Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Neurogenic Overactive Bladder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on neurogenic overactive bladder that is refractory to pharmacotherapy. METHODS: This randomized trial recruited 83 participants with neurogenic overactive bladder that were nonresponsive to 3-mo first-line anticholinergic drug treatment. Participants were randomized into treatment and control groups. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation current consisting of biphasic square wave with pulse durations of 150 µs and pulse frequency set at 20 Hz were applied to for 30 mins once a day for 90 days. Stimulation was provided over the lateral aspect of the sacrum bilaterally of the electrodes. Patients in the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group stopped taking the anticholinergic drugs. The control group continued to receive anticholinergic drugs for 90 days. The participants' Overactive Bladder Symptom Score, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores, urodynamic values, and voiding diary data were assessed before and after the therapy. RESULTS: The transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation treatment group had significantly decreased Overactive Bladder Symptom scores compared with the control group (P < 0.001); in addition, half of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores were significantly improved in the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation group (P < 0.05). The patients treated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation improved significantly voiding diary parameters at P < 0.05. Similarly, urodynamic values at P < 0.05 favored the experimental group over the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Applying daily transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation over the sacral region for 90 days to patient with neurogenic overactive bladder improved overactive bladder symptoms of patients whose response to anticholinergic drugs is far inferior. TO CLAIM CME CREDITS: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online at http://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME. CME OBJECTIVES: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Determine the therapeutic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on neurogenic overactive bladder (NOAB); (2) Demonstrate the effectiveness of reflex suppression of the bladder using the TENS applied over the sacral region as a stimulation location; and (3) Confirm the TENS method using biphasic square waves with pulse durations of 150 µs and pulse frequencies of 20 Hz as applied is shown to be superior to anticholinergic drugs in managing NOAB. LEVEL: Advanced. ACCREDITATION: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™. Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Coffee consumption and urologic cancer risk: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.

OBJECTIVES: Controversial results were reported among several epidemiologic studies on the relationship between coffee consumption and urologic cancer risk. We, therefore, conducted this meta-analysis to clarify these associations. METHODS: Electronic databases including Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched between January 1966 and August 2013 for eligible studies. Pooled relative risk (RR) and its 95 % confidence interval (CI) were calculated. All P values are two tailed. RESULTS: Thirteen cohorts were eligible for inclusion. As to prostate cancer (PCa), significant reverse association was found among highest versus none/lowest analysis with acceptable heterogeneity (RR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.79-0.95; I(2) 25 %, P value for heterogeneity: 0.221). A pooled RR which assessed advanced PCa was 0.73 (with 95 % CI 0.50-1.07), and a slight stronger reverse association was found in fatal PCa. However, a slight insignificant reverse association, basing on 8 studies with 9 outcomes, was found in dose-response analysis (RR 0.98, 95 % CI 0.93-1.03). For kidney and bladder cancer, insignificant associations were found in both highest versus none/lowest analyses and dose-response analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that coffee consumption may reduce the risk of PCa. No associations were found with both bladder and kidney cancer. Further well-designed large-scaled cohort studies are warranted to provide more definitive conclusions.

A comparative study of thulium laser resection of the prostate and bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia.

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Thulium laser is a new generation of surgical laser. It is a minimally invasive technology with several advantages, including rapid vaporization and minimal tissue damage and bleeding. However, details regarding the safety and efficacy of thulium laser in treating BPH remains unknown. We performed a comparative study in 100 patients with BPH of the safety and efficacy of thulium laser resection of the prostate (TMLRP, n = 50) and bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP, n = 50). We found that the efficacy and indications were the same in TMLRP and TUPKP. In TUPKP, the morbidity of urethrostenosis was low, and was nearly bloodless in surgery and had higher safety. Nevertheless, TUPKP is more suitable for patients with larger prostate volume. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and short-term efficacy of thulium laser resection of the prostate (TMLRP) and bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP) for the treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A total of 100 patients diagnosed with BPH were randomly divided into two groups, treated with either TMLRP (50, group 1) or TUPKP (50, group 2). There was no significant difference in preoperative variables such as age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax ) and postvoid residual urine volume (PVR) between the two groups. The perioperative parameters and therapeutic effects were recorded and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the following parameters between the two groups (TMLRP vs TUPKP [mean ± SD]): operation duration, 61.2 ± 24.2 vs 30.14 ± 15.9 min; catheterization time, 1.8 ± 0.4 vs 3.2 ± 0.6 d; postoperative hospital stay, 3.3 ± 0.8 vs 4.1 ± 1.3 d. The volume of blood loss and postoperative bladder irrigation were significantly lower in TMLRP group than in the TUPKP group. At 1 month after the operation, there were four cases of urethral stricture in the TUPKP group. At 3 months after the operation, IPSS, quality of life (QoL), Qmax and PVR were significantly improved, with no significant difference between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: TMLRP is superior to TUPKP in terms of safety, blood loss, recovery time and complication rate, and is as efficacious as TUPKP for treating BPH. Operation duration was significantly longer in the TMLRP group than in the TUPKP group.

Photoselective vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine whether photoselective vaporization has advantages over transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in terms of effectiveness and safety for treatment of patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Controlled Trial Register were searched for randomized controlled trials. The risk ratio, mean difference, and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated for dichotomous and continuous outcomes, respectively. Risk of bias of enrolled trials was assessed according to Cochrane Handbook. RESULTS: A total of five trials were enrolled. There was no significant difference in the International Prostate Symptom Score and maximum flow rate between photoselective vaporization and TURP at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. Photoselective vaporization was associated with significantly lower risk of capsule perforation, transurethral resection syndrome, and clot retention, significantly lower transfusion requirements, a shorter catheterization time, and a shorter length of hospital stay. TURP was associated with a shorter operative time and a lower risk of reoperation. In addition, there was no difference in risk of acute urinary retention and urethral/bladder neck sclerosis between photoselective vaporization and TURP. CONCLUSIONS: Photoselective vaporization and TURP provide comparable improvements in functional results, including International Prostate Symptom Score and maximum flow rate at 6-, 12-, and 24-month follow-up. Photoselective vaporization offers advantages over TURP in terms of intraoperative safety; however, TURP is found to have a shorter operative time and lower reoperative risk.