Patient Engagement With Early Stage Advance Care Planning at a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

BACKGROUND: Establishing care preferences and selecting a prepared medical decision-maker (MDM) are basic components of advance care planning (ACP) and integral to treatment planning. Systematic ACP in the cancer setting is uncommon. We evaluated a systematic social work (SW)-driven process for patient selection of a prepared MDM. METHODS: We used a pre/post design, centered on SW counseling incorporated into standard-of-care practice. New patients with gynecologic malignancies were eligible if they had an available family caregiver or an established Medical Power of Attorney (MPOA). Questionnaires were completed at baseline and 3 months to ascertain MPOA document (MPOAD) completion status (primary objective) and evaluate factors associated with MPOAD completion (secondary objectives). RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty patient/caregiver dyads consented to participate. One hundred and sixteen (32%) had MPOADs at baseline. Twenty (8%) of the remaining 244 dyads completed MPOADs by 3 months. Two hundred and thirty-six patients completed the values and goals survey at both baseline and follow-up: at follow-up, care preferences were stable in 127 patients (54%), changed toward more aggressive care in 60 (25%), and toward the focus on the quality of life in 49 (21%). Correlation between the patient's values and goals and their caregiver's/MPOA's perception was very weak at baseline, improving to moderate at follow-up. Patients with MPOADs by study completion had statistically significant higher ACP Engagement scores than those without. CONCLUSION: A systematic SW-driven intervention did not engage new patients with gynecologic cancers to select and prepare MDMs. Change in care preferences was common, with caregivers' knowledge of patients' treatment preferences moderate at best.

Implementation of modified early-goal directed therapy for sepsis in the emergency center of a comprehensive cancer center.

PURPOSE: The investigation examines the impact of a standardized sepsis order set and algorithm utilizing non-invasive monitoring for early-goal directed therapy (EGDT) in an emergency center setting on the clinical outcomes of sepsis in cancer patients. METHODS: Single-center, retrospective study comparing clinical outcomes of sepsis before and after routine usage of a standardized order set and algorithm for non-invasive elements of EGDT for sepsis in an emergency center of a comprehensive cancer center. The outcomes measures evaluated were 28-day in-hospital mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, hospital length of stay, goal mean arterial pressure and urine output within the first 6 h of treatment, time to measurement of lactic acid, and appropriateness and timeliness of initial antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: The 28-day in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the post-intervention group compared to the pre-intervention group (20 vs. 38%, p = 0.005). The percentages of patients who reached their goal mean arterial pressure (74 vs. 90%, p = 0.004) and goal urine output (79 vs. 96%, p = 0.002) during the first 6 h of treatment were higher the after than the before group. No significant differences were detected in the rest of the outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a standardized sepsis order set and algorithm to improve compliance with the non-invasive elements of EGDT for sepsis in cancer patients in the emergency center setting was associated with a decreased 28-day in-hospital mortality rate.

Demographic and clinical determinants of having do not resuscitate orders in the intensive care unit of a comprehensive cancer center.

To understand the needs of patients and family members as physicians communicate their expectations about patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), we evaluated the demographic and clinical determinants of having a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order for adults with cancer. Patients included were admitted from June 16, 2008-August 16, 2008, to the ICU in a comprehensive cancer center. We conducted a prospective chart review and collected data on patient demographics, length of stay, advance directives, clinical characteristics, and DNR orders. A total of 362 patients met the inclusion criteria; only 15.2% had DNR orders before ICU discharge. In the multivariate analysis, we found that medical admission was an independent predictor of having a DNR order during the ICU stay (odds ratio = 3.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-9.28); we also found a significant two-way interaction between race/ethnicity and type of admission (medical vs. surgical) with having a DNR order (p = .04). Although medical admissions were associated with significantly more DNR orders than were surgical admissions, we observed that the subgroup of non-white patients admitted for medical reasons was significantly less likely to have DNR orders. This finding could reflect different preferences for aggressive care by race/ethnicity in patients with cancer, and deserves further investigation.