Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer ; 127(13): 2204-2212, 2021 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33765337

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Systemic therapy (ST) can be deferred in patients who have metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and slow-growing metastases. Currently, this subset of patients managed with active surveillance (AS) is not well described in the literature. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study of patients with mRCC across 46 US community and academic centers. The objective was to describe baseline characteristics and demographics of patients with mRCC initially managed by AS, reasons for AS, and patient outcomes. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize demographics, baseline characteristics, and patient-related outcomes. Wilcoxon 2-sample rank-sum tests and χ2 tests were used to assess differences between ST and AS cohorts in continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to assess survival. RESULTS: Of 504 patients, mRCC was initially managed by AS (n = 143) or ST (n = 305); 56 patients were excluded from the analysis. Disease was present in 69% of patients who received AS, whereas the remaining 31% had no evidence of disease. At data cutoff, 72 of 143 patients (50%) in the AS cohort had not received ST. The median overall survival was not reached (95% CI, 122 months to not estimable) in patients who received AS versus 30 months (95% CI, 25-44 months) in those who received ST. Quality of life at baseline was significantly better in patients who were managed with AS versus ST. CONCLUSIONS: AS occurs frequently (32%) in real-world clinical practice and appears to be a safe and appropriate alternative to immediate ST in selected patients.


Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Conduta Expectante
2.
Eur Urol ; 65(2): 278-86, 2014 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23706567

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Advanced prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with skeletal complications, both as a result of bone metastases and because of fractures associated with fragility due to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Osteoclast inhibitors are commonly used to reduce skeletal complications but are associated with a number of potential adverse events. OBJECTIVE: To review clinical trials of osteoclast inhibitors in advanced PCa, to discuss the adverse event profile of these agents, and to discuss strategies to address specific adverse events. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: PubMed was searched for reports of clinical trials of osteoclast inhibitors in advanced PCa. As zoledronic acid and denosumab are used most commonly in this disease, these trials were the focus. The literature was reviewed to identify key publications addressing the prevention and management of adverse events associated with these drugs. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The major findings of the trials and the adverse events are discussed. Prevention and management of common adverse events are addressed. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid prevents loss of bone mineral density associated with ADT and delays skeletal-related events in metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). Denosumab reduces the incidence of fragility fractures associated with ADT, delays the onset of bone metastases in nonmetastatic castration-resistant disease, and is superior to zoledronic acid in the prevention of skeletal complications in mCRPC. Adverse events associated with both agents include osteonecrosis of the jaw and hypocalcemia. Hypocalcemia is more common with denosumab. Zoledronic acid requires dose modifications for renal insufficiency, is contraindicated in severe renal insufficiency, and has been associated with deterioration of renal function. Appropriate patient selection with close attention to dental health, supplementation with calcium and vitamin D, and monitoring of laboratory values are effective strategies to minimize the impact of adverse events associated with osteoclast inhibitors in advanced PCa.


Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Conservadores da Densidade Óssea/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Ósseas/tratamento farmacológico , Difosfonatos/efeitos adversos , Imidazóis/efeitos adversos , Osteoclastos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Ligante RANK/antagonistas & inibidores , Osteonecrose da Arcada Osseodentária Associada a Difosfonatos/etiologia , Densidade Óssea/efeitos dos fármacos , Neoplasias Ósseas/metabolismo , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Denosumab , Fraturas Ósseas/etiologia , Fraturas Ósseas/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Hipocalcemia/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/efeitos adversos , Osteoclastos/metabolismo , Osteoclastos/patologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Neoplasias da Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Ligante RANK/metabolismo , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Ácido Zoledrônico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA