Photobiostimulatory Effect of a Single Dose of Low-Level Laser on Orthodontic Tooth Movement and Pain.

Objective: To assess the effect of low-level laser applied at 3 weeks intervals on orthodontic tooth movement (OTM) and pain using conventional brackets (CB). Materials and Methods: Twenty patients with Angle's class II div 1 (10 males and 10 females; aged 20.25 ± 3.88 years) needing bilateral extractions of maxillary first bicuspids were recruited. Conventional brackets MBT of 0.022 in slot (McLaughlin Bennett Trevisi) prescription braces (Ortho Organizers, Carlsbad, Calif) were bonded. After alignment and levelling phase, cuspid retraction began with nitinol closed coil spring on 19 × 25 stainless steel archwire, wielding 150 gram force. 7.5 J/cm2 energy was applied on 10 points (5 buccal and 5 palatal) on the canine roots on the investigational side using gallium-aluminum-arsenic diode laser (940 nm wavelength, iLase™ Biolase, Irvine, USA) in a continuous mode. Target tissues were irradiated once in three weeks for 9 weeks at a stretch (T0, T1, and T2). Patients were given a feedback form based on the numeric rating scale (NRS) to record the pain intensity for a week. Silicon impressions preceded the coil activation at each visit (T0, T1, T2, and T3), and the casts obtained were scanned with the Planmeca CAD/CAM™ (Helsinki, Finland) scanner. Results: The regimen effectively accelerated (1.55 ± 0.25 mm) tooth movement with a significant reduction in distress on the investigational side as compared to the placebo side (94 ± 0.25 mm) (p < 0.05). Conclusions: This study reveals that the thrice-weekly LLLT application can accelerate OTM and reduce the associated pain.

Effectiveness of antimicrobial gels on gingivitis during fixed orthodontic treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The present study was aimed to assess the effectiveness of antimicrobial gels along with conventional tooth brushing to improve gingival health in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All randomized and non-randomized clinical trials done on human subjects were explored in major health science databases (PubMed, CINAHL Plus, EBSCO Dent & Oral Sciences and Cochrane). An additional manual search was done on Google Scholar and on www.clinicaltrials.gov to identify any grey literature and unpublished data. Date of publication was not restricted during the data search. The assessment of risk of bias was done using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias assessment tool. The meta-analysis was done using Review Manager Version 5.3.5 to analyse probing depth to be in two and four-week follow-up. This systematic review is reported according to the PRISMA statement and registered at PROSPERO (CRD42018084530). RESULTS: The electronic database search yielded 3733 records; hand search identified 14 articles meeting the selection criteria which were included in the qualitative data synthesis. Significant improvement in gingivitis has been reported using antioxidant-essential oil gel, cervitec gel (0.2% chlorhexidine), 2% chlorhexidine gel, amine fluoride gel, and 0.4% stannous fluoride gel with>98% availability of Sn+2 ions. Three articles with probing depth as comparable parameter were used for quantitative analysis. At the two and four-week follow-up, overall insignificant differences were observed in the antimicrobial gel group compared to the control group with regard to probing depth. CONCLUSIONS: The use of antioxidant-essential oil gel, amine fluoride gel, 0.4% stannous fluoride gel (98% availability of Sn+2) and 2% chlorhexidine gel resulted in significant improvement in gingivitis. However, probing depth in follow-up visits showed no significant difference between antimicrobial gel and control group.

Effects of low-level laser irradiation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and associated pain with self-ligating brackets.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low-level laser irradiation applied at 3-week intervals on orthodontic tooth movement and pain associated with orthodontic tooth movement using self-ligating brackets. METHODS: Twenty-two patients (11 male, 11 female; mean age, 19.8 ± 3.1 years) with Angle Class II Division 1 malocclusion were recruited for this split-mouth clinical trial; they required extraction of maxillary first premolars bilaterally. After leveling and alignment with self-ligating brackets (SmartClip SL3; 3M Unitek, St Paul, Minn), a 150-g force was applied to retract the canines bilaterally using 6-mm nickel-titanium closed-coil springs on 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel archwires. A gallium-aluminum-arsenic diode laser (iLas; Biolase, Irvine, Calif) with a wavelength of 940 nm in a continuous mode (energy density, 7.5 J/cm2/point; diameter of optical fiber tip, 0.04 cm2) was applied at 5 points buccally and palatally around the canine roots on the experimental side; the other side was designated as the placebo. Laser irradiation was applied at baseline and then repeated after 3 weeks for 2 more consecutive follow-up visits. Questionnaires based on the numeric rating scale were given to the patients to record their pain intensity for 1 week. Impressions were made at each visit before the application of irradiation at baseline and the 3 visits. Models were scanned with a CAD/CAM scanner (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland). RESULTS: Canine retraction was significantly greater (1.60 ± 0.38 mm) on the experimental side compared with the placebo side (0.79 ± 0.35 mm) (P <0.05). Pain was significantly less on the experimental side only on the first day after application of LLLI and at the second visit (1.4 ± 0.82 and 1.4 ± 0.64) compared with the placebo sides (2.2 ± 0.41 and 2.4 ± 1.53). CONCLUSIONS: Low-level laser irradiation applied at 3-week intervals can accelerate orthodontic tooth movement and reduce the pain associated with it.

Effect of a single dose of low-level laser therapy on spontaneous and chewing pain caused by elastomeric separators.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to see the effect of a single dose of low-level laser therapy on spontaneous and chewing pain after the placement of elastomeric separators. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients were randomly selected for this single-blind study. Elastomeric separators were placed mesial and distal to the permanent first molars in all quadrants. Both arches were divided into experimental and control sides. The experimental sides were treated with low-level laser therapy on 3 points on the buccal mucosa for 20 seconds each, with a 940-nm gallium-aluminum-arsenic diode laser on continuous mode and power set at 200 mW. The other side received placebo laser therapy without turning on the laser. A numeric rating scale was used to assess the intensity of spontaneous and chewing pain for the next 7 days. The independent sample t test and repeated-measures analysis of variance with the post hoc Tukey test was used to analyze the results. RESULTS: Significant differences were found in spontaneous and chewing pain among both groups (P <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of low-level laser therapy can be an efficient modality to reduce the postoperative pain associated with the placement of elastomeric separators.