Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 33(2): 609-615, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30891997

RESUMO

Inflammation is a common pathogenic mechanism involved in many otorhinolaryngological (ORL) disorders. Broser® is an oral nutraceutical currently containing bromelain 100 mg, escin 30 mg, and selenium 42.5 mcg. It could exert a safe and effective anti-inflammatory activity by virtue of these components. Therefore, the aim of the current survey, conducted in clinical practice of 84 Italian ORL centers, was to evaluate its safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients.


Assuntos
Bromelaínas/uso terapêutico , Escina/uso terapêutico , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Otorrinolaringopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Selênio/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Suplementos Nutricionais , Humanos
2.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 32(1 Suppl. 2): 41-47, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29436209

RESUMO

Introduction: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a common disease usually limited to the oesophagus. Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is an inflammatory reaction of the mucosa of pharynx, larynx, and other associated upper respiratory organs, caused by a reflux of stomach contents outside the oesophagus. LPR is considered to be a relatively new clinical entity with a vast number of clinical manifestations which are treated sometimes empirically and without a correct diagnosis. However, there is disagreement between specialists about its definition and management: gastroenterologists consider LPR to be a substantially rare manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), whereas otolaryngologists believe that LPR is an independent, but common in their practice, disorder. Patients suffering from LPR firstly consult their general practitioners, but a multidisciplinary approach may be fruitful to define a unified strategy based on specific medications and behavioural changes. The present Supplement would review the topic, considering LPR and GER characteristics, pathophysiology, diagnostic work-up, and new therapeutic strategies also comparing different specialist points of view and patient populations. In particular, new insights derive from an interesting gel compound, containing magnesium alginate and E-Gastryal® (hyaluronic acid, hydrolysed keratin, Tara gum, and Xantana gum). In particular, two very large Italian surveys were conducted in real-world setting, such as outpatient clinics. The most relevant outcomes are presented and discussed in the current Issue. Actually, laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is considered an extraesophageal manifestation of the gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Both GERD and its extraesophageal manifestation are very common in clinical practice. Both disorders have a relevant burden for the society: about this topic most of pharmaco-economic studies were conducted in the United States. In population-based studies, 19.8% of North Americans complain of typical symptoms of GERD (heartburn and regurgitation) at least weekly (1). Also in the late 1990s, GERD accounted for $9.3 to $12.1 billion in direct annual healthcare costs in the United States, higher than any other digestive disease. As a result, acid-suppressive agents were the leading pharmaceutical expenditure in the United States. The prevalence of GERD in the primary care setting becomes even more evident when one considers that, in the United States, 4.6 million office encounters annually are primarily for GERD, whereas 9.1 million encounters include GERD in the top 3 diagnoses for the encounter. GERD is also the most frequently first-listed gastrointestinal diagnosis in ambulatory care visits (2, 3) Extraesophageal manifestations of reflux, including LPR, asthma, and chronic cough, have been estimated to cost $5438 per patient in direct medical expenses in the first year after presentation and $13,700 for 5 years.


Assuntos
Refluxo Gastroesofágico , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/economia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/epidemiologia , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Humanos , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo/economia , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo/epidemiologia , Refluxo Laringofaríngeo/terapia , Prevalência , Inquéritos e Questionários
3.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 30(1): 277-84, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27049103

RESUMO

Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (FESS) is a common day surgery technique for upper airway disorders. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a fundamental component of the human connective tissue. HA may exert reparative, anti-inflammatory and immune-modulating activities. Recently, a new intranasal HA formulation has been proposed: a supramolecular system containing lysine hyaluronate, thymine and sodium chloride (T-LysYal®). This randomized study investigated whether intranasal T-LysYal® (RinoLysYal®, Farmigea, Italy) was able to reduce symptom severity, endoscopic features, and nasal cytology in 83 patients (49 males and 34 females mean age 45.4±6.2 years) treated with FESS. All patients were treated with isotonic saline solution for 4 weeks, and a sub-group (active group) was also treated with intranasal T-LysYal®. Patients were visited at baseline, after treatment, and after 4-week follow-up. Intranasal T-LysYal® treatment significantly reduced the quote of patients with symptoms, endoscopic features, and inflammatory cells in comparison to isotonic solution. In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that intranasal T-LysYal® is able to significantly improve patients after FESS and its effect is long lasting.


Assuntos
Adjuvantes Farmacêuticos/administração & dosagem , Adjuvantes Farmacêuticos/farmacologia , Endoscopia , Lisina/administração & dosagem , Lisina/farmacologia , Seios Paranasais/cirurgia , Cloreto de Sódio/administração & dosagem , Cloreto de Sódio/farmacologia , Timina/administração & dosagem , Timina/farmacologia , Administração Intranasal , Contagem de Células , Eosinófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Eosinófilos/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertrofia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mucosa Nasal/efeitos dos fármacos , Mucosa Nasal/patologia , Neutrófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Neutrófilos/patologia , Seios Paranasais/patologia , Conchas Nasais/efeitos dos fármacos , Conchas Nasais/patologia
4.
J Biol Regul Homeost Agents ; 30(4): 1125-1130, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28078863

RESUMO

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and upper airway respiratory infections are frequent in children, and both have a relevant impact on some social aspects, including school attendance and performance, sleep, quality of life (also of the parents), and costs. Saline nasal irrigation is widely employed to reduce nasal congestion and mucopurulent secretion, to stimulate cleansing of the nasal and paranasal cavities, and to induce restoration of mucociliary clearance. The present study evaluated the effects of nasal irrigation on nasal cytology, using the new device Nasir® in 66 children (40 males, 26 females, mean age 7.31±1.7 years, age range 4-17 years) with allergic rhinitis. The patients were treated with nasal irrigation with warm (36°C) Nasir® (250 mL sacs of premixed solution): one sac twice daily for 12 days. Nasal irrigation significantly reduced the neutrophilic infiltrate (baseline median value 2.8±0.7; post treatment value 2±0.5; p less than 0.05). In addition, there was a reduction of eosinophil infiltrate (T0= 3.2±1.1; T1= 2.6±1.2; p= less than 0.05). There was no significant change with regard to bacteria (T0= 2.7±0.9; T1= 2.3±1.02; p= 0.17). In conclusion, this pilot study reports that nasal irrigation with Nasir® might be useful to attenuate upper airway inflammation.


Assuntos
Lavagem Nasal/instrumentação , Rinite Alérgica/terapia , Cloreto de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Soluções Isotônicas/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Projetos Piloto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA