Local anaesthetic use for the iliac crest-donor site: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations.

During orthopaedic surgery of the limb, we performed a prospective, double blind controlled study on three parallel groups in 30 patients to evaluate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effect of infiltration of the iliac crest bone graft harvest site with 20 ml of bupivacaine (100 mg), ropivacaine (150 mg) or saline as control group (n = 10 in each group). Then, in a sheep model of iliac crest infiltration, we compared the pharmacokinetics of single administration of plain bupivacaine (100 mg) and bupivacaine (500 mg)-loaded microspheres. In the clinical control group, pain from the iliac crest was worse than pain from the primary surgical site. Pain from the iliac crest was significantly reduced during the first 12 postoperative hours in local anaesthetic groups compared to the control group. However, during this period, pain from the primary surgical site was increased compared to the control group. Finally, there was no difference between the three groups in the average intake of PCA morphine. There was no significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic difference between plain bupivacaine and ropivacaine. The maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) of ropivacaine and bupivacaine were 964 (282) ng ml(-1) and 638 (366) ng ml(-1), respectively. In the sheep model, it was clearly shown that the release of bupivacaine from microspheres was controlled and prolonged despite the largest dose of bupivacaine used (500 mg; n = 4). Wound infiltration of iliac crest harvest site with local anaesthetic is an easy technique for postoperative analgesia. However, this effect lasts only 12 hours without reducing the morphine consumption due to an increase of pain from the primary surgical site. The local anaesthetic infiltration produced a significant peak of plasma level, which could be dangerous if another infiltration or regional anaesthetic technique was associated with it. Experimentally, as a drug delivery system, the use of local anaesthetic-loaded microspheres could be an interesting alternative.

[Locoregional intravenous anesthesia]. / Anesthésie locorégionale intraveineuse.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse current data on intravenous regional anaesthesia (IVRA), its benefits and drawbacks. DATA SOURCES: Articles were obtained from a Medline search using the following search terms: 'intravenous regional anaesthesia', alone or combined with 'local anaesthetic agents', 'toxicity'. STUDY SELECTION: Following articles in English and in French have been selected: main articles, original articles, update and review articles, letters to the editor and recent editorials. DATA EXTRACTION: Physiopathological and pharmacological data were extracted for involved mechanisms and means for improving this technique. DATA SYNTHESIS: IVRA is a reliable and efficient technique with a lower cost than general anaesthesia and well adapted for limb surgery in the ambulatory patient. Depending on the site of the surgical field, the pneumatic tourniquet is set either on the arm, forearm or wrist for the upper limb or thigh, calf or ankle for the lower limb. When set in periphery, less local anaesthetic agent is required. A wide tourniquet requires a lower inflation pressure than a double cuff tourniquet. A single cuff is as efficient as a dual cuff if shape, size and inflating pressure are appropriate. The limb occlusion pressure (LOP) is the minimal pressure required to occlude blood flow. It is assessed with either a pulse oximeter or Doppler for determination of the lowest cuff inflating pressure. The cuff is inflated to 50 mmHg above LOP. Oozing in the surgical field can be decreased by the re-exsanguination technique. Currently, lidocaine is the only local anaesthetic released in France for IVRA. Addition of a muscle relaxant, a NSAID or clonidine allows the dose of local anaesthetic agent to be decreased and improves postoperative analgesia.