Neoadjuvant moderately high-dose chemotherapy with rh-G-CSF in locally advanced breast carcinoma.

UNLABELLED: The poor results of local treatment for locally advanced breast carcinoma (LABC) justify the use of chemotherapy as primary treatment. Retrospective studies have shown a positive correlation between dose and response rate in advanced breast cancer. G-CSF has shown efficacy in achieving optimal dose intensity and ameliorating chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of a moderately high-dose chemotherapy regimen in terms of response rate, disease-free and overall survival and to assess the role of G-CSF in induced neutropenia. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were the following: age <65 years, WHO performance status <2, histologically proven breast carcinoma, adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, stage IIIA or IIIB disease, and no metastatic disease. No prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy was allowed. Three cycles of the following chemotherapy were used preoperatively: epirubicin (100 mg/m2 on day 1), cyclophosphamide (400 mg/m2 for 3 consecutive days) and rh-G-CSF (5 microg/kg/die from day 4 to day 12 every 14 days). After mastectomy or quadrantectomy plus radiotherapy, all patients were treated with 4 courses of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the CMF 1-8 schedule (methotrexate, 40 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2; fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2; all on days 1 and 8, with recycle every 4 weeks). RESULTS: From May 1992 to June 1996, 57 patients with histologically proven LABC were preoperatively treated. Forty-four patients were premenopausal and 13 postmenopausal; the median age was 45 years (range, 29-64). Thirty-five patients had stage IIIA and 22 patients stage IIIB disease (7 with inflammatory disease). Forty-seven patients underwent radical mastectomy and 10 conservative surgery. A clinical response was noted in 93% (95% confidence interval, 83-98%) of patients (12% complete responses and 81% partial responses); 2 pathological complete remissions (3.5%) were obtained. No toxic deaths were observed. All patients had a follow-up of at least 42 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 76% (standard error--SE), 6%) and the 5-year disease-free survival rate was 68% (SE, 6.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The 14-day regimen was well tolerated and effective in LABC patients, although not superior to standard-dose chemotherapy. To improve results the use of new drugs in controlled clinical trials seems warranted.

Preoperative combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy for middle and lower rectal cancer: preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant treatment for rectal cancer is still controversial. This study reports on overall survival and disease-free survival, toxicity, downstaging, and surgical morbidity in rectal cancer patients who received combined chemoradiation therapy followed by curative surgery. METHODS: Between 1993 and 1998, 51 patients (31 males and 20 females; median age, 60 years; range, 33-73 years) underwent chemoradiation therapy followed by radical surgery for middle and lower rectal adenocarcinoma. Criteria for giving preoperative radiotherapy (total 45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy/day for 5 weeks) and chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil 350 mg/m2/day and leucovorin 10 mg/m2/day, bolus on days 1-5 and 29-33) were an age younger than 75 years; an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0 to 2; and clinical preoperative stage II-III. Forty-three low anterior and eight abdominoperineal resections were performed. Median follow-up time was 29 (range, 3-63) months. RESULTS: Although grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 14 cases (27.4%), all patients completed the planned adjuvant therapy. At pathology, a complete response was found in eight (15.7%) cases. Of the remaining 43 cases, 22 were stage I, 12 were stage II, and 9 were stage III. Five-year actuarial disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 86.4% and 85.5%, respectively. Whereas no local recurrences were found, 4 patients had distant metastases. Three patients died (1 of cancer-related causes), 45 are alive and disease free, and 3 are alive with disease. CONCLUSIONS: The combined preoperative chemoradiation approach used by us seems to improve the disease-free survival and overall survival of selected patients with rectal cancer. However, a longer follow-up time is required to confirm these preliminary results.

Preoperative combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer does not affect early postoperative morbidity and mortality in low anterior resection.

PURPOSE: It is not yet known whether preoperative combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer affects postoperative mortality and morbidity. We therefore evaluated early postoperative complications in patients given adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy before surgery for middle and lower rectal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1998, 41 patients underwent combined preoperative pelvic radiotherapy and chemotherapy at our institution. Most of the patients had 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/day/25 fractions) during five weeks plus 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m2/day) and low-dose leucovorin (10 mg/m2/day) bolus on Days 1 to 5 and 29 to 33. Surgery was performed four to six weeks after completion of adjuvant therapy. The 41 patients (Group A) were retrospectively compared with 30 patients (Group B) who, in the same period, underwent surgery without preoperative adjuvant therapy. The groups were homogeneous for age, gender, preoperative risk factors, operating surgeon, and pathologic stage. Mean distance of the tumor from the anal verge was shorter in Group A patients (P = 0.031). RESULTS: There were seven major postoperative complications in each group. No significant differences were found between the groups for morbidity and mortality rates. Considering all patients, more postoperative complications were found in patients scored as American Society of Anesthesiologists 3, in those with a preoperative hemoglobin value < 10 g/dl, and in those without a diverting stoma (P = 0.0048, P = 0.0453, and P = 0.0033, respectively). At multivariate analysis, independent predictors of major complications were American Society of Anesthesiologists score (relative risk, 343; P = 0.022), diverting stoma (relative risk, 159; P = 0.010), type of surgical procedure (relative risk, 38.9; P = 0.048), preoperative hemoglobin value (relative risk, 9.72; P = 0.061), and intraoperative blood loss (relative risk, 1; P = 0.027). In Group A patients, the absence of diverting stomas was associated with major postoperative complications (P = 0.0307), and independent predictors of major complications were American Society of Anesthesiologists score (relative risk, 56; P = 0.111) and absence of a diverting stoma (relative risk, 22.42; P = 0.222). CONCLUSION: Early postoperative complications after resection for middle and lower rectal adenocarcinoma are affected by intraoperative and preoperative risk factors and absence diverting stomas, but not by preoperative adjuvant therapy.

Prognostic factors in resectable gastric cancer: results of EORTC study no. 40813 on FAM adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The high incidence of locoregional recurrences and distant metastases after curative surgery for gastric cancer calls for improved locoregional control and systemic adjuvant treatment. METHODS: In a randomized clinical trial on adjuvant FAM2 chemotherapy, quality of surgery was evaluated by comparing surgical and pathology data. Univariate and multivariate analysis was made to evaluate the effect of prognostic factors on survival and time of recurrence in relation to patients, tumor, and therapy. RESULTS: Of 314 patients randomized from 28 European institutions, 159 comprised the control and 155 the FAM2 group. After a median follow-up of 80 months, no statistically significant difference was found between survivals. However, for recurrence time, treated patients had a significant advantage over controls (p = 0.02). At univariate analysis, statistically significant differences in survival and time to progression emerged for T, N, disease stage and "adequacy" of surgery. The multivariate analysis retained preoperative Hb level, T, N, and "adequacy" of surgery for time of survival; and T, N, "adequacy" of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy for recurrence time. CONCLUSIONS: Disease stage is the most important prognostic factor. "Adequate" surgery has an important effect. Adjuvant FAM2 delayed time of recurrence, but did not influence overall survival.

Phase II study on neoadjuvant hyperthermic-antiblastic perfusion with doxorubicin in patients with intermediate or high grade limb sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Locoregional control of soft tissue sarcomas of the limbs is achieved generally using a multidisciplinary approach consisting of conservative surgery combined with radiation therapy, intraarterial chemotherapy, or hyperthermic antiblastic perfusion (HAP). Before surgery, HAP seems to be the more suitable tool in decreasing tumor mass and allowing limb-sparing surgery. The authors' aim was to ascertain the activity of HAP with doxorubicin against intermediate or high grade limb tumors. METHODS: In 23 patients with limb sarcomas (2 patients International Union Against Cancer Stage IIA, 4 stage IIB, 1 stage IIIA, 11 stage IIIB, and 5 stage IVB) doxorubicin was administered via HAP 4-6 weeks before surgery. The drug (bolus, 0.7-1.4 mg/kg) was perfused for 60 minutes with a tumor temperature of at least 40.5 degrees C (range, 40.5-42.6 degrees). Tumor necrosis was then assessed radiologically and pathologically. RESULTS: Systemic toxicity was hematologic grade (G) 2 in 2 patients, gastrointestinal (hepatic) in 6, G1 in 2, G2 in 3, and G3 in 1; 2 patients had alopecia; locoregional toxicity (graded according to Wieberdink) was G1 or G2 in 18, G3 in 4, and G4 in 1. Tumor necrosis was more than 50% in 17 patients (74%). Limb-sparing surgery was feasible in 20 patients (91%). At present, 14 patients are alive. Six had local recurrences, and eight had distant metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that HAP with doxorubicin is an active and well-tolerated procedure within a multidisciplinary approach to treatment of limb sarcomas.