Prevention of thalidomide- and lenalidomide-associated thrombosis in myeloma.

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is more than 1 per thousand annually in the general population and increases further in cancer patients. The risk of VTE is higher in multiple myeloma (MM) patients who receive thalidomide or lenalidomide, especially in combination with dexamethasone or chemotherapy. Various VTE prophylaxis strategies, such as low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin or aspirin, have been investigated in small, uncontrolled clinical studies. This manuscript summarizes the available evidence and recommends a prophylaxis strategy according to a risk-assessment model. Individual risk factors for thrombosis associated with thalidomide/lenalidomide-based therapy include age, history of VTE, central venous catheter, comorbidities (infections, diabetes, cardiac disease), immobilization, surgery and inherited thrombophilia. Myeloma-related risk factors include diagnosis and hyperviscosity. VTE is very high in patients who receive high-dose dexamethasone, doxorubicin or multiagent chemotherapy in combination with thalidomide or lenalidomide, but not with bortezomib. The panel recommends aspirin for patients with < or = 1 risk factor for VTE. LMWH (equivalent to enoxaparin 40 mg per day) is recommended for those with two or more individual/myeloma-related risk factors. LMWH is also recommended for all patients receiving concurrent high-dose dexamethasone or doxorubicin. Full-dose warfarin targeting a therapeutic INR of 2-3 is an alternative to LMWH, although there are limited data in the literature with this strategy. In the absence of clear data from randomized studies as a foundation for recommendations, many of the following proposed strategies are the results of common sense or derive from the extrapolation of data from many studies not specifically designed to answer these questions. Further investigation is needed to define the best VTE prophylaxis.

Human myeloma in vitro colony growth: interrelationships between drug sensitivity, cell kinetics, and patient survival duration.

Ninety-seven patients with multiple myeloma evaluated serially had both a tritiated thymidine labeling index of bone marrow plasma cells (LI%) and in vitro myeloma stem cell culture performed. Thirty-three patients with myeloma colony growth had in vitro drug sensitivity testing carried out, 18 having in addition in vitro thymidine suicide determinations. The LI% and the likelihood of in vitro myeloma colony growth were highly correlated: the higher the LI%, the more likely was colony or cluster growth (p less than 0.001). The tritiated thymidine suicide of myeloma stem cells was usually very high. There was excellent correlation between in vitro and in vivo drug sensitivity. Both pretreatment drug resistance and selective sensitivity (e.g., interferon, bisantrene, methotrexate, vinblastine) at the time of relapse were accurately detected and correlated well with survival duration (p = 0.01 Wilcoxan). Although LI% and in vitro sensitivity were clearly independent variables, a high LI% (greater than 3%) plus in vitro resistance were associated with a subsequent survival duration of less than 6 mo. The studies allowed dissection of the complex interrelationship between cell kinetics and drug sensitivity.

Cell kinetic analysis of human tumor stem cells.

The application of the tumor stem cell assay to the study of human tumor cell kinetics has the potential for major advances in our knowledge of proliferative characteristics of clonogenic human tumor cells. From simultaneous evaluation of in vitro drug sensitivity, in vitro doubling time, and the thymidine suicide index, plus flow cytometry, cytogenetic analysis, and assessment of differentiation markers, substantial insights into the basic biology of tumor cell growth may be attained. As discussed in other chapters, using modifications of the two-layer system, one can assess both local cell-mediated and humoral factors that might influence in vitro kinetics and drug sensitivity. The next few years should see the acquisition and integration of valuable new information that should allow more rational approaches to the treatment of tumors by taking full advantage of information on both kinetics and drug sensitivity of clonogenic human tumor cells.