Systemic Sclerosis Patients Experiencing Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program: The Beneficial Effect on Their Psychological Status and Quality of Life.

Psychological concerns in Systemic Sclerosis (SSc) patients represent an important issue and should be addressed through non-pharmacological treatments. Thus, the aim of the present study was to assess the effects of the Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) program on psychological variables and the perspectives and experiences of patients with an SSc diagnosis. Notably, 32 SSc patients were enrolled and assigned to either the intervention (MBSR) group or the waitlist group. Inclusion criteria were (i) age ≥ 18 years, SSc diagnosis according to EULAR/ACR diagnostic criteria and informed consent. Exclusion criteria were previous participation in any Mind-Body Therapy or psychiatric diagnosis. Quantitative and qualitative outcomes were investigated through clinometric questionnaires and individual interviews. MBSR did not significantly impact outcomes such as physical functionality, anxiety, hopelessness, depression, physical health status, perceived stress, mindfulness and mental health status. For the anger evaluation, statistically significant differences are found for both controlling and expressing anger, indicating that the MBSR program had a favorable impact. As for qualitative results, more awareness of daily activities, stress reduction in terms of recognizing the causes and implementing self-strategies to prevent them, adherence to therapy, and recognition of the effect of medication on their bodies were reported. In conclusion, it is important to highlight the absence of negative or side effects of the MBSR program and the positive impact on patients' experience and perspective; thus, we suggest this approach should be taken into account for SSc patients.

Nursing interventions for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases on biological therapies: a systematic literature review.

Investigating unmet needs and identifying the necessary interventions for patients affected by rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) may help significantly to ensure the continuity and quality of the chronic care pathway. To this aim, the contribution of rheumatology nurses requires further evidence. The aim of our systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify the nursing interventions directed towards patients with RMDs undergoing biological therapy. To retrieve data, a search was carried out in the MEDLINE database, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL database), the APA PsycINFO database and the Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) from 1990 to 2022. The systematic review was carried out in accordance with the relevant PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (I) adult patients with RMDs, (II) undergoing therapy with Biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs), (III) original and quantitative research papers in English with available abstract, (IV) specific to nursing interventions and/or outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened the identified records for eligibility according to their title and abstract, full texts were subsequently assessed and, finally, data was extracted. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools were used to evaluate the quality of the studies included. Among the 2348 records retrieved, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. These consisted of six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one pilot study and six observational studies on RMDs. In a total population of 2004 patients, 43% (862/2004) of the cases concerned rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 56% (1122/2004) of the cases concerned spondyloarthritis (SpA). Three major nursing interventions were identified, namely education, patient-centred care and data collection/nurse monitoring, which were correlated with high satisfaction rates regarding care, increased self-care capacity and treatment adherence among patients. All interventions followed a protocol defined in collaboration with rheumatologists. The large degree of heterogeneity in the interventions did not allow the performance of a meta-analysis. Rheumatology nurses are part of a multidisciplinary team caring for patients with RMDs. Following an accurate initial nursing evaluation, rheumatology nurses can plan and standardise their interventions focusing primarily on patient education and personalised care based on actual needs, such as psychological well-being and disease control. However, the training for rheumatology nurses should define and standardise, as much as possible, the competencies required for the detection of disease parameters. Key Points • This SLR provides an overview of nursing interventions for patients with RMDs. • This SLR considers the specific population of patients on biological therapies. • Training for rheumatology nurses should standardise, as much as possible, the knowledge and methods required for detecting disease parameters. • This SLR highlights the various competencies of rheumatology nurses.

Efficacy of rehabilitation with Tai Ji Quan in an Italian cohort of patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia Syndrome (FMS) is characterized by musculoskeletal pain, muscle tenderness leading to disability, impaired quality of life (QoL), fatigue and it is accompanied by sleep disorders and psychological distress. Mind body therapies (MBT), such as Tai Ji Quan (TJQ), use different techniques to facilitate the ability of the mind to influence disease characteristics and symptoms. Some studies showed that TJQ, in patients with rheumatic diseases, particularly FMS, improved QoL, disability and psychological distress. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of TJQ on disability, QoL, fatigue, sleep and psychological distress in an Italian cohort of FMS patients. METHODS: We enrolled 44 FMS patients: 22 patients (Experimental Group) participated to a course of Tai Ji Quan style of (2/week for 16 weeks); 22 patients (Control Group) participated to an educational course about FMS (2/week for 16 weeks). At baseline (T0) and at the end of treatment (T1), patients were assessed for disability [Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)], Quality of Life [Short-Form 36 (SF36)], fatigue [Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness-Fatigue (FACIT-F)], pain [Widespread Pain Index (WPI)], tenderness [Tender Points (TP)], Sleep Quality [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)] and mood disorders [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)]. RESULTS: At T1 versus T0, patients of the Experimental Group showed a significant improvement in FIQ, FACIT, SF36 (Summary Physical Index, Physical activity, physical role, bodily pain, general health, vitality, emotional role limitations), in WPI, TP, PSQI (total, sleep duration, and sleep disturbance) and HADS (total score and anxiety subscale), while Patients in the Control Group did not improve in any parameter. CONCLUSIONS: In FMS patients TJQ, if performed by an expert physiotherapist, should be regarded as an effective rehabilitation method.