single-cell RNA-seq. RESULTS: ONC201 and ONC206 reduce viability of DMG cells in nM concentrations and extend survival of DMG PDX models (ONC201: 117 days, P = .01; ONC206: 113 days, P = .001). ONC206 is 10X more potent than ONC201 in vitro and combination treatment was the most efficacious at prolonging survival in vivo (125 days, P = .02). Thermal shift assay confirmed that both drugs bind to ClpP, with ONC206 exhibiting a higher binding affinity as assessed by in silico ChemPLP. ClpP activation by both drugs results in impaired tumor cell metabolism, mitochondrial damage, ROS production, activation of integrative stress response (ISR), and apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Strikingly, imipridone treatment triggered a lineage shift from a proliferative, oligodendrocyte precursor-like state to a mature, astrocyte-like state. CONCLUSION: Targeting mitochondrial metabolism and ISR activation effectively impairs DMG tumorigenicity. These results supported the initiation of two pediatric clinical trials (NCT05009992, NCT04732065).

Can Hemp Help? Low-THC Cannabis and Non-THC Cannabinoids for the Treatment of Cancer.

Cannabis has been used to relieve the symptoms of disease for thousands of years. However, social and political biases have limited effective interrogation of the potential benefits of cannabis and polarised public opinion. Further, the medicinal and clinical utility of cannabis is limited by the psychotropic side effects of ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9-THC). Evidence is emerging for the therapeutic benefits of cannabis in the treatment of neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, with potential efficacy as an analgesic and antiemetic for the management of cancer-related pain and treatment-related nausea and vomiting, respectively. An increasing number of preclinical studies have established that ∆9-THC can inhibit the growth and proliferation of cancerous cells through the modulation of cannabinoid receptors (CB1R and CB2R), but clinical confirmation remains lacking. In parallel, the anti-cancer properties of non-THC cannabinoids, such as cannabidiol (CBD), are linked to the modulation of non-CB1R/CB2R G-protein-coupled receptors, neurotransmitter receptors, and ligand-regulated transcription factors, which together modulate oncogenic signalling and redox homeostasis. Additional evidence has also demonstrated the anti-inflammatory properties of cannabinoids, and this may prove relevant in the context of peritumoural oedema and the tumour immune microenvironment. This review aims to document the emerging mechanisms of anti-cancer actions of non-THC cannabinoids.