Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Urol ; 208(5): 1007-1017, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35930793

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Indications for germline testing in prostate cancer patients have expanded substantially over the past decade. With a near-universal shortage of genetic counselors and increasing demand, increased access to genetic counseling is crucial. We sought to prospectively implement and assess a clinician-led approach to genetic counseling and testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with metastatic or localized prostate cancer meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network® criteria for consideration of genetic testing were offered pre-test genetic counseling by their urologist or medical oncologist as part of their routine clinical care and concurrently approached for enrollment in the Germline Genetics in Prostate Cancer Study. Consented patients filled out a post-counseling survey using validated instruments to assess the quality of counseling. For patients who elected to undergo genetic testing, an additional validated questionnaire was completed following disclosure of results. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients undergoing testing, with a target >60% of patients. The secondary outcome was overall satisfaction with counseling, with a target >85% of patients. RESULTS: A total of 275 patients enrolled, and 203 patients elected to undergo genetic testing. Post-counseling surveys were obtained from 265 patients, and post-genetic testing surveys were obtained from 132 patients. Patient satisfaction was high, with 98% of patients reporting being satisfied with the overall quality of pre-test counseling, and 74% of patients elected to undergo genetic testing. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the effectiveness of clinician-led genetic counseling in prostate cancer. With clinician training, this approach can be utilized to expand access to appropriate germline genetic testing.


Assuntos
Aconselhamento Genético , Neoplasias da Próstata , Aconselhamento Genético/métodos , Testes Genéticos , Células Germinativas , Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa , Humanos , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Satisfação Pessoal , Neoplasias da Próstata/genética , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia
2.
J Cancer Educ ; 31(3): 588-94, 2016 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26076657

RESUMO

While it is recognized that cancer treatment can contribute to problems in sexual function, much less is currently known about the specific sexual health concerns and information needs of cancer survivors. This study tested a new instrument to measure cancer survivors' sexual health concerns and needs for sexual information after cancer treatment. The Information on Sexual Health: Your Needs after Cancer (InSYNC), developed by a multidisciplinary team of experts, is a novel 12-item questionnaire to measure sexual health concerns and information needs of cancer survivors. We tested the measure with a sample of breast and prostate cancer survivors. A convenience sample of 114 cancer survivors (58 breast, 56 prostate) was enrolled. Results of the InSYNC questionnaire showed high levels of sexual concern among cancer survivors. Areas of concern differed by cancer type. Prostate cancer survivors were most concerned about being able to satisfy their partners (57 %) while breast cancer survivors were most concerned with changes in how their bodies worked sexually (46 %). Approximately 35 % of all cancer survivors wanted more information about sexual health. Sexual health concerns and unmet information needs are common among breast and prostate cancer survivors, varying in some aspects by type of cancer. Routine screening for sexual health concerns should be included in comprehensive cancer survivorship care to appropriately address health care needs. The InSYNC questionnaire is one tool that may help clinicians identify concerns facing their patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/psicologia , Sobreviventes de Câncer/psicologia , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Comportamento Sexual/psicologia , Saúde Sexual , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Apoio Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Surg Innov ; 20(6): 625-30, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23592732

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To assess trends in the use of sacral neuromodulation and to measure the magnitude of variation in its use across geographic regions. METHODS: We used the State Ambulatory Surgery Database (SASD) from 2002 to 2009 from Florida to identify patients implanted with a neuromodulator. Age- and gender-adjusted rates of implantation were calculated by year and by geographic region, defined by the Hospital Service Area. The coefficient of variation was estimated to quantify the magnitude of variation for different time periods. RESULTS: Adjusted rates of sacral neuromodulation increased significantly from 1.1 per 100,000 population in 2002 to 10.4 per 100,000 population in 2009. The majority of cases were performed for overactive bladder. There was a very large amount of geographic variation in rates of these procedures as evidenced by the high coefficients of variation: 1.67 (2002 and 2003), 1.70 (2004 and 2005), 1.49 (2006 and 2007), and 1.05 (2008 and 2009). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of sacral neuromodulation have increased dramatically over the past decade. However, these rates of utilization are highly variable across regions, with some regions performing large numbers of these procedures and other regions performing few to no procedures. This range in practice patterns may reflect medical uncertainty surrounding the role of this procedure.


