RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening with digital camera by endocrinologists with that by specialist and resident ophthalmologists in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and level of "loss of chance." RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 500 adult diabetic patients (1,000 eyes) underwent three-field retinal photography with a digital fundus camera following pupillary dilatation. Five endocrinologists and two ophthalmology residents underwent 40 h of training on screening and grading of DR and detection of associated retinal findings. A κ test compared the accuracy of endocrinologist and ophthalmology resident screening with that performed by experienced ophthalmologists. Screening efficiency of endocrinologists was evaluated in terms of "loss of chance," i.e., missed diagnoses that required ophthalmologist referrals. RESULTS: The mean weighted κ of DR screening performed by endocronologists was similar to that of ophthalmology residents (0.65 vs. 0.73). Out of 456 DR eyes, both endocrinologists and ophthalmology residents misdiagnosed only stage 1 DR (36 and 14, respectively), which did not require ophthalmologist referral. There were no significant differences between endocrinologists and ophthalmology residents in terms of diabetic maculopathy and incidental findings except for papillary cupping and choroidal lesions, which were not the main purpose of the study or of the training. CONCLUSIONS: The endocrinologist with specific training for DR detection using a three-field digital fundus camera with pupillary dilatation can perform a reliable DR screening without any loss of chance for the patients when compared with identical evaluation performed by experienced ophthalmologists.
Assuntos
Retinopatia Diabética/diagnóstico , Endocrinologia/instrumentação , Oftalmologia/instrumentação , Fotografação/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Accumulation of lipids within Bruch's membrane (BrM) and between BrM and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) accounts for one of the biological changes associated with normal aging and may contribute to the development of age-related maculopathies. The origin of these lipids is still being actively investigated. The relative contribution of plasma lipids and lipids coming from the neural retina remains a matter of controversy. Low-density lipoproteins (LDLs) have been reported to significantly participate in the retina's lipid supply, after active remodeling within RPE. Meanwhile, RPE expresses the enzymatic machinery for synthesizing lipoprotein-like particles. The objective of this study was to establish associations between the fatty acid profile of the ocular structures and adipose tissue as a surrogate for the subjects' past dietary intake. Lipids and fatty acids were analyzed from the neural retina, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)/choroid, the lacrimal gland, and adipose tissue, collected from 27 human donors (19 women, eight men) aged 59-95 years. DHA concentrations in the neural retina were positively associated with the concentrations in cholesteryl esters (CEs) from RPE/choroid and negatively associated with DHA concentrations in phospholipids (PLs) from RPE/choroid. DHA in orbital fat was positively associated with DHA in the lacrimal gland. No significant association was observed in the other ocular structures. Linoleic acid in orbital fat was positively associated with linoleic acid in the lacrimal gland, followed by the neural retina and CEs from RPE/choroid; it was slightly correlated with PLs from RPE/choroid. Other fatty acids that originate exclusively from the diet such as trans fatty acids were detected in orbital fat, the lacrimal gland, PLs, and CEs from RPE/choroid. DHA in the neural retina was poorly associated with its dietary intake, contrary to other fatty acids such as linoleic acid. Within this context, CEs may be important carriers of fatty acids entering the retina. Although epidemiological studies have reported the benefit of DHA in the prevention of age-related macular degeneration, the leading cause of blindness in Western countries, the relevance of supplementing patients with DHA is questioned.