RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Physical therapy is regarded an effective treatment for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Patients with TMD often report concomitant headache. There is, however, no overview of the effect of physical therapy for TMD on concomitant headache complaints. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the literature on the effectiveness of physical therapy on concomitant headache pain intensity in patients with TMD. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Cochrane and PEDro were searched. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized or controlled clinical trials studying physical therapy interventions were included. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with TMD and headache. APPRAISAL: The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess risk of bias. SYNTHESIS METHODS: Individual and pooled between-group effect sizes were calculated according to the standardized mean difference (SMD) and the quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: and manual therapy on both orofacial region and cervical spine. There is a very low level of certainty that TMD-treatment is effective on headache pain intensity, downgraded by high risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision. LIMITATIONS: The methodological quality of most included articles was poor, and the interventions included were very different. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapy interventions presented small effect on reducing headache pain intensity on subjects with TMD, with low level of certainty. More studies of higher methodological quality are needed so better conclusions could be taken.
Assuntos
Manipulações Musculoesqueléticas , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular , Vértebras Cervicais , Cefaleia/terapia , Humanos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/complicações , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Non-randomised studies have suggested beneficial effects of bisphosphonates in osteogenesis imperfecta. We assessed the effects of oral olpadronate in children with this disorder in a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: 34 children recruited from the Dutch national centre for osteogenesis imperfecta were randomly assigned olpadronate (10 mg/m2 daily; n=16) or placebo (n=18) for 2 years. All children also received calcium and vitamin D supplements. Primary endpoints were incident fractures of long bones and changes in bone mineral content (BMC), bone mineral density (BMD), and functional outcome. Anthropometry, vertebral height, and urinary markers of bone resorption were also studied. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Fracture follow-up was complete for all the children, including two who withdrew from the study (one from each group). Olpadronate treatment was associated with a 31% reduction in relative risk of fracture of long bones (hazard ratio 0.69 [95% CI 0.52-0.91], p=0.01). The olpadronate group showed significantly greater increases than the placebo group in spinal BMC (difference between groups 2.24 g/year [0.20-4.29], p=0.03) and spinal BMD (difference between groups 0.054 g/cm2 per year [0.012-0.096], p=0.01). There were no detectable effects on functional outcome, anthropometrics, or vertebral height and no differences between the groups in changes in urinary markers of bone resorption. INTERPRETATION: Oral treatment with olpadronate at a daily dose of 10 mg/m2 results in a reduction of fracture risk of long bones in children with osteogenesis imperfecta. However, the issue of whether bisphosphonates will alter the natural course of osteogenesis imperfecta remains unresolved, and further studies are needed.