Should atrial fibrillation be considered a vascular disease? The need for a comprehensive vascular approach.

INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation (AF) cannot be considered an isolated disease. Patients with AF should be managed using a comprehensive approach that is not limited to stroke prevention. AREAS COVERED: In this manuscript, the potential role of AF as a vascular disease that is managed as part of a holistic approach was reviewed. EXPERT OPINION: The residual risk of stroke in patients with AF reaches 1-2% annually, despite appropriate anticoagulation therapy. Additionally, patients with AF may develop cognitive impairment through stroke-independent pathways. Furthermore, patients with AF may have a higher risk of developing atherosclerotic vascular disease in various vascular beds and chronic kidney disease; conversely, patients with atherosclerotic disease may have an increased risk of developing AF. AF should be considered a truly systemic vascular disease, since it brings together several hemodynamic and systemic changes, including inflammation, oxidative stress, activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and sympathetic systems, as well as a prothrombotic state and endothelial dysfunction. In this regard, patients with AF should be treated based on a holistic approach that is not limited to oral anticoagulation but includes complete vascular protection.

Impact of an integral assistance model between primary care and cardiology on the management of patients with ischemic heart disease or atrial fibrillation.

AIM: To analyze the impact of implementing a program integrating cardiology and primary care in clinical practice. METHODS: In the integrated care model, every cardiologist was assigned to each primary care center. RESULTS & CONCLUSION: The implementation of the new care model was associated with a significant reduction of 31.2% in requests of first visits. In addition, the delay to the cardiologist consultation significantly decreased by 54.5% for the first visits, and by 57.1% for the follow-up visits. The proportion of patients that achieved recommended low density lipoprotein-cholesterol goals significantly increased from 20.8 to 29.6%. The proportion of patients submitted to anticoagulant therapy significantly increased from 69.3 to 74.2%, as well as the proportion of patients taking direct oral anticoagulants (from 7.9 to 28.4%).