National Patterns of Early Adoption of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Guided Linear Accelerators in 2018 to 2019.

Purpose: Adaptive magnetic resonance imaging-guided linear accelerators (aMRI-LINACs) are an emerging technology with the potential to improve radiation treatment for cancer through improved visualization and adaptive treatment. Given the competing forces of the increased cost, knowledge, and staff required for aMRI-LINAC therapy, it is unpredictable how rapidly and for whom aMRI-LINAC therapy is being adopted. Therefore, given that aMRI-LINAC therapy was granted approval from the Food and Drug Administration in late 2017, we evaluated the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to obtain a nationwide view of early aMRI-LINAC adoption in 2018 to 2019. Methods and Materials: Forty-three disease sites were aggregated. A sample of patients who underwent intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) from 2018 to 2019 were matched 1:1 by stage for the top 4 cancer sites. We then compared 9 characteristics of interest (age, % White [vs non-White], % residing in metro areas, % living in the greatest income quartile, % insured by Medicare, % uninsured or unknown insurance status, % treated at a comprehensive cancer center or academic center, % with no recorded Charlson-Deyo comorbidities, and % residing in an area with highest educational) between the 2 samples (aMRI-LINAC and matched IMRT). Results: Only 171 patients were recorded as having been treated with aMRI-LINACs in the NCDB in 2018 to 2019. Fifty-six percent were male, 89% White, and 54% enrolled in Medicare. The most common sites of disease treated were lung (33 patients), pancreas (30 patients), prostate (29 patients), and breast (23 patients). There were no significant differences between aMRI-LINAC- and IMRT-matched patients except that patients with lung or breast cancer treated with aMRI-LINAC were significantly more likely to be treated at a comprehensive cancer center or academic center. Conclusions: aMRI-LINAC adoption recorded in the NCDB after Food and Drug Administration approval was potentially underreported, slow, and attributed to academic sites of practice. Further longitudinal study will be needed to assess how practice patterns evolve with greater adoption.

Relationships between expression of BCS1L, mitochondrial bioenergetics, and fatigue among patients with prostate cancer.

Introduction: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most debilitating symptom with the greatest adverse side effect on quality of life. The etiology of this symptom is still not understood. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between mitochondrial gene expression, mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, electron transport chain complex activity, and fatigue in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy (XRT), compared to patients on active surveillance (AS). Methods: The study used a matched case-control and repeated-measures research design. Fatigue was measured using the revised Piper Fatigue Scale from 52 patients with prostate cancer. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, electron-transport chain enzymatic activity, and BCS1L gene expression were determined using patients' peripheral mononuclear cells. Data were collected at three time points and analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Results: The fatigue score was significantly different over time between patients undergoing XRT and AS (P<0.05). Patients undergoing XRT experienced significantly increased fatigue at day 21 and day 42 of XRT (P<0.01). Downregulated mitochondrial gene (BC1, ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase, synthesis-like, BCS1L, P<0.05) expression, decreased OXPHOS-complex III oxidation (P<0.05), and reduced activity of complex III were observed over time in patients with XRT. Moreover, increased fatigue was significantly associated with downregulated BCS1L and decreased complex III oxidation in patients undergoing XRT. Conclusion: Our results suggest that BCS1L and complex III in mitochondrial mononuclear cells are potential biomarkers and feasible therapeutic targets for acute XRT-induced fatigue in this clinical population.

Four-year outcomes of hypofractionated high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost in prostate cancer allows dose escalation and delivery of higher biologically effective dose (BED). We evaluated the outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and HDR boost in a community setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between July 2003 and April 2008, 148 patients with prostate cancer were treated at Cancer Center of Irvine using two transperineal implants performed 1 week apart (22Gy delivered in four fractions divided between two insertions and delivered twice daily), followed by IMRT (50.4Gy). Hormonal therapy was given for 1 year to all patients with Gleason score of 8 or higher. RESULTS: Patient characteristics are as follows: median age at treatment, 71 years; American Joint Committee on Cancer Group IIB, 53%; Gleason score of 7, 41%; and Gleason score of 8 or higher, 14%. Median followup was 49 months, and median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir was 0.15ng/mL. The 4-year actuarial biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was 96.8/81% by Phoenix/PSA lower than 0.5ng/mL criteria. According to National Comprehensive Cancer Center Clinical Practice Guidelines-defined recurrence risk groups, 4-year bDFS for low risk was 100/92.9%, intermediate risk was 100/86.7%, and high risk was 94/75.4% by Phoenix/PSA lower than 0.5ng/mL criteria. No statistically significant difference in bDFS was detected by either failure criteria based on risk group, lymph node risk, or initial PSA. Treatment was well tolerated. Subacute/late genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities were limited to 10% and 5%, respectively of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate IMRT plus HDR brachytherapy boost was well tolerated with appropriate PSA response and bDFS at 4 years, demonstrated in a community setting. This treatment schema provides a high BED, comparable with hypofractionated prostate regimens previously reported in the literature. Higher BED delivery should be explored in further dose escalation studies.

Ten-year outcomes: the clinical utility of single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography capromab pendetide (Prostascint) in a cohort diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical utility of capromab pendetide imaging with single photon emission computed tomography coregistration with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) in primary prostate cancer (CaP) for pretreatment prognostic staging and localization of biologic target volumes (BTV) for individualized image-guided radiotherapy dose escalation (IGRT-DE). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients consecutively presenting for primary radiotherapy (February 1997 to December 2002), having a clinical diagnosis of localized CaP, were evaluated for tumor stage using conventional staging and SPECT/CT (N=239). Distant metastatic uptake (mets) were identified by SPECT/CT in 22 (9.2%). None of the suspected mets could be clinically confirmed. Thus, all subjects were followed without alteration in disease management. The SPECT/CT pelvic images defined BTV for IGRT-DE (+150% brachytherapy dose) without (n=150) or with (n=89) external radiation of 45 Gy. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria defined risk groups (RG). The median survivor follow-up was 7 years. Biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS) was reported by clinical nadir +2 ng/mL (CN+2) criteria. Statistical analyses included Kaplan-Meier, multivariate analysis, and Concordance-index models. RESULTS: At 10-year analyses, overall survival was 84.8% and bDFS was 84.6%. With stratification by RG, CN+2 bDFS was 93.5% for the low-RG (n=116), 78.7% for the intermediate-RG (n=94), and 68.8% for the high-RG (n=29), p=0.0002. With stratification by pretreatment SPECT/CT findings, bDFS was 65.5% in patients with suspected mets (n=22) vs. 86.6% in patients with only localized uptake (n=217), p=0.0014. CaP disease-specific survival (DSS) was 97.7% for the cohort. With stratification by SPECT/CT findings, DSS was 86.4% (with suspected mets) vs. 99.0% (localized only), p=0.0001. Using multivariate analysis, the DSS hazard ratio for SPECT/CT findings (mets vs. localized) was 3.58 (p=0.0026). Concordance-index tests, based on all data, by CN+2 bDFS criteria were 0.710 for RG alone and 0.773 for SPECT/CT + RG. CONCLUSIONS: Through long-term outcomes we demonstrate statistically significant bDFS and DSS predictive value for pretreatment capromab pendetide SPECT/CT imaging in primary CaP. Dual clinical utility is demonstrated, using SPECT/CT to define BTV for individualized IGRT-DE.