Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a herbal formulation for rheumatoid arthritis - A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a diverse disease characterized by a variable, progressive course of articular and extra-articular symptoms that are linked with pain, disability, and mortality. The exact cause of rheumatoid arthritis is still being investigated, and there is no cure for this debilitating, persistent, painful disease. Qurs-e-Mafasil, a herbal Unani preparation, is regarded as a potent treatment for Waja'al-Mafasil, a condition clinically similar to rheumatoid arthritis, but scientific evidence is scarce. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to assess the non-inferiority of Qurs-e-Mafasil compared to celecoxib in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on seventy patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis between the ages of 35 and 55 years. The participants were randomly allocated in a ratio of 3:2, with 42 participants in the test group and 28 participants in the control group. The test group was administered 2 tablets (each having 500 mg) of Qurs-e-Mafasil, while the control group was administered 1 capsule of Celecoxib 100 mg. Both medications were delivered for four weeks. The primary outcome measure was European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response criteria based on Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28) assessed before and after therapy, whereas the secondary outcome measure was the change in joint pain severity as determined by a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at baseline and each follow-up. The safety of the interventions was evaluated based on adverse event monitoring at each follow-up and laboratory tests including hemogram, Liver Function Tests (LFTs), Kidney Function Tests (KFTs), and a complete urine examination performed at baseline and after four weeks of treatment. RESULTS: The per-protocol analysis was done on 50 participants (30 in test group and 20 in control group) who completed the study duration. Thus, at the conclusion of the trial, participants in the test and control groups had either a moderate or no response based on EULAR response criteria. The odds ratio for no response versus moderate response between the test and the control groups was 0.71 (95% CI: 0.20-2.55) with p = 0.744. Moreover, the observed mean differences in VAS scores between the test and the control groups at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and final follow-up were -0.33 (95% CI: -6.65 to 5.99, p = 0.916), 0.50 (95% CI: -5.63 to 6.63, p = 0.870), 2.42 (95% CI: -2.95 to 7.78, p = 0.370), and 3.00 (95% CI: -1.82 to 7.84, p = 0.219), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The differences in primary and secondary outcomes between the two groups indicate that Qurs-e-Mafasil, a herbal Unani formulation containing Zingiber officinale Roscoe rhizome, Colchicum luteum Baker root, Piper nigrum L. fruit, and Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. root, is comparable to celecoxib in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Phytochemical investigation, antioxidant and anticancer activities of various Unani drugs.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the phytochemicals, antioxidant, and anticancer activities on MCF-7 human breast cancer cell line using aqueous, hydro-ethanol, and methanol extracts of different Unani drugs, e.g., Halela Siyah, Aftimoon, Bisfayej, Ustukhudoos, and Kutki. METHODS: The qualitative examination (alkaloids, terpenoids, tannins, and saponins), anticancer activity, and an antioxidant assay of the three different extracts were done by MTT assay and DPPH assay, respectively, using different Unani drugs. RESULTS: The qualitative examination confirmed the substantive presence of phytochemical constituents in all the extracts of these drugs. The Methanolic extract of Halela Siyah had the highest DPPH scavenging activity (91%), while Bisfayej had the lowest (58%). Similarly, the hydro-ethanolic extract showed approximately identical activity for Halela Siyah (89%), Aftimoon (88%), Bisfayej (84%), Kutki (82%), and Ustukhudoos (81%). The aqueous extracts of Halela Siyah (88%) had the highest DPPH scavenging activity, whereas Bisfayej (73%) had the lowest. The methanolic extract of Aftimoon demonstrated the greatest anticancer activity (IC50 - 108), while Aftimoon showed the least activity (IC50 - 316). Halela Siyah (IC50 - 175) and Aftimoon (IC50 - 178) showed substantially the same activity in aqueous extracts. Ustukhudoos hydro-ethanol extracts had the highest (IC50 - 130) activity, whereas Aftimoon had the lowest (IC50 - 204). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our findings evaluated the presence of phytochemicals, good antioxidant activity, and anticancer activity in different extracts of drugs used in this study. The study shows these drugs have potential anticancer activity against breast cancer in MCF-7 cell lines.

Assessing the efficacy and safety of Unani pharmacopoeial formulations in dermatophytosis (quba) - a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: The recent trends of rising unresponsive cases of dermatophytosis to conventional therapies pose a challenge in clinical practice. Unani medicine offers effective treatment for dermatophytosis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Unani herbo-mineral preparations Qurs-e-Asfar (QA) and Rogan-e-Narjeel (RN) in dermatophytosis. METHODS: This was a randomized, active-controlled and open-label clinical study. The participants diagnosed with dermatophytosis (n=78) randomized into treatment group (n=40) receiving oral QA (778 mg twice a day) and topical RN and control group (n=38) receiving oral Itraconazole (100 mg/day) and topical Terbinafine hydrochloride (1%) for 6 weeks. RESULTS: We found post-treatment improvement in itching by 86.3% vs. 78% (treatment vs. control group), erythema by 96.4% vs. 94.3%, scaling by 93% vs. 92.2% and peripheral raised margins by 82.3% vs. 81%. Furthermore, this study showed that the differences in the mean Total Signs and Symptoms Score (TSSS) and positive KOH mount were clinically and statistically significant (p<0.05) in both the groups. On comparing inter group, the differences in mean TSSS (p=0.07) and positive KOH mount (p=0.717) were found statistically insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: This study concludes that the formulations QA and RN were effective and safe in the treatment of dermatophytosis.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Unani Formulations in Pityriasis Versicolor: A randomized controlled trial.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: Pityriasis Versicolor (PV) is a commonly encountered infection of the skin caused by Malassezia species. Despite effective conventional antifungal drugs, the prevention and treatment of PV remain a challenge. The Unani pharmacopoeial preparations Itrifal Hakim Ali (IHA) and Habb-e-Kalaf (HK) have been used in the treatment of PV for a long time. The Unani practitioners recommend these formulations for the successful treatment of PV in clinical practice. AIM OF THE STUDY: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Unani formulations IHA (oral) and HK (topical) in the treatment of PV. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single centre, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group and open-label clinical study was carried out in the outpatient departments of the National Research Institute of Unani Medicine for Skin Disorders, Hyderabad, India. The participants diagnosed with PV of any gender aged between 18 and 60 years were randomized into the test group (n = 37) to receive oral IHA (10g/day) and topical HK and the active control group (n = 35) to receive oral Itraconazole (100 mg/day) and local Terbinafine (1%) for the period of 6 weeks. Of them, 30 participants in each group completed the duration of the protocol therapy. The outcome of this study was based on a per-protocol analysis of the data. The efficacy of the interventions was measured by post-treatment change in subjective clinical symptoms/signs, mean TSSS, IGA score, direct microscopy of fungal elements and DLQI. The dermal safety was assessed by Berger/Bowman Scoring Scale and systemic safety was evaluated by Urinalysis, haematological and biochemical parameters. RESULTS: This study observed statistically and clinically significant post-treatment reduction in itching (test group vs. active control group; 73.4% vs. 89.1%), hypopigmentation (63.2% vs. 57.1%), hyperpigmentation (60% vs. 65.5%), and scaling (91.6% vs. 92.7%) (p < 0.001). The differences in mean TSSS (5.4 ± 0.63 vs. 5.60 ± 0.32), IGA score (2.07 ± 0.15 vs. 1.74 ± 0.08) and DLQI (9.6 ± 2.06 vs. 9.04 ± 2.7) were also found clinically and statistically significant (p < 0.001) in each group when compared baseline data to post-treatment. On inter-group comparison, the changes in mean TSSS and DLQI were not found statistically significant at p < 0.05. But, the change in the mean IGA score was significant (p = 0.03). Further, the mycological cure was observed in 100% and 76.7% of participants in the test group and the control group respectively. On comparing inter-group the effects of the interventions on direct microscopy were found statistically significant (p = 0.034). In addition, no significant change in urinalysis, biochemical and haematological parameters from baseline to post-treatment in each group was observed. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that the test drugs (IHA and HK) were safe and effective in the treatment of PV. The oral (IHA) and local (HK) Unani formulations were tolerated well by all the participants The efficacy and safety of the IHA and HK were comparable to the standard drugs (Itraconazole and Terbinafine).