Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip(®) can be performed without general anesthesia and without conscious sedation.

BACKGROUND: General anesthesia is known to be associated with an increased risk for complications, especially in elderly and multi-morbid patients, the primary target population of the MitraClip(®) technique. The aim is to assess whether general anesthesia and even conscious sedation can be avoided during the MitraClip(®) procedure. METHODS: A total of 91 consecutive patients who underwent MitraClip(®) implantation [median 77 years, (IQR 72-83), 40 % female] were retrospectively analyzed. The first 26 patients were treated in general anesthesia. Afterwards, local anesthesia was chosen as primary anesthetic approach. Altogether, 28 (31 %) patients received general anesthesia, local anesthesia was performed in 35 (38 %) patients with sedation and in 28 (31 %) patients without sedation. RESULTS: The respective patient groups were similar regarding their baseline characteristics. Procedural success (successful implantation of at least one clip and post-procedure MR grade ≤2) was achieved in 89 % with no difference between the groups (93 % in general anesthesia, 89 % in local anesthesia with sedation, 86 % in local anesthesia without sedation, p = ns). No difference regarding hospital complications was noted. Local anesthesia with and without sedation was associated with less necessity for ICU/IMC stay (100 % in general anesthesia, 14 % in local anesthesia with sedation, 14 % in local anesthesia without sedation; p < 0.0001). One-year estimated survival was not significantly different among the groups (63, 82 and 75 %; p = ns). CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter mitral valve repair with the MitraClip(®) can be performed without general anesthesia and even without conscious sedation with similar procedural success and complication rates.

True First-Line Local-Anesthesia Only Protocol for Transfemoral TAVI.

AIMS: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) via femoral access under local anesthesia only (without concomitant sedation) as the initial strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing planned transfemoral TAVI without routine general anesthesia between May 2005 and December 2013 were identified. Baseline characteristics, procedural outcomes, and a 30-day clinical follow-up were obtained. A total of 215 patients underwent TAVI with local anesthesia only as the initial strategy (LA group). Of these patients, 40 (18.6%) received additional sedation (LAS group) during the procedure due to inadequate pain control or agitation and 7 patients (3.3%) underwent conversion to general anesthesia (GA group). TAVI was successfully performed in 211 cases (98.2%). When 30-day outcomes for patients requiring only local anesthesia were compared with patients requiring additional sedation, there was a significantly longer duration of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay in the group with additional sedation (LAS, 5.0 days [range, 3.0-6.0 days] vs LA 3 days [range, 2.0-5.0 days]; P=.02) and general anesthesia (GA 7.0 days [range, 2.5-18.0 days] vs LA 3 days [range, 2.0-5.0]; P=.04). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that TAVI with LA only as the initial strategy is a feasible alternative to GA, with potential benefit of this strategy over using routine concomitant sedation. LA only may be considered a primary option in many patients.