Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Métodos Terapêuticos e Terapias MTCI
Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 162(7): 936-9, 2000 Feb 14.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10740436

RESUMO

Ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily was compared to pivampicillin 700 mg orally twice daily for 10 days in 172 men (41-85 years) with acute epididymitis. Failure of treatment occurred in 48 patients, in 15/76 (19.7%) receiving ciprofloxacin versus in 33/82 (40.2%) receiving pivampicillin (p = 0.006). Ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily is more effective than pivampicillin 700 mg orally twice daily and has fewer adverse events.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapêutico , Epididimite/tratamento farmacológico , Penicilinas/uso terapêutico , Pivampicilina/uso terapêutico , Doença Aguda , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Método Duplo-Cego , Epididimite/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Penicilinas/administração & dosagem , Pivampicilina/administração & dosagem , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
BJU Int ; 84(7): 827-34, 1999 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10532980

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily with pivampicillin 700 mg orally twice daily for 10 days in men with acute epididymitis and over 40 years of age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study comprised 172 men who entered a prospective, controlled, randomized, double-blind, trial of pivampicillin and ciprofloxacin. The median (range) age of the 158 patients eligible for the efficacy analysis was 58 (41-85) years; 41% had previously had a urinary tract infection and 27% had previously had epididymitis. Only one patient had a urethral catheter and 38% were sexually active. About half of the patients were admitted to hospital. RESULTS: No bacteria could be cultured from samples in 53% of the patients; Escherichia coli could be cultured from 35% and the remaining isolates were the expected urinary pathogens. None of the patients had Gonococci and only one in each group had Chlamydia. Mycoplasma hominis was detected in three patients only and M. genitalium was detected in three, while Ureaplasma was detected in 24 (15%). The treatment failed in 48 patients; in 15 of 76 (20%) receiving ciprofloxacin and in 33 of 82 (40%) receiving pivampicillin. This corresponds to a reduction in the risk of failure of 20.5% (95% confidence limits 6.6-40.2%, P=0. 006). The principal cause of failure was an unsatisfactory clinical response requiring changed antibiotic treatment in 27 patients; adverse events were responsible for failure in 14. The in vitro resistance of cultured bacteria was low in both groups, at approximately 4%. Adverse events, mainly gastro-intestinal, occurred in 17 of 83 (21%) patients starting on ciprofloxacin and in 33 of 89 (37%) receiving pivampicillin (P=0.04). CONCLUSION: For epididymitis in men over the age of 40 years ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily is more effective than pivampicillin 700 mg orally twice daily. Furthermore, ciprofloxacin has a lower incidence of adverse events.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Ciprofloxacina/administração & dosagem , Epididimite/tratamento farmacológico , Penicilinas/administração & dosagem , Pivampicilina/administração & dosagem , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Falha de Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA