Association of busulfan exposure with survival and toxicity after haemopoietic cell transplantation in children and young adults: a multicentre, retrospective cohort analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous busulfan combined with therapeutic drug monitoring to guide dosing improves outcomes after allogeneic haemopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). The best method to estimate busulfan exposure and optimum exposure in children or young adults remains unclear. We therefore assessed three approaches to estimate intravenous busulfan exposure (expressed as cumulative area under the curve [AUC]) and associated busulfan AUC with clinical outcomes in children or young adults undergoing allogeneic HCT. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, patients from 15 centres in the Netherlands, USA, Canada, Switzerland, UK, Italy, Germany, and Australia who received a busulfan-based conditioning regimen between March 18, 2001, and Feb 12, 2015, were included. Cumulative AUC was calculated by numerical integration using non-linear mixed effect modelling (AUCNONMEM), non-compartmental analysis (AUC from 0 to infinity [AUC0-∞] and to the next dose [AUC0-τ]), and by individual centres using various approaches (AUCcentre). The main outcome of interest was event-free survival. Other outcomes of interest were graft failure or relapse, or both; transplantation-related mortality; acute toxicity (veno-occlusive disease or acute graft versus-host disease [GvHD]); chronic GvHD; overall survival; and chronic-GvHD-free event-free survival. We used propensity-score-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models, Weibull models, and Fine-Gray competing risk regressions for statistical analyses. FINDINGS: 790 patients were enrolled, 674 of whom were included: 274 (41%) with malignant and 400 (59%) with non-malignant disease. Median age was 4·5 years (IQR 1·4-10·7). The median busulfan AUCNONMEM was 74·4 mg × h/L (95% CI 31·1-104·6), which correlated with the standardised method AUC0-∞ (r2=0·74), but the latter correlated poorly with AUCcentre (r2=0·35). Estimated 2-year event-free survival was 69·7% (95% CI 66·2-73·0). Event-free survival at 2 years was 77·0% (95% CI 72·1-82·9) in the 257 patients with an optimum intravenous busulfan AUC of 78-101 mg × h/L compared with 66·1% (60·9-71·4) in the 235 patients at the low historical target of 58-86 mg × h/L and 49·5% (29·2-66·0) in the 44 patients with a high (>101 mg × h/L) busulfan AUC (p=0·011). Compared with the low AUC group, graft failure or relapse occurred less frequently in the optimum AUC group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·57, 95% CI 0·39-0·84; p=0·0041). Acute toxicity (HR 1·69, 1·12-2·57; p=0·013) and transplantation-related mortality (2·99, 1·82-4·92; p<0·0001) were significantly higher in the high AUC group (>101 mg × h/L) than in the low AUC group (<78 mg × h/L), independent of indication; no difference was noted between AUC groups for chronic GvHD (<78 mg × h/L vs ≥78 mg × h/L, HR 1·30, 95% CI 0·73-2·33; p=0·37). INTERPRETATION: Improved clinical outcomes are likely to be achieved by targeting the busulfan AUC to 78-101 mg × h/L using a new validated pharmacokinetic model for all indications. FUNDING: Research Allocation Program and the UCSF Helen Friller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Mt Zion Health Fund of the University of California, San Francisco.

Effects of hypothermia on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical studies.

Examples of clinical applications of therapeutic hypothermia in modern clinical medicine include traumatic cardiac arrest, ischaemic stroke and, more recently, acute perinatal asphyxia in neonates. The exact mechanism of (neuro)protection by hypothermia is unknown. Since most enzymatic processes exhibit temperature dependency, it can be expected that therapeutic hypothermia may cause alterations in both pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, which could result in an increased risk of drug toxicity or therapy failure. Generalizable knowledge about the effect of therapeutic hypothermia on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics could lead to more appropriate dosing and thereby prediction of clinical effects. This article reviews the evidence on the influence of therapeutic hypothermia on individual pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters. A literature search was conducted within the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases from January 1965 to September 2008, comparing pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic parameters in hypothermia and normothermia regarding preclinical (animal) and clinical (human) studies. During hypothermia, pharmacokinetic parameters alter, resulting in drug and metabolite accumulation in the plasma for the majority of drugs. Impaired clearance is the most striking effect. Based on impaired clearance, dosages should be decreased considerably, especially for drugs with a low therapeutic index. Hypothetically, high-clearance compounds are affected more than low-clearance compounds because of the additional effect of impaired hepatic blood flow. The volume of distribution also changes, which may lead to therapy failure when it increases and could lead to toxicity when it decreases. The pH-partitioning hypothesis could contribute to the changes in the volumes of distribution for weak bases and acids, depending on their acid dissociation constants and acid-base status. Pharmacodynamic parameters may also alter, depending on the hypothermic regimen, drug target location, pharmacological mechanism and metabolic pathway of inactivation. The pharmacological response changes when target sensitivity alters. Rewarming patients to normothermia can also result in toxicity or therapy failure. The integrated effect of hypothermia on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of individual drugs is unclear. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring is currently considered essential for drugs with a low therapeutic index, drugs with active metabolites, high-clearance compounds and drugs that are inactivated by enzymes at the site of effect. Because most of the studies (74%) included in this review contain preclinical data, clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies are essential for the development of substantiated dose regimens to avoid toxicity and therapy failure in patients treated with hypothermia.