Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Medicinas Complementares
Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 14(6): e469-78, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19910232

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Brucellosis is the most prevalent bacterial zoonosis worldwide. In this study, we aimed to compare our 1028 brucellosis cases with other big series in the literature in view of epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory findings and therapeutic features. METHODS: A total of 1028 brucellosis cases admitted to the Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology over a 10-year period were included in the study. A retrospective analysis was undertaken and patient files were reviewed for history, clinical and laboratory findings, and therapeutic features, as well as complications. RESULTS: Of the 1028 patients, 539 (52.4%) were female and 489 (47.6%) were male. The mean age of patients was 33.7+/-16.34 years and 69.6% of cases were aged 13-44 years. Four hundred and thirty-five cases (42.3%) had a history of raising livestock and 55.2% of the cases were found to have no occupational risk for brucellosis. Six hundred and fifty-four of the cases (63.6%) had a history of raw milk and dairy products consumption. The most frequently seen symptoms were arthralgia (73.7%) and fever (72.2%), while the most common clinical findings were fever (28.8%) and hepatomegaly (20.6%). The most frequent laboratory finding was a high C-reactive protein level (58.4%). The standard tube agglutination (STA) test+Coombs STA test was positive in 1016 cases (98.8%). Focal involvement was present in 371 (36.1%) cases. The most frequent involvement was osteoarticular involvement with 260 cases (25.3%). The overall relapse rate for patients with brucellosis was 4.7%. The highest relapse rate, 8.5%, was observed in the group of patients with osteoarticular involvement. Regimens including doxycycline and streptomycin with or without rifampin appeared more effective than other regimens in osteoarticular involvement. CONCLUSIONS: In humans, brucellosis may lead to serious morbidity, and it continues to be a major health problem in Turkey. There is no recommended treatment protocol for complicated brucellosis. Large multicenter studies are needed to determine the most appropriate treatment choices and durations in complicated brucellosis.


Assuntos
Brucelose/complicações , Brucelose/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Artralgia/diagnóstico , Artralgia/microbiologia , Artrite/microbiologia , Doenças Ósseas/diagnóstico , Doenças Ósseas/microbiologia , Brucelose/tratamento farmacológico , Brucelose/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Laticínios/microbiologia , Feminino , Febre/diagnóstico , Febre/microbiologia , Hepatomegalia/diagnóstico , Hepatomegalia/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/microbiologia , Doenças Profissionais/epidemiologia , Doenças Profissionais/microbiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Turquia/epidemiologia
2.
Tohoku J Exp Med ; 201(4): 221-8, 2003 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14690014

RESUMO

Levamisole is an immunopotenciator drug which is used as an antihelmintic drug as well as very effective remedy on cellular immunity compared with humoral immunity. A total 71 patients (37 men, 34 women) who referred to our department between March 1997 and December 2001, with a history of the disease for about 1 year, were diagnosed as having chronic brucellosis through those tests brucella serum agglutination test (SAT), SAT with Coombs and SAT with 2-mercaptoethanol. The patients were randomly divided into levamisole group (36 patients) and control group (35 patients). All patients were given rifampicin 600 mg/day + doxycycline 200 mg/day for 6 weeks as a standard classical combined therapy for brucellosis. In the levamisole group, oral levamisole 80 mg every other day for 6 weeks was added to the treatment. There was a statistically significant difference between two groups, in complaints of arthralgia, fatigue and sweats before and 6 months after treatment, as well as in erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein elevations and lymphomonocytosis finding. While it was provided both clinical and serological improvement in all patients in the levamisole group; 11 patients in the control group did not improve both clinically and in view of specific and nonspecific laboratory findings and a recurrence occurred in one case, in this group. In conclusion, levamisole added to classical antibiotic therapy in treatment of chronic brucellosis was found quite efficient in all patients in providing adequate clinical and laboratory response in comparison to classical antibiotic therapy alone.


Assuntos
Brucelose/tratamento farmacológico , Levamisol/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Testes de Aglutinação , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibióticos Antituberculose/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Antibacterianos , Antinematódeos/administração & dosagem , Medula Óssea/metabolismo , Brucella melitensis/metabolismo , Terapia Combinada , Doxiciclina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Levamisol/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Mercaptoetanol/farmacologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rifampina/administração & dosagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA