RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Due to the high prevalence of diabetes in the world, it seems that one of the most important strategies to prevent and treat this disease are lifestyle changes. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of cognitive behavioral therapy on selected physical and psychological parameters, exercise, and nutritional behaviors in diabetic patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of volunteers with type 2 diabetes. Patients were randomized into two groups: an intervention (n=32) and a control group (n=31). The Beck Physical Activity Questionnaire was used to assess physical activity in combination with the Beck Depression Inventory and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index to assess the levels of depression and the quality of sleep. Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) training consisted of six sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy interventions. The intervention consisted of a face-to-face individual counseling session. The patients received a special diet according to their basal metabolic rate (BMR). At all sessions, dietary advice was reviewed, and during the treatment period, they were asked to record their diet and physical activity. Body composition and blood samples were measured before and after three months of the experiment for both groups. RESULTS: Blood glucose, blood lipid profiles (except high-density lipoprotein), lifestyle, behavior patterns and body composition were significantly improved following CBT intervention (p≤0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CBT can play a key role in improving physiological and psychological parameters in diabetic patients.
Assuntos
Terapia Cognitivo-Comportamental , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Glicemia , Estudos Transversais , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Exercício Físico/fisiologia , Humanos , Lipoproteínas HDLRESUMO
A sero-epidemiological study was carried out on 5660 sera collected, between 2006 and 2008, from different flocks in different regions of the country. The ELISA results showed low levels of antibodies indicating vaccination failures. 45 to 69% of the flocks showed positive levels of antibodies and only 5 to 15% of these were protected. The pathogenicity studies of the Tunisian field isolates TN20/00 and TN335/01 demonstrated high clinical and lesion scores indicating the pathogenic effect of the two isolates. The challenge experiments conducted to evaluate the cross-protection between the H120 vaccine and the field isolates showed low protection rate, especially against the TN20/00 virus. The overall results allowed the determination of the pathogenic nature of the field isolates and a vaccination program based on the use of the only Massachusetts H120 strain did not reduce tracheal and kidney lesions. To better control the disease, adapting the vaccination program by using vaccine allowing better protection against variant strains, is recommended.