RESUMO
The treatment of soft tissue sarcoma is clinically challenging. Referral to an experienced center with an interdisciplinary team is strongly recommended. Neoadjuvant therapy, including irradiation and chemotherapy, has been applied to improve local control rates, eradicate micrometastases and assess chemosensitivity. However, the role of neoadjuvant therapy remains controversial, especially for systemic therapy, as the only available randomized trial failed to prove a benefit for survival. Nevertheless, on the basis of the current body of literature, neoadjuvant therapy can be considered on an individual basis for patients with high-risk tumors. Whenever possible, patients should be included in a clinical trial.
Assuntos
Terapia Neoadjuvante , Sarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Sarcoma/radioterapia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/radioterapia , Quimioterapia do Câncer por Perfusão Regional , Terapia Combinada , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Hipertermia Induzida , Prognóstico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Retroperitoneais/cirurgia , Sarcoma/mortalidade , Sarcoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Tecidos Moles/cirurgiaRESUMO
We present a case report of a successful high-dose melphalan therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation without the use of allogeneic blood product support in a 70-year-old patient suffering from multiple myeloma. Based on the experience in this case and thorough evaluation of the literature, we consider pre-transplant Hb level of 11-12 g/dl, platelet count higher than 70/nl, good WHO performance status of two and lower and informed consent as important eligibility criteria. During cytopenia recommended supportive measures include growth factor support with erythropoietin and G-CSF, p.o. iron treatment as well as prophylactic use of anti-fibrinloytic agents. Furthermore we discuss additional options that might be considered depending on the individual factors as e.g. pre-transplant collection and cryoconservation of autologous platelet concentrates. Moreover, an analysis of socio-economic issues regarding this procedure is presented. We conclude that allogeneic blood product free transplantation is a feasible procedure that can be offered to the patients belonging to distinct religious groups refusing allogeneic blood products as Jehovás Witnesses and patients presenting other contraindications for transfusions.
Assuntos
Testemunhas de Jeová , Mieloma Múltiplo/terapia , Transplante de Células-Tronco de Sangue Periférico , Condicionamento Pré-Transplante , Idoso , Criopreservação , Humanos , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiplo/tratamento farmacológico , Plaquetoferese , Indução de Remissão , Transplante AutólogoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Hepatic impairment resulting from the use of conventional drugs is widely acknowledged, but there is less awareness of the potential hepatotoxicity of herbal preparations and other botanicals, many of which are believed to be harmless and are commonly used for self-medication without supervision. The aim of this paper is to examine the evidence for hepatotoxicity of botanicals and draw conclusions regarding their pathology, safety and applications. DESIGN: Current literature on the hepatotoxicity of herbal drugs and other botanicals is reviewed. The aetiology, clinical picture and treatment of mushroom (Amanita) poisoning are described. RESULTS: Hepatotoxic effects have been reported for some Chinese herbal medicines (such as Jin Bu Huan, Ma-Huang and Sho-saiko-to), pyrrolizidine alkaloid-containing plants, germander (Teucrium chamaedrys), chaparral (Larrea tridentata), Atractylis gummifera, Callilepsis laureola, and others. The frequency with which botanicals cause hepatic damage is unclear. There is a lack of controlled treatment trials and the few studies published to date do not clarify the incidence of adverse effects. Many plant products do not seem to lead to toxic effects in everyone taking them, and they commonly lack a strict dose-dependency. For some products, such as Sho-saiko-to, the picture is confused further by demonstrations of hepatoprotective properties for some components. Mushroom poisoning is mostly due to the accidental consumption of Amanita species. Treatment with silymarin, thioctic acid, penicillin and liver transplantation have been shown to be effective but require early diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Severe liver injury, including acute and chronic abnormalities and even cirrhotic transformation and liver failure, has been described after the ingestion of a wide range of herbal products and other botanical ingredients, such as mushrooms. It is concluded that in certain situations herbal products may be just as harmful as conventional drugs.
Assuntos
Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/etiologia , Medicamentos de Ervas Chinesas/efeitos adversos , Plantas Medicinais/efeitos adversos , Amanita , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/patologia , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas/terapia , Humanos , Fígado/patologia , Intoxicação Alimentar por Cogumelos/etiologia , Intoxicação Alimentar por Cogumelos/patologia , Intoxicação Alimentar por Cogumelos/terapia , Segurança , Xenobióticos/efeitos adversosRESUMO
It was the objective of this study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of an empirical antibiotic therapy consisting in ceftazidime and a glycopeptide antibiotic. All patients enrolled in the study had hematological malignancies and underwent high-dose therapy with peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) support. In this retrospective study, 183 of 207 patients who had received a PBSC-supported high-dose therapy were evaluable. Any patients who had fever higher than 38.5 degrees C received ceftazidime in combination with vancomycin (105 patients) or teicoplanin (69 patients). In 80 of 174 patients with fever (45%) the fever resolved within 72 h as a result of the treatment with ceftazidime and the glycopeptide antibiotic. In nonresponding patients, the changes included the replacement of ceftazidime by imipenem/cilastin (94 patients) and the addition of erythromycin (12 patients) or metronidazole (3 patients). Amphotericin B was administered in 29 patients. Following hematological reconstitution, the fever and clinical signs, including radiographic findings, resolved in 20 primarily nonresponding patients. In blood cultures, a significantly higher incidence of gram-positive than of gram-negative bacteria was observed (26 vs 7). The toxicity of the first-line antibiotic therapy was limited to allergic skin reactions in 12 patients. Ceftazidime in combination with a glycopeptide antibiotic provides an effective and safe first-line therapy for patients with neutropenic fever following PBSC-supported high-dose therapy.