Effects of non-manipulative osteopathic management in addition to physical therapy and rehabilitation on clinical outcomes of ankylosing spondylitis patients: A preliminary randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) is reported to impair quality of life, physical and functional ability of patients. Rehabilitation and physical therapy is usually proposed to improve AS patient clinical conditions. Besides, an osteopathic management has not been extensively studied in the field of inflammatory diseases. = OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of osteopathic approach in addition to conventional rehabilitation management on clinical and functional outcomes among patients with AS. EQUIPMENT AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with AS were recruited to participate to a physical therapy and rehabilitation (PTR) program over an 18-week period. They were randomly allocated into two groups to complete PTR only or PTR combined with osteopathic management without manipulative techniques (OSTEO group). Thoracolumbar maximal isometric strength (for flexion, extension, lateroflexion, and axial rotation) and flexibility, functional index, pain intensity and quality of life (self-assessment questionnaires) were assessed before and after the protocol. RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed for the OSTEO group in strength, flexibility, disease activity and pain compared to the PTR group. However the difference between groups did not reach statistical significance for all the post-intervention measures. No significant correlation was found between functional, disability data or pain intensity and disease duration for both groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that osteopathic management in addition to a physical therapy and rehabilitation program may be beneficial for individuals who suffer from AS. Further investigations are required using larger sample sizes to confirm these preliminary results.

Reaction Force Magnitude and Orientation During Supine Thoracic Spine Thrust Manipulation: An Exploratory Analysis and Reliability of Preload and Impulse Phase.

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to explore specific kinetic parameters during supine thoracic thrust manipulation and to analyze task reliability and differences between various practitioners METHODS: Kinetic parameters were assessed by examining ground reaction force magnitude and orientation (on the basis of the zenithal angle) using force platforms. The manipulative procedure (consisting of the application of 3 preloads followed by 1 single thrust adjustment) was performed by different practitioners at 3 sessions. Application of thrust was allowed for trained practitioners only. Preload force, peak force, and vector force orientation were compared between sessions and practitioners. RESULTS: Reliability analysis showed that practitioners achieved similar preload and peak force independent of the session, with comparable force orientation data. Differences between practitioners were observed for preload and peak force but not regarding the zenithal angle during the thrust phase. CONCLUSION: This study is the first that explores kinetic parameters for supine thoracic thrust manipulation. Task repeatability was confirmed and several differences were observed between practitioners. Certainly, there is a need for further investigation examining both dynamic parameters (ie, velocity and accelerations) and the potential neurologic effect of such manipulative technique.

Morphometric changes of the cervical intervertebral foramen: A comparative analysis of pre-manipulative positioning and physiological axial rotation.

BACKGROUND: Cervical foraminal impingement has been described as a source of radicular pain. Clinical tests and head motions have been reported for affecting the intervertebral foramen (IVF) dimensions. Although manual approaches are proposed in the management of cervical radiculopathy, their influence on the foraminal dimensions remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of pre-manipulative positioning versus cervical axial rotation on the foraminal dimensions of the lower cervical spine. METHODS: Thirty asymptomatic volunteers underwent CT scan imaging in neutral position and axial rotation or pre-manipulative positioning. The manipulation task was performed at C4-C5 following a multiple components procedure. 3D kinematics and IVF (height, width and area) were computed for each cervical segment. RESULTS: The results showed that foraminal changes are dependent on motion types and cervical levels. With reference to head rotation, IVF opening occurred on the ipsilateral side during pre-manipulative positioning while axial rotation involved the contralateral side. Regardless of the side considered, magnitudes of opening were similar between both attitudes while narrowing was lower at the target and adjacent levels during the pre-manipulative positioning. Some associations between segmental motion and IVF changes were observed for the target level and the overlying level. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that pre-manipulative positioning targeting C4-C5 modified IVF dimensions differently than the passive axial rotation. The findings suggest that techniques which incorporate combined movement positioning influence segmental motion and IVF dimensions differently at the target segment, compared to unconstrained rotation. Further investigations are needed to determine the clinical outcomes of such an approach.

Relationship Between Subjective Experience of Individuals, Practitioner Seniority, Cavitation Occurrence, and 3-Dimensional Kinematics During Cervical Spine Manipulation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess individual subjective experience (ISE) of the recipients of a cervical manipulation and to analyze the influence of kinematics, cavitation occurrence, and practitioner seniority on individual experience. METHODS: Practitioners with different seniority (years of experience) manipulated 20 asymptomatic volunteers at C3 and C5 on both sides. Kinematics were recorded using a 3-dimensional electrogoniometer, and ISE data were gathered through a questionnaire to explore the subjects' experiences of manipulation in terms of tactile sensations, relaxation, perception of the task, and therapist handling. Kinematics, occurrence of cavitation, practitioner's seniority, and ISE data were analyzed concurrently. RESULTS: Motion parameters obtained during manipulation were found to be influenced by cavitation occurrence and differences between practitioners. Data analysis indicated that ISE could be grouped into 2 factors. The first revolved around grip firmness and range and speed of practitioner's gesture. The second factor represented patient's relaxation and the precision of handling. Also, most ISE data correlated with kinematics, although a subjective measurement did not always correlate the highest with its objective counterpart. When cavitation occurred, ISE ratings were higher, suggesting that participants may associate cavitation with the success of manipulations. Higher practitioner seniority (more years of experience) induced feelings of higher speed, amplitude, firmness, and precision. CONCLUSIONS: Recipients of cervical manipulation experienced different subjective feelings that can be expressed in 2 dimensions. These feelings are influenced by cavitation occurrence and practitioner's seniority. A better understanding of an individual's subjective experience related to cervical manipulation could increase confidence and improve the patient-therapist relationship, and it may provide further therapeutic perspectives for the practitioners.

Head-trunk kinematics during high-velocity-low-amplitude manipulation of the cervical spine in asymptomatic subjects: helical axis computation and anatomic motion modeling.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze the in vivo 3-dimensional kinematics of the head during cervical manipulation including helical axis (HA) computation and anatomic motion representation. METHODS: Twelve asymptomatic volunteers were included in this study. An osteopathic practitioner performed 1 to 3 manipulations (high-velocity and low-amplitude [HVLA] multiple component technique) of the cervical spine (between C2 and C5) with the patient in the sitting position. During manipulation, head motion was collected using an optoelectronic system and expressed relative to the thorax. Motion data were processed to analyze primary and coupled motions and HA parameters. Anatomic motion representation including HA was obtained. RESULTS: During manipulation, average maximal range of motion was 39° (SD, 6°), 21° (SD, 7°), and 8° (SD, 5°) for lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR), and flexion extension, respectively. For the impulse period, magnitude averaged of 8° (SD, 2°), 5° (SD, 2°), and 3° (SD, 2°), for LB, AR, and flexion extension, respectively. Mean impulse velocity was 139°/s (SD, 39°/s). Concerning AR/LB ratios, an average of 0.6 (SD, 0.3) was observed for global motion, premanipulation positioning, and impulse. Mean HA was mostly located ipsilateral to the impulse side and displayed an oblique orientation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated limited range of AR during cervical spine manipulation and provided new perspectives for the development of visualization tools, which might be helpful for practitioners and for the analysis of cervical manipulation using HA computation and anatomic representation of motion.