Clinical impact and immunological alterations in asthmatic patients allergic to grass pollen subjected to high urban pollution in Madrid.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of asthma has increased in recent decades. Among the reasons for this increase is environmental pollution. Pollutants cause bronchial inflammation and introduce modifications in the pollen, making it more allergenic. OBJECTIVE: Assess symptoms and medication requirements of asthmatic patients with grass allergies in Madrid (high urban pollution) and Ciudad Real (low pollution), and simultaneously evaluate the in vitro effects that pollen collected in both areas has on the immune cells of patients. METHODS: During two pollen seasons, patients from both cities were included. The patients recorded their symptoms and the asthma medication they took daily. In both cities, pollen data, pollutants and meteorological variables were evaluated. The response to different cell populations from patients in both areas were analysed after "in vitro" stimulation with pollen from both cities. RESULTS: The symptoms and medication use of the patients in Madrid was 29.94% higher. The NO2 concentration in Madrid was triple that of Ciudad Real (33.4 vs. 9.1 µg/m3 of air). All other pollutants had very similar concentrations during the study period. Pollen from the high pollution area caused a significant enhancement of T-CD8+ and NK cells proliferation compared with pollen of low pollution area, independently of the patient's origin. CONCLUSION: Asthmatic patients from Madrid have a worse clinical evolution than those from Ciudad Real because of higher levels of urban pollution, and this could be driven by the higher capacity of pollen of Madrid to activate T-CD8+ and NK cells.

The Basophil Activation Test Can Be of Value for Diagnosing Immediate Allergic Reactions to Omeprazole.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used to treat gastrointestinal diseases. Incidence of hypersensitivity reactions to PPIs has risen, likely because of increased consumption. Their diagnosis is difficult, with skin tests (STs) presenting low sensitivity, making it necessary to perform drug provocation tests (DPTs). The value of in vitro tests for the diagnosis of immediate reaction to PPI is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the diagnostic value of the basophil activation test (BAT) in a group of patients diagnosed with immediate allergy to omeprazole. METHODS: The study included 42 patients with confirmed immediate allergic reactions to omeprazole confirmed by positive ST results or DPT results and 22 age- and sex-matched subjects tolerant to PPIs. BAT was performed with omeprazole, pantoprazole, and lansoprazole using CD63 and CD203c as activation markers. RESULTS: ST sensitivity was 66.7% with a specificity of 100%. BAT using CD63 with a stimulation index of more than 2 as positive revealed a sensitivity of 73.8%, a specificity of 100%, a positive predictive value of 100%, and a negative predictive value of 66.7%. BAT was positive in 57.1% of patients with negative ST result, and thus by combining ST and BAT we can correctly diagnose 85.7% of patients with immediate allergy to omeprazole. CONCLUSION: BAT represents a complementary tool for inclusion in the allergological workup for patients allergic to omeprazole. When combined with ST, it can be of value to guide the clinician as to whether to perform a DPT.

Use of the Basophil Activation Test May Reduce the Need for Drug Provocation in Amoxicillin-Clavulanic Allergy.

BACKGROUND: Reports of selective reactions to clavulanic acid (CLV) have increased in recent decades because of its increased prescription in combination with amoxicillin (AX) as AX-CLV. Basophil activation test (BAT) is used for diagnosing beta-lactam immediate hypersensitivity and is the only available in vitro assay for diagnosing patients with immediate hypersensitivity to CLV. However, few studies, and with limited numbers of patients have been published. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the sensitivity, specificity, and negativization rates of BAT to AX and CLV. METHODS: We studied 115 patients with immediate allergic reactions after AX-CLV treatment, 57 with selective reactions to AX (group A), 58 with selective reactions to CLV (group B), and 28 tolerant subjects. BAT was performed with AX in group A and with CLV in group B. A 4-year follow-up study was performed in patients with an initial positive BAT result. RESULTS: The overall sensitivity of BAT was 55%, specificity 89%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 96%. For group A, sensitivity was 47%, specificity 93%, and PPV 93%; for group B, sensitivity was 62%, specificity 89%, and PPV 92%. Follow-up study showed a faster negativization rate of BAT for group A, with around 40% of patients becoming negative at 12 months in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The high PPV of BAT to CLV shows its potential value as a complementary tool to the allergological workup of patients with immediate allergic reactions after AX-CLV treatment. Importantly, the assay should be done within the first 12 months after the reaction to reduce false-negative results.