Toxic effects of Tripterygium glycoside tablets on the reproductive system of male rats by metabolomics, cytotoxicity, and molecular docking.

BACKGROUND: Tripterygium glycoside tablets (TGT) is the most common preparation from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook F, which is widely used in clinical for treating rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other autoimmune diseases. However, its serious reproductive toxicity limits its application. PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate the toxic effects of TGT on the reproductive system of male RA rats and its potential toxic components and mechanism. METHODS: Collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) rat model was established, and TGT suspension was given at low, medium, and high doses. Gonadal index, pathological changes, and the number of spermatogenic cells were used to evaluate the toxic effects of TGT on the reproductive system. Non-targeted metabolomics of testicular tissue was conducted by UHPLC-QTOF/MS. Combined with network toxicology, the key targets of TGT-induced reproductive toxicity were screened and RT-qPCR was used to validation. In vitro toxicity of 19 components of TGT was evaluated using TM3 and TM4 cell lines. Molecular docking was used to predict the interaction between toxic components and key targets. RESULTS: TGT reduced testicular and epididymis weight. Pathology analysis showed a lot of deformed and atrophic spermatogenic tubules. The number of spermatogenic cells decreased significantly (P<0.0001). A total of 58 different metabolites including platelet-activating factor (PAF), lysophosphatidylcholine (Lyso PC), phosphatidylinositol (PI), glutathione (GSH), and adenosine monophosphate (AMP) were identified by testicular metabolomics. Glycerophospholipid metabolism, ether lipid metabolism, and glutathione metabolism were key pathways responsible for the reproductive toxicity of TGT. Ten key reproductive toxicity targets were screened by network toxicology. The cytotoxicity test showed that triptolide, triptonide, celastrol, and demethylzeylasteral could significantly reduce the viability of TM3 and TM4 cells. Alkaloids had no apparent toxic effects. Molecular docking showed that the four toxic components had a good affinity with 10 key targets. All binding energies were less than -7 kcal/mol. The RT-qPCR results showed the Cyp19a1 level was significantly up-regulated. Pik3ca and Pik3cg levels were significantly down-regulated. CONCLUSION: Through testicular metabolomics, we found that TGT may cause reproductive toxicity through CYP19A1, PIK3CA, and PIK3CG three target, which was preliminarily revealed. This study laid the foundation for elucidating the toxicity mechanism of TGT and evaluating its safety and quality.

Synchronous Investigation of the Mechanism and Substance Basis of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets on Anti-rheumatoid Arthritis and Hepatotoxicity.

Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets (TGT) has shown obvious anti-rheumatoid arthritis (RA) effects accompanied by hepatotoxicity. Despite that many studies looked at TGT's anti-RA or hepatotoxic mechanism and substance basis, the results were still insufficient. Furthermore, the anti-RA and hepatotoxicity investigations of TGT were undertaken separately, neglecting the relationship between efficacy and toxicity. Herein, an integrated approach combining metabolomics, network pharmacology, serum pharmacochemistry, and molecular docking was adopted to elucidate the mechanism and substance basis of Tripterygium Glycosides Tablets (TGT) on anti-rheumatoid arthritis and hepatotoxicity simultaneously. The results showed that 33 components in TGT were absorbed into rat serum. Two toxic targets (PRKCA, FASN), three effective targets (PLA2G10, PTGES, PLA2G1B), and four effective and toxic targets (PTGS1, PTGS2, PLA2G2A, ALOX5) were obtained by metabolomics combined with network analysis and network pharmacology. A component-target-RA-hepatotoxicity network was constructed and five hepatotoxic components (1-desacetylwilforgine, wilfordconine, wilforgine, wilformine, wilfornine D), eight effective-toxic components (14-oxo-19-(4 → 3) abeo-abieta-3,8,12-tetraen-19,18-olide, 7-oxo-18(4 → 3) abeo-abieta-3,8,11,13-tetraen-18-oic acid, hypoglaulide, triptotriterpenic acid A, wilforol F, wilforlide B, triptoquinone B, wilforlide A); and 23 non-effective and non-toxic components were acquired and validated by molecular docking. In addition, our research revealed that glycerophospholipid metabolism and ether lipid metabolism were correlated to both hepatotoxicity and anti-RA of TGT. While in sphingolipid metabolism, ceramidases regulated ceramide-sphingosine and phytoceramide-phytosphingosine reaction were found to be correlated to hepatotoxicity, sphinganine-1-phosphate lyase (SPL) regulated sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)-phosphoethanolamine and sphinganine 1-phosphate-phosphoethanolamine were found to be attributed to anti-RA effects.

An integrated approach for investigating pharmacodynamic material basis of Lingguizhugan Decoction in the treatment of heart failure.

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE: As a classical formula of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), Lingguizhugan Decoction (LGZGD) has been used for treating heart failure (HF) because it has an efficiency of yang-warming and fluid-dispersing. However, the pharmacodynamic material basis of LGZGD responsible for the therapeutic benefits is not well understood. AIM OF THE STUDY: The aim of this study was to elucidate the pharmacodynamic material basis of LGZGD by an integrated approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following oral administration of LGZGD in mice, ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-Q-TOF-MS/MS) was used to identify prototype substances. A heart failure (HF) model was established, followed by an untargeted metabolomics study to determine potential targets of LGZGD. The network pharmacology method was performed to screen substances that interacted with potential targets of LGZGD treating HF. Molecular docking technology was applied to further screen substances based on binding energy. Cell viability assays were conducted to verify pharmacodynamic effects of selected substances. RESULTS: In all, forty-two prototype substances were identified in the blood, urine, and fecal samples of mice. A total of fifty-five differential metabolites were identified using heart tissue untargeted metabolomics. Twenty-five substances of LGZGD were screened relating to thirty-three targets treating HF. Twenty-two substances were filtered according to their binding energy using molecular docking technology. Cell experiments revealed cinnamaldehyde, glycyrrhetinic acid, kaempferol, daidzein, caffeic acid, and catechin could significantly improve the survival rate of H9c2 cells, which might be the pharmacodynamic material basis of LGZGD. CONCLUSIONS: A scientific approach that integrated in vivo substances identification, metabolomics, network pharmacology, molecular docking, and cell pharmacodynamic assay has been developed to study the pharmacodynamic material basis of LGZGD in the treatment of HF.