Diffusion weighted imaging as a biomarker of retinoic acid induced myelomeningocele.

Neural tube defects are a common congenital anomaly involving incomplete closure of the spinal cord. Myelomeningocele (MMC) is a severe form in which there is complete exposure of neural tissue with a lack of skin, soft tissue, or bony covering to protect the spinal cord. The all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) induced rat model of (MMC) is a reproducible, cost-effective means of studying this disease; however, there are limited modalities to objectively quantify disease severity, or potential benefits from experimental therapies. We sought to determine the feasibility of detecting differences between MMC and wild type (WT) rat fetuses using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging techniques (MRI). Rat dams were gavage-fed ATRA to produce MMC defects in fetuses, which were surgically delivered prior to term. Average diffusion coefficient (ADC) and fractional anisotropy (FA) maps were obtained for each fetus. Brain volumes and two anatomically defined brain length measurements (D1 and D2) were significantly decreased in MMC compared to WT. Mean ADC signal was significantly increased in MMC compared to WT, but no difference was found for FA signal. In summary, ADC and brain measurements were significantly different between WT and MMC rat fetuses. ADC could be a useful complementary imaging biomarker to current histopathologic analysis of MMC models, and potentially expedite therapeutic research for this disease.

Regulatory toxicology perspectives on the development of botanical drug products in the United States.

Toxicological studies constitute an essential part of the effort in developing a botanical supplement into a drug product. The US Food and Drug Administration recently published a draft guidance and established a special botanical review team to assist academic and industry sponsors to manage this and other regulatory considerations related to this unique group of drug products. In this article, the current state of regulatory viewpoints on issues related to requirements and recommendations of various types of nonclinical toxicity studies in support of advanced phases clinical trials and filing a New Drug Application of a botanical are discussed. Topics include nonclinical pharmacology/toxicology view of previous human experience and initial clinical trial, regulatory perspectives on acute toxicity studies, chronic toxicity studies, mutagenicity studies, reproductive toxicity studies, and carcinogenicity studies on botanicals. Certain regulatory review-related issues are also presented. It is anticipated that through a proactive 2-way communication between the Agency and the sponsor, toxicological development of botanical drug product can be significantly facilitated.