RESUMO
Relatively large thermal gradients may exist during exposure of an animal to microwaves (MWs), particularly at high frequencies. Differences in thermal gradients within the body may lead to noticeable differences in the magnitude of cardiovascular changes resulting from MW exposure. This study compares the thermal distribution and cardiovascular effects of exposure to a single MW frequency with effects of simultaneous exposure to two frequencies. Ketamine-anesthetized male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 58) were exposed individually to one of three conditions: 1-GHz, 10-GHz, or combined 1- and 10-GHz MWs at an equivalent whole-body specific absorption rate of 12 W/kg. The continuous-wave irradiation was conducted under far-field conditions with animals in E orientation (left lateral exposure, long axis parallel to the electric field) or in H orientation (left lateral exposure, long axis perpendicular to the electric field). Irradiation was started when colonic temperature was 37.5 degrees C and was continued until lethal temperatures were attained. Colonic, tympanic, left and right subcutaneous, and tail temperatures, and arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate were continuously recorded. In both E and H orientations, survival time (i.e., time from colonic temperature of 37.5 degrees C until death) was lowest in animals exposed at 1-GHz, intermediate in those exposed at 1- and 10-GHz combined, and greatest in the 10-GHz group (most differences statistically significant). At all sites (with the exception of right subcutaneous), temperature values in the 1- and 10-GHz combined group were between those of the single-frequency exposure groups in both E and H orientations. During irradiation, arterial blood pressure initially increased and then decreased until death. Heart rate increased throughout the exposure period. The general, overall patterns of these changes were similar in all groups. The results indicate that no unusual physiological responses occur during multi-frequency MW exposure, when compared with results of single-frequency exposure. Bioelectromagnetics 21:159-166, 2000. Published 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Assuntos
Temperatura Corporal/efeitos da radiação , Coração/efeitos da radiação , Micro-Ondas/classificação , Análise de Variância , Anestesia Geral , Anestésicos Dissociativos/administração & dosagem , Animais , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos da radiação , Colo/fisiologia , Colo/efeitos da radiação , Limiar Diferencial , Orelha Média/fisiologia , Orelha Média/efeitos da radiação , Exposição Ambiental , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos da radiação , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Postura , Doses de Radiação , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Respiração/efeitos da radiação , Temperatura Cutânea/efeitos da radiação , Taxa de Sobrevida , Cauda/fisiologia , Cauda/efeitos da radiação , Fatores de Tempo , Irradiação Corporal TotalRESUMO
In a previous study (Frei et al., Bioelectromagnetics 19, 20-31, 1998), we showed that low-level (0.3 W/kg), long-term exposure of mice prone to mammary tumors to 2450 MHz radiofrequency (RF) radiation did not affect the incidence of mammary tumors, latency to tumor onset, tumor growth rate or animal survival when compared to sham-irradiated animals. In the current study, the specific absorption rate (SAR) was increased from 0.3 W/kg to 1.0 W/kg. The same biological end points were used. One hundred C3H/HeJ mice were exposed in circularly polarized waveguides for 78 weeks (20 h/day, 7 days/week) to continuous-wave, 2450 MHz RF radiation; 100 mice were sham-exposed. There was no significant difference between exposed and sham-exposed groups with respect to the incidence of palpated mammary tumors (sham-exposed = 30%; irradiated = 38%), latency to tumor onset (sham-exposed = 62.0 +/- 2.3 weeks; irradiated = 62.5 +/- 2.2 weeks) and rate of tumor growth. Histopathological evaluations revealed no significant difference in numbers of malignant, metastatic or benign neoplasms between the two groups. Thus long-term exposures of mice prone to mammary tumors to 2450 MHz RF radiation at SARs of 0.3 and 1.0 W/kg had no significant effects when compared to sham-irradiated animals.