Diagnostic and Treatment Considerations in Restless Legs Syndrome Complicated by Diabetic Neuropathy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diabetic neuropathy from type I diabetes (DMI), type II diabetes (DMII), or gestational diabetes commonly occurs concurrently with restless legs syndrome (RLS) with an estimated prevalence in DMII specifically of 17.7 to 45%. The diagnosis of RLS can be obscured by symptoms of peripheral neuropathy, which may be similar to those of RLS, but also by other RLS mimics, including nocturnal leg cramps or akathisia. The purpose of this review is to outline a framework for considering comorbid diabetic neuropathy and RLS by discussing RLS and its association with peripheral nerve disease, diabetes, and sleep disruption. Treatment for patients with both diabetic neuropathy and RLS may differ from treatment of persons with solely RLS or diabetic neuropathy; key points in this difference are discussed. Finally, a treatment algorithm is provided to guide the approach to treating patients with comorbid RLS and diabetic neuropathy. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been several revisions of the RLS diagnostic criteria which in addition to the main four essential criteria of having (1) an urge to move the legs which is (2) exacerbated by rest, (3) relieved temporarily by movement, and (4) occurs in the evening or night time, now includes a consideration for RLS mimics, requiring that (5) symptoms not be explained by any other symptoms. Additionally, the treatment of both diabetic neuropathy and RLS has evolved to focus first on controlling the blood glucose, avoiding exacerbating medications, supplementing with iron if serum ferritin is low, and starting pharmacotherapy with alpha-2-delta ligands such as gabapentin or pregabalin. Knowledge of the prevalence of peripheral neuropathy with RLS, revised RLS diagnostic criteria, and a general treatment algorithm for the combination of peripheral neuropathy and RLS is critical to providing appropriate care to patients suffering from these two diseases.

Expedited and Comprehensive Management of Low-Risk TIA Patients in the Emergency Department is Safe and Less Costly.

OBJECTIVES: Transient ischemic attack (TIA) can be a warning sign of an impending stroke. The objective of our study is to assess the feasibility, safety, and cost savings of a comprehensive TIA protocol in the emergency room for low-risk TIA patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study performed at an academic comprehensive stroke center. We implemented an emergency department-based TIA protocol pathway for low-risk TIA patients (defined as ABCD2 score < 4 and without significant vessel stenosis) who were able to undergo vascular imaging and a brain MRI in the emergency room. Patients were set up with rapid outpatient follow-up in our stroke clinic and scheduled for an outpatient echocardiogram, if indicated. We compared this cohort to TIA patients admitted prior to the implementation of the TIA protocol who would have qualified. Outcomes of interest included length of stay, hospital cost, radiographic and echocardiogram findings, recurrent neurovascular events within 30 days, and final diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 138 patients were assessed (65 patients in the pre-pathway cohort, 73 in the expedited, post-TIA pathway implementation cohort). Average time from MRI order to MRI end was 6.4 h compared to 2.3 h in the pre- and post-pathway cohorts, respectively (p < 0.0001). The average length of stay for the pre-pathway group was 28.8 h in the pre-pathway cohort compared to 7.7 h in the post-pathway cohort (p < 0.0001). There were no differences in neuroimaging or echocardiographic findings. There were no differences in the 30 days re-presentation for stroke or TIA or mortality between the two groups. The direct cost per TIA admission was $2,944.50 compared to $1,610.50 for TIA patients triaged through the pathway at our institution. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety, and cost-savings of a comprehensive, emergency department-based TIA protocol. Further study is needed to confirm overall benefit of an expedited approach to TIA patient management and guide clinical practice recommendations.