Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 79(2): 421-429, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28120036

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Codrituzumab, a humanized antibody against glypican-3, is highly expressed in HCC. A phase I study evaluated the combination with sorafenib in HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a 3 + 3 design, codrituzumab was given intravenously in various doses with sorafenib 400 mg twice daily to patients with advanced HCC, age ≥18, ECOG 0-1, Child-Pugh A and B7, adequate organ functions, and no prior systemic therapy, with tumor assessment by RECIST 1.0 and safety by CTCAE 3.0. PK and pre, during, and post-therapy 124I radiolabeled codrituzumab PET scan imaging were performed. RESULTS: 41 patients were enrolled: 2.5 mg/kg weekly (qw) (12), 5 mg/kg qw (12), 10 mg/kg qw (3), 1600 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) (6), and 1600 mg qw (7). Two drug limiting toxicities occurred: grade 3 hyponatremia at 5 mg/kg and grade 3 hyponatremia and hyperglycemia at 1600 mg q2w. Adverse events occurred in 80% of patients, including at least one ≥grade 3: ten (25%) increased AST, three (7.5%) increased ALT, and ten (25%) increased lipase. There were no responses and nine (25.7%) had stable disease. PK C max and AUCt of codrituzumab and sorafenib were comparable to single-agent data. Thirteen out of 14 patients showed 124I radiolabeled codrituzumab uptake in tumor. In all three patients who underwent a post-progression PET, glypican-3 remained expressed. CONCLUSION: Codrituzumab plus sorafenib were tolerated at 1600 mg q2w and 400 mg bid, respectively, with no responses. Codrituzumab exerts selective distribution to HCC cells, and GPC3 does not show any down-regulation post-progression (NCT00976170).


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Glipicanas/antagonistas & inibidores , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/farmacocinética , Feminino , Humanos , Radioisótopos do Iodo , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Niacinamida/administração & dosagem , Niacinamida/efeitos adversos , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Niacinamida/farmacocinética , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Fenilureia/farmacocinética , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Sorafenibe
4.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 45(8): 733-7, 2011 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20930642

RESUMO

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common solid organ malignancies worldwide, and its incidence is rising in industrialized nations. Sorafenib, an oral multikinase inhibitor, is effective for the treatment of advanced HCC, and is the only systemic drug indicated for the treatment of unresectable HCC. Patients with HCC often have cirrhosis due to viral infection, chronic alcohol consumption, or other causes of liver damage, resulting in reduced liver function of variable severity. Because of the heterogeneity of HCC cases, physicians must consider the benefits and risks associated with sorafenib treatment on a patient-by-patient basis. California Pacific Medical Center (PMC) has established a clinical protocol, discussed here, for treatment of HCC with sorafenib, and for management of treatment-associated adverse effects. In addition, 3 case reports are presented as examples of the use of sorafenib in patient populations not represented in the phase 3 trials: as an adjuvant treatment after a surgical procedure and as effective treatment for stabilizing recurrent and metastatic HCC.


Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Benzenossulfonatos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Piridinas/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Benzenossulfonatos/efeitos adversos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/secundário , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Transplante de Fígado , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compostos de Fenilureia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Piridinas/efeitos adversos , Sorafenibe , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
5.
J Gastrointest Cancer ; 38(2-4): 148-53, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19089670

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Failures of diagnosis of colorectal cancer by colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy have been demonstrated using various techniques. A relative assessment of these diagnostic tests for patients with colorectal cancer has not been reported. This study was designed to determine relative rates of failures for these tests when applied to diagnosis of colorectal cancer. METHODS: We created a database of patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed between 2000 and 2005. Records were reviewed for the results of colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy in the 3 years prior to diagnosis. An examination that was negative for cancer with no immediate follow-up was defined as a failure of diagnosis, either from inaccurate observation, failure to examine the entire colon, or failure of timely follow-up. The failure rates were compared. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-nine patients, who had 421 examinations, were analyzed. The diagnosis of colorectal cancer failed in 60 of 379 patients (16%). These 60 patients had 71 examinations that failed to make the diagnosis: 25 of 282 colonoscopies (9%), 16 of 79 barium enemas (20%), and 30 of 60 flexible sigmoidoscopies (50%). These differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Failure rates for colonoscopy, barium enema, and flexible sigmoidoscopy were 9%, 20%, and 50%.


Assuntos
Colonoscopia , Neoplasias Colorretais/diagnóstico , Erros de Diagnóstico , Enema , Sigmoidoscopia , Idoso , Sulfato de Bário , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA