The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiac Electrophysiology Training: A Survey Study.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in a significant decrease in volume of electrophysiology (EP) procedures. There has been concern that trainees may not achieve the procedural numbers required to graduate as independent electrophysiologists within the usual timeline. We sought to determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the percentage of clinical cardiac EP (CCEP) fellows in jeopardy of not meeting procedural volume requirements and overall sentiments regarding preparedness of fellows for independent practice. METHODS: We surveyed CCEP fellows and program directors about baseline procedural volumes, curriculum changes due to the pandemic, and attitudes about preparedness for board examinations and independent practice. RESULTS: Ninety-nine fellows and 27 program directors responded to the survey. Ninety-eight percent of responding fellows reported a decrease in procedural volume as a result of the pandemic. Program directors reported an overall decrease in annual number of ablations and device procedures performed by each fellow during the 2019-2020 academic year compared to the preceding year. Despite this, a minority of fellows and program directors reported concerns about meeting Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education procedural requirements for devices (9% and 4%, respectively) and ablation (19% and 9%) or preparedness for independent practice after a 2-year fellowship. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a decrease in procedural volume for CCEP trainees, but the majority of fellows and program directors do not anticipate major barriers to timely graduation. This may change with COVID-19 resurgence and further interruptions in training.

Downstream overdrive pacing and intracardiac concealed fusion to guide rapid identification of atrial tachycardia after atrial fibrillation ablation.

Aims: Atrial tachycardia (AT) related to atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation frequently poses a diagnostic challenge. Downstream overdrive pacing (DOP) can be used to rapidly detect reentry and assess proximity of a pacing site to an AT circuit or focus. We hypothesized that systematic DOP using multielectrode catheters would facilitate AT mapping. Methods and results: DOP identified constant fusion when the post-pacing interval (PPI)-tachycardia cycle length (TCL) <40 ms and stimulus to adjacent upstream atrial electrogram interval >75% of TCL. Mapping was performed as follows: (i) CS DOP, (ii) DOP at left atrial (LA) roof, (iii) DOP at selected LA sites based on prior DOP attempts, and (iv) mapping and ablation at regions of fractionated electrograms in region of AT. Activation mapping was performed at operator discretion. AT diagnosis was confirmed by successful ablation or additional mapping when ablation was unsuccessful. Fifty consecutive patients with sustained AT underwent mapping of 68 ATs, of whom 42 (62%) were macroreentrant, 19 were locally reentrant (28%), and 7 (10%) were focal. AT was correctly identified with a median of three DOP attempts. All macroreentrant ATs were identified with ≤6 DOP attempts. One AT (1.6%) was terminated by DOP, and three ATs (4.8%) required activation mapping. Intracardiac concealed fusion was seen in 26 ATs (38%), each of which was successfully ablated. Conclusion: Reentry could be demonstrated in a substantial majority of AF ablation-related AT. A stepwise diagnostic approach using DOP and recognition of intracardiac concealed fusion can be used to rapidly identify and ablate reentrant AT.