Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
3.
Clin Radiol ; 53(8): 612-4, 1998 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9744590

RESUMO

This study was performed to compare the patient acceptability and the efficacy of two different agents for bowel preparation prior to double contrast barium enema. One-hundred and ninety-four outpatients were randomized to have either two sachets of Picolax or two bottles of Fleet Phospho-soda and restricted to clear fluids on the day prior to their examination. Patients answered a short questionnaire before their enema. The decubitus films were assessed for faecal residue and bowel coating by three observers blinded to the type of preparation used. There was no significant difference in faecal residue nor in the bowel coating between the preparations. However patients found Picolax significantly easier to take, being better tasting and provoking less nausea and vomiting than Fleet Phospho-soda.


Assuntos
Catárticos , Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Enema , Fosfatos , Picolinas , Idoso , Sulfato de Bário , Catárticos/efeitos adversos , Citratos , Fezes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Compostos Organometálicos , Satisfação do Paciente , Fosfatos/efeitos adversos , Picolinas/efeitos adversos , Radiografia , Método Simples-Cego
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA