A Real-World Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism: Lessons from the REMOTEV Registry.

Background and objectives: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a health and economic burden with consequent healthcare resource utilization. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as the mainstay option for VTE treatment but few data exist on their cost-effectiveness as compared to the standard therapy (vitamin K antagonists (VKAs)). This study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared to VKAs in VTE treatment by calculating the incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER). Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective observational study based on the REMOTEV registry, including patients hospitalized for VTE from 23 October 2013 to 31 July 2015, to evaluate the impact of the anticoagulant treatment (DOACs versus VKAs) on 6-month complications: major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding, VTE recurrence and all-cause death. Rivaroxaban was the only DOAC prescribed in this study. The ICER was calculated as the difference in costs divided by the difference in effectiveness. Results: Among the 373 patients included, 279 were treated with rivaroxaban (63.1 ± 17.9 years old; 49% men) and 94 with VKAs (71.3 ± 16.6 years old; 46% men). The mean cost was EUR 5662 [95% CI 6606; 9060] for rivaroxaban and EUR 7721 [95% CI 5130; 6304] for VKAs, while effectiveness was 0.0586 95% CI [0.0114; 0.126] for DOACs and 0.0638 [95% CI 0.0208; 0.109] for VKAs. The rivaroxaban treatment strategy was dominant with costs per patient EUR 2059 lower [95% CI -3582; -817] and a higher effectiveness of 0.00527 [95% CI -0.0606; 0.0761] compared to VKAs. Conclusions: This study provides real-world evidence that rivaroxaban is not only an efficient and safe alternative to VKAs for eligible VTE patients, but also cost-saving.

Rivaroxaban versus standard anticoagulation for symptomatic venous thromboembolism (REMOTEV observational study): Analysis of 6-month outcomes.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to provide safety and efficacy data of rivaroxaban in routine patient care in a non-selected symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) population. METHODS AND RESULTS: REMOTEV is a prospective, non-interventional study of patients with acute symptomatic VTE, treated with oral rivaroxaban, VKA or parenteral heparin/fondaparinux alone for at least 3months and who are followed up for 6months. From Nov. 2013 to July 2015, 499 consecutive patients were retained for baseline analysis and 445 for safety analysis. The mean age was 65.1years, 7.6% had previously known active cancer, 18.6% had creatinine clearance 30≤CrCl<60mL/min, and 87.8% had pulmonary embolism with or without deep venous thrombosis. The major and clinically relevant bleeding rate was 5.4% (15/280) in the rivaroxaban group, 9.4%/(9/96) in the VKA group and 7.2% (5/69) in the heparin/fondaparinux group. The recurrent VTE rate was 1.4% (4/280) in the rivaroxaban group, 3.1% (3/96) in the VKA group and 11.6% (8/69) in the heparin/fondaparinux group. In the propensity score-adjusted samples, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding (HR 0.37 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.93], p<0.05), all-cause death (HR 0.21 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.66], p<0.01) and the composite of recurrent VTE, major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding and all-cause mortality (HR 0.35 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.71], p<0.01), were significantly lower in the rivaroxaban group compared to the VKA group. CONCLUSION: In REMOTEV 6-month outcomes are consistent with the findings of the phase 3 randomized trials and post-marketing data, with low rates of major bleeding and symptomatic recurrent VTE.