Assuntos
Terapia por Estimulação Elétrica/métodos , Próteses e Implantes , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Eletrodos Implantados , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sacro/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinária Hiperativa/cirurgia , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Urol ; 190(3): 903-8, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23538242

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Photoselective vaporization of the prostate has become an increasingly popular option for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, delayed bleeding has been raised as a potential issue as more cases are performed. We characterize delayed bleeding after photoselective vaporization of the prostate and identify associated risk factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We defined delayed gross hematuria as any complaint of hematuria following hospital discharge, and further stratified it as delayed gross hematuria requiring emergency department evaluation, hospital admission, continuous bladder irrigation, transfusions or reoperation. We performed an explicit chart review of 290 patients who underwent photoselective vaporization of the prostate at a single center from 2002 through 2009. Exposures of interest included age, prostate volume, followup duration, operative factors (watts/joules), and use of oral anticoagulation therapy or 5α-reductase inhibitors. RESULTS: Delayed gross hematuria occurred in 33.8% of patients during an average followup of 33 months. For 8.5% of patients the bleeding was severe enough to prompt presentation to the emergency department. For 4.8% of patients hospitalization was required and for 4.5% reoperation was required. Multivariate analysis revealed that the odds of bleeding increased with prostate size (OR 1.08, 1.03-1.14), longer followup (OR 1.35, 1.12-1.62) and anticoagulant use (OR 3.35, 1.43-7.83), and decreased with increasing age (OR 0.71, 0.51-0.98) and use of a 5α-reductase inhibitor (OR 0.41, 0.24-0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed hematuria occurs commonly after photoselective vaporization of the prostate but severe hematuria is rare. Larger prostate size, longer followup and use of anticoagulation were associated with a higher risk of delayed gross hematuria while preoperative 5α-reductase inhibitor use and older age were protective.


Assuntos
Hematúria/etiologia , Terapia a Laser/efeitos adversos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirurgia , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Intervalos de Confiança , Seguimentos , Hematúria/epidemiologia , Hematúria/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/fisiopatologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Hiperplasia Prostática/diagnóstico , Reoperação/métodos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores de Tempo , Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
Urology ; 77(4): 825-830.e1, 2011 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21256539

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the contemporary use of oral-targeted therapies (ie, sunitinib, sorafenib) among patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and to assess the factors associated with short-term and sequential treatment. METHODS: We used an administrative claims database of privately insured patients to evaluate oral-targeted therapy use among patients with RCC from 2006 to 2007. After identifying patients with RCC who had received sunitinib and/or sorafenib, we determined the prevalence of patients treated with short-term and/or sequential therapy. We performed bivariate and multivariate analyses to estimate the associations between the patient characteristics and receipt of short-term and/or sequential treatment regimens. RESULTS: We identified 938 patients with RCC who had initially been treated with sunitinib (n = 554) or sorafenib (n = 384). In this group, 36% and 23% of patients had received short-term or sequential therapy, respectively. Most patients (61%) who had received sequential therapy had undergone short-term treatment with ≥1 drugs, with second-line sorafenib more likely to be given as short-term therapy than sunitinib (63% vs 34%, P < .001). Short-term therapy was more common in female patients (odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval 1.12-2.09) and patients in the Southern United States (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.05-2.80). Sequential therapy was more common among patients receiving sorafenib first (odds ratio 2.30, 95% confidence interval 1.64-3.21). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term and sequential oral targeted therapy use was relatively prevalent among patients with RCC. For patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib, the patterns of short-term use varied by the sequence of medications, suggesting differences in the effectiveness or tolerability of each regimen. These findings highlight the need for future studies to characterize the "real-world" clinical outcomes and economic effect associated with these treatment courses.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Benzenossulfonatos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Administração Oral , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Benzenossulfonatos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compostos de Fenilureia , Piridinas/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Sorafenibe , Sunitinibe , Adulto Jovem
6.
J Clin Oncol ; 26(22): 3735-42, 2008 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18669460

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The commencement of quality-improvement initiatives such as Pay for Performance and the Physician Consortium for Performance Improvement has underscored calls to evaluate the quality of cancer care on a patient level for nationally representative samples. METHODS: We sampled early-stage prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 2000 through 2001 from the American College of Surgeons National Cancer Data Base and explicitly reviewed medical records from 2,775 men (weighted total = 55,160 cases) treated with radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy. We determined compliance with 29 quality-of-care disease-specific structure and process indicators developed by RAND, stratified by race, geographic region, and hospital type. RESULTS: Overall compliance exceeded 70% for structural and pretherapy disease assessment indicators but was lower for documentation of pretreatment functioning (46.4% to 78.4%), surgical pathology (37.1% to 86.3%), radiation technique (62.6% to 88.3%), and follow-up (55%). Geographic variations were observed as higher compliance in the South Atlantic division than the New England division for having at least one board-certified urologist (odds ratio [OR], 9.2; 95% CI, 1.9 to 45.0), at least one board-certified radiation oncologist (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 1.2 to 9.0), use of Gleason grading (OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2 to 13.8), and administering total radiation dose >or= 70 Gy (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.1). Teaching/research hospitals and Comprehensive Cancer Centers had higher compliance than Community Cancer Centers, whereas racial differences were not observed for any indicator. CONCLUSION: The significant and unwarranted variations observed for these quality indicators by census division and hospital type illustrate the inconsistencies in prostate cancer care and represent potential targets for quality improvement. The lack of racial disparities suggests equity in care once a patient initiates treatment.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Prostatectomia/normas , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde/normas , Adenocarcinoma/etnologia , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/radioterapia , Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Benchmarking , Institutos de Câncer , Centros Comunitários de Saúde , Fidelidade a Diretrizes , Hospitais de Ensino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Patologia Cirúrgica/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Neoplasias da Próstata/etnologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Radioterapia/normas , Características de Residência , Estados Unidos
7.
Urology ; 64(1): 117-22, 2004 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15245947

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify the preoperative patient, treatment, and surgeon factors associated with the administration of homologous blood transfusion during or after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) to be able to better inform patients regarding the probability of transfusion. Homologous blood transfusion is sometimes required during or after RRP, but predictive models for estimating transfusion probability using patient and surgical characteristics are lacking. METHODS: Data were prospectively collected regarding patient characteristics, cancer severity, surgeon experience, anesthetic used, operative blood loss, and transfusion among 1123 consecutive RRP cases. Multivariate regression analysis identified baseline factors associated with a homologous transfusion requirement and generated a model for predicting the likelihood of perioperative homologous transfusion. RESULTS: Homologous transfusion was administered in 3.8% of subjects; the mean estimated blood loss was 953 mL. Multivariable regression analysis identified prostate size (P <0.0001, odds ratio [OR] 1.74), use of general anesthesia (P = 0.01, OR 2.22), use of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (P = 0.006, OR 3.35), and surgeon expertise (P <0.0001, OR 8.63) as independent risk factors associated with a need for perioperative homologous transfusion. The most influential factor, surgical expertise, clustered among surgeons who performed more than 15 RRPs annually, because these surgeons had lower transfusion rates and lower estimated blood loss more consistently than did surgeons who performed fewer RRPs annually. CONCLUSIONS: Larger prostate size, use of general anesthesia, use of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, and annual surgeon case volume were independently associated with an increased probability that an individual patient would receive homologous transfusion during or after RRP. A nomogram indicating the probability of homologous transfusion based on these factors provides a benchmark of expected homologous transfusion rates according to individual patient and treatment parameters.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Nomogramas , Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Anestesia/métodos , Anestesia/estatística & dados numéricos , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Transfusão de Sangue Autóloga/estatística & dados numéricos , Competência Clínica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Tamanho do Órgão , Probabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA