Switch therapy with ciprofloxacin vs. intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with cirrhosis: similar efficacy at lower cost.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous administration of a third-generation cephalosporin is optimal antibiotic treatment for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. AIMS: To compare an intravenous-oral step-down schedule with ciprofloxacin (switch therapy) to intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and to evaluate the impact of terlipressin and albumin in the treatment of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome on mortality. METHODS: A total of 116 cirrhotic patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, were randomly given switch therapy with ciprofloxacin (61 patients) or intravenous ceftazidime (55 patients). All patients who developed type 1 hepatorenal syndrome were treated with terlipressin (2-12 mg/day) and albumin (20-40 g/day). RESULTS: Resolution of infection was achieved in 46/55 patients treated with ceftazidime (84%) and in 49/61 patients treated with ciprofloxacin (80%, P = N.S.). An intravenous-oral step-down schedule was possible in 50/61 patients (82%) who received ciprofloxacin; 45/61 patients (74%) were discharged before the end of antibiotic treatment and completed it at home. The mean saving per patient due to the reduction of hospital stay in the ciprofloxacin group was 1150 . Type 1 hepatorenal syndrome was treated successfully in 12/19 patients (63%). As a consequence, the in-hospital mortality rate due to infection was 10%. CONCLUSIONS: Switch therapy with cephalosporin is more cost-effective than intravenous ceftazidime in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients who are not on prophylaxis with quinolones.

Comparison between nifedipine and carvedilol in the treatment of de novo arterial hypertension after liver transplantation: preliminary results of a controlled clinical trial.

There is no controlled clinical trial on the treatment of de novo arterial hypertension after liver transplantation (LT) a common complication using calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) for immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nifedipine, a calcium channel blocker, and carvedilol, an alpha1- and beta-blocker. The study included 50 patients who developed arterial hypertension after LT. The data on the first 30 patients who have completed 12-month follow-up are reported herein. Eighteen patients received nifedipine, and 12 patients received carvedilol. Patients were evaluated monthly at the outpatient clinic for 1 year. If patients developed severe adverse effects to nifedipine, they were switched to carvedilol and vice versa (therapy failure). The two groups were similar for clinical features, indications for LT, immunosuppressive therapy, and baseline blood pressures. A failure of treatment was observed in 9 of 18 patients treated with nifedipine (50.0%) and one of 12 patients treated with carvedilol (8%, P < .025). Nifedipine was effective in 4 of 18 patients, carvedilol, in 4 of 12 patients (22.21% vs 33.3%, P = NS). Two of the nine nonresponders to nifedipine responded to carvedilol. The efficacy of monotherapy was observed in 11 of 40 randomized patients (27.5%). Carvedilol monotherapy is as effective as nifedipine but far better tolerated.