Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Revista
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer ; 80(12): 2240-9, 1997 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9404700

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Sialyl-Tn (STn) represents an aberrantly glycosylated mucin epitope that is expressed in breast carcinoma and other adenocarcinomas and is an important factor in the development of novel immunotherapeutic approaches. The primary aim of the current study was to investigate the influence of STn expression on the prognoses of patients with breast carcinoma. METHODS: A cohort of 207 women diagnosed with invasive breast carcinoma who were treated with anthracycline-containing adjuvant chemotherapy and were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial were studied. Expression of STn was determined by an immunohistochemical procedure in which the B72.3 monoclonal antibody was used. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional regression survival analyses were used to compare low STn and high STn patients. RESULTS: Forty-eight (23%) of the 207 specimens demonstrated high STn staining (>25% cells were immunoreactive). During a median follow-up of 5 years, high STn patients had worse disease free survival than low STn patients (55% vs. 74%, respectively; P = 0.03). High STn expression was significantly associated with age (P = 0.04) but not with other conventional prognostic markers. In multivariate analysis using the Cox regression model, high STn emerged as an independent prognostic indicator for disease free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-3.73) and for overall survival (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 0.95-4.92). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that STn may be a valuable marker for identifying women at high risk of developing recurrent breast carcinoma who may be candidates for trials investigating new therapies in combination with standard adjuvant therapy.


Assuntos
Antígenos Glicosídicos Associados a Tumores/biossíntese , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Lobular/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais/análise , Anticorpos Antineoplásicos/análise , Biomarcadores Tumorais , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/metabolismo , Carcinoma Lobular/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Lobular/metabolismo , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Estudos de Coortes , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Doxorrubicina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas , Leucovorina/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Vimblastina/administração & dosagem
2.
Cancer ; 76(1): 46-56, 1995 Jul 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8630876

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Using an a priori theoretic model of behavior change, factors predicting enrollment in a randomized chemoprevention trial during the first year of recruitment were assessed prospectively. METHODS: Eligible participants were asked to complete a 90-item semistructured questionnaire after attendance at an informational meeting. Components of the Health Belief Model (including perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefits and barriers, cues to action, and health motivation), health status, preventive health behaviors, and social influence were assessed in relation to enrollment. RESULTS: Overall, 331 women attended one of the meetings, and 73% completed a questionnaire; 45% enrolled on the trial and 55% did not. In bivariate analyses, all but one of the perceived barriers were associated negatively with enrollment; however, items assessing perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and perceived benefits were not. Nonparticipants also were more likely to be over 49 years of age, to be currently or to have been on estrogen replacement therapy, and to have had hot flashes. In logistic regression analysis, not being able to take estrogen replacement therapy was the strongest predictor of nonparticipation (odds ratio [OR], 12.13, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.63, 40.60). Other factors associated with nonparticipation were concern about side effects of tamoxifen (OR, 5.06; CI, 2.37, 10.80); the possibility of getting a placebo (OR, 7.75; CI, 1.51, 39.67); the costs associated with the trial (OR, 3.21; CI, 1.12, 9.24); and absence of concern that significant others would be reassured if the respondent was taking tamoxifen (OR, 2.58; CI, 1.04, 6.41). CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the view that recruitment efforts for chemoprevention trials should address barriers specific to their circumstances. In addition, increasing the support available from personal social networks may enhance recruitment to chemoprevention trials for breast cancer.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Seleção de Pacientes , Adulto , Institutos de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/psicologia , Análise de Regressão , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Tamoxifeno/efeitos adversos , Texas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA