RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Constrictive pericarditis (CP) is characterized by scarring and loss of elasticity of the pericardium. This case demonstrates that mixed martial arts (MMA) is a previously unrecognized risk factor for CP, diagnosis of which is supported by cardiac imaging, right and left heart catheterization, and histological findings of dense fibrous tissue without chronic inflammation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old Caucasian male former mixed martial arts (MMA) fighter from the Western United States presented to liver clinic for elevated liver injury tests (LIT) and a 35-pound weight loss with associated diarrhea, lower extremity edema, dyspnea on exertion, and worsening fatigue over a period of 6 months. Past medical history includes concussion, right bundle branch block, migraine headache, hypertension, chronic pain related to musculoskeletal injuries and fractures secondary to MMA competition. Involvement in MMA was extensive with an 8-year history of professional MMA competition and 13-year history of MMA fighting with recurrent trauma to the chest wall. The patient also reported a 20-year history of performance enhancing drugs including testosterone. Physical exam was notable for elevated jugular venous pressure, hepatomegaly, and trace peripheral edema. An extensive workup was performed including laboratory studies, abdominal computerized tomography, liver biopsy, echocardiogram, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Finally, right and left heart catheterization-the gold standard-confirmed discordance of the right ventricle-left ventricle, consistent with constrictive physiology. Pericardiectomy was performed with histologic evidence of chronic pericarditis. The patient's hospital course was uncomplicated and he returned to NYHA functional class I. CONCLUSIONS: CP can be a sequela of recurrent pericarditis or hemorrhagic effusions and may have a delayed presentation. In cases of recurrent trauma, CP may be managed with pericardiectomy with apparent good outcome. Further studies are warranted to analyze the occurrence of CP in MMA so as to better define the risk in such adults.
Assuntos
Traumatismos Cardíacos/etiologia , Artes Marciais/lesões , Pericardite Constritiva/etiologia , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Eletrocardiografia , Traumatismos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Cardíacos/fisiopatologia , Traumatismos Cardíacos/cirurgia , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Imagem Cinética por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pericardiectomia , Pericardite Constritiva/diagnóstico por imagem , Pericardite Constritiva/fisiopatologia , Pericardite Constritiva/cirurgia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Fatores de Tempo , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Função Ventricular DireitaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Combination topical clotrimazole/ betamethasone dipropionate (C-BM) contains a high-potency topical corticosteroid and is not infrequently prescribed for inappropriate patient groups and body sites. Use of C-BM can lead to inadequate clearance or exacerbation of fungal infections as well as cutaneous atrophy, striae, and other skin maladies. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of 1,978 clinical visits where C-BM was prescribed within the University of Utah Health system between 2014 and 2018 to better understand current prescribing patterns. RESULTS: 1,974 prescriptions were written for C-BM. 91.6% of patients were at least the recommended age of 17 years. C-BM was most commonly prescribed for rashes of an inflammatory (42.2%) or fungal nature (38.1%). Clotrimazole/betamethasone dipropionate was prescribed for sensitive areas (face, axillae, groin or diaper region) in 48.9% of patients. Family medicine clinicians prescribed 58.3% of C-BM prescriptions, whereas dermatology clinicians accounted for 3.4%. CONCLUSION: We strongly recommend clinicians use alternative treatments for rashes or refer to dermatologists.