Effect of Citric Acid Versus EDTA on Radiographic Root Development in Regenerative Endodontic Treatment: An Animal Study.

INTRODUCTION: Regenerative endodontic treatment was introduced with the aim of reinforcing the root and enabling further root development. In the process of dentin mineralization, bioactive molecules are entrapped in the dentin matrix, which can be released later by rinsing the dentin with chelating agents. This study aimed to compare the effects of citric acid and EDTA on radiographic root development in regenerative endodontic treatment in an animal model. METHODS: Premolars of 3 beagle dogs were used in this study. The teeth at 1 side of the jaw were irrigated with EDTA according to the regeneration protocol of the American Association of Endodontists. The teeth in the other quadrant were irrigated with citric acid in the second treatment session. Follow-up radiographs were obtained at 6 months, and the primary and final data were analyzed in SPSS Version 23 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY) using the analysis of covariance. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the 2 irrigating solutions regarding the increase in root length (P = .668); however, EDTA showed significantly superior efficacy in increasing the root dentin thickness compared with citric acid (P = .022). CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of this study, the use of citric acid versus EDTA was not superior on radiographic root development in regenerative endodontic treatment.

Effect of intraosseous injection versus inferior alveolar nerve block as primary pulpal anaesthesia of mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the success rate, effect on blood pressure, and pain of intraosseous injection (IO) and inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) for pulpal anaesthesia of mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis as the primary anaesthetic technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial (IRCT2013022712634N1) was conducted on 60 patients between 18 and 65 years suffering from symptomatic irreversible pulpitis of a mandibular posterior tooth. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group one received IO while group two received IANB with 3% mepivacaine. After anaesthetic injection, success rate of pulpal anaesthesia was assessed by pulp testing in the two groups. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures of patients were compared before and after the anaesthetic injections. Level of pain during injection was scored using a visual analogue scale. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 20, t-test and chi square test at p = .05 level of significance. RESULTS: Success rate of IO (56.7%) was significantly higher than that of IANB (23.3%) (p = .008). There was no significant difference in pain during anaesthetic injection (p = .304) or change in systolic (p = .80) and diastolic (p = .28) blood pressures following injection between the two techniques. CONCLUSIONS: IO had a higher success rate than IANB for pulpal anaesthesia of mandibular posterior teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. Neither technique provided profound pulpal anaesthesia.