Supplementary Fixation Improves Stability of Intra-Articular Distal Radius Fractures Managed With a Spanning Plate.

PURPOSE: Previous studies evaluating weight bearing of distal radius fractures treated through dorsal spanning bridge plates used extra-articular fracture models, and have not evaluated the role of supplementary fixation. We hypothesized that supplementary fixation with a spanning dorsal bridge plate for an intra-articular wrist fracture would decrease the displacement of individual articular pieces with cyclic axial loading and allow for walker or crutch weight bearing. METHODS: Thirty cadaveric forearms were matched into 3 cohorts, controlling for age, sex, and bone mineral density. An intra-articular fracture model was fixed with the following 3 techniques: (1) cohort A with a dorsal bridge plate, (2) cohort B with a dorsal bridge plate and two 1.6-mm k-wires, and (3) cohort C with a dorsal bridge plate and a radial pin plate. Specimens were axially loaded cyclically with escalating weights consistent with walker and crutch weight-bearing with failure defined as 2-mm displacement. RESULTS: No specimens failed at 2- or 5-kg weights, but cohort A had significantly more displacement at these weights compared with cohort B. Cohort A had significantly more failure than cohort C. Both cohort A and cohort B had significantly more displacement at crutch weight bearing compared with cohort C. The supplementary fixation group had significantly lower displacement at crutch weight-bearing compared with cohort A in all gaps. Survival curves demonstrated the fixation cohort to survive higher loads than the nonfixation group. CONCLUSION: There was significantly less displacement and less failure of intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with a spanning dorsal bridge plate and supplementary fixation. Our model showed that either type of fixation was superior to the nonfixation group. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: When considering early weight-bearing for intra-articular distal radius fractures treated with a spanning dorsal bridge plate, supplementary fixation may be considered as an augmentation to prevent fracture displacement.

Charges for Distal Radius Fracture Fixation Are Affected by Fracture Pattern, Location of Service, and Anesthesia Type.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to characterize charges associated with operative treatment of distal radius fractures and identify sources of variation contributing to overall cost. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed using the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2009-2017. Outpatient claims were identified using the International Classification of Diseases-9/10-Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for distal radius fixation surgery. A multivariable mixed model regression was performed to identify variables contributing to total charges of the claim, including patient demographics, anesthesia method, surgery location (ambulatory surgery center [ASC] versus a hospital outpatient department [HOPD], operation time, insurance type, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and billed procedure codes. RESULTS: A total of 9029 claims were included, finding older age, private primary insurance, surgery performed in a HOPD, and use of local anesthesia (vs general or regional) associated with increased total charges. There was no difference between gender, race, or ethnicity. Additionally, open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), increased operative time/fracture complexity, and use of perioperative medications contributed significantly to overall costs. CONCLUSIONS: Charges for distal radius fracture surgery performed in a HOPD were 28.3% higher than compared to an ASC, and cases with local anesthesia had higher billed claims compared to regional or general anesthesia. Furthermore, charges for percutaneous fixation were 54.6% lower than ORIF of extraarticular fracture, and claims had substantial geographic variation. These findings may be used by providers and payers to help improve value of distal radius fracture care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Cost Drivers in Carpal Tunnel Release Surgery: An Analysis of 8,717 Patients in New York State.

PURPOSE: The annual high volume of carpal tunnel releases (CTRs) has a large financial impact on the health care system. Validating the cost drivers related to CTR in a large, diverse patient population may aid in developing cost reduction strategies to benefit health care systems. METHODS: Adult patients with carpal tunnel syndrome who underwent CTR were identified in the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System database from 2016 to 2017. The Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System is a comprehensive all-payer database that collects all inpatient and outpatient preadjudicated claims in New York. A multivariable mixed model regression with random effects was performed for the facility to assess the variables that contributed significantly to the total charge. The variables included were patient age, sex, anesthesia method, whether the surgery took place in an ambulatory surgery center or a hospital outpatient department, operation time in minutes, primary insurance type, race, ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and categories for billed procedure codes. RESULTS: During the period of 2016 to 2017, 8,717 claims were included, with a mean charge per claim of $4,865. General anesthesia was associated with higher charges than local anesthesia. A procedure at a hospital outpatient department was associated with an approximately 48.2% increase in the total charge compared with that at an ambulatory surgery center. A 1-minute increase in the operation time was associated with a 0.3% increase in the total charge. Claims with antiemetics, antihistamines, benzodiazepines, intravenous fluids, narcotic agents, or preoperative antibiotics were associated with higher total charges than claims that did not bill for these. Compared with endoscopic procedures, open procedures had a 44.3% decrease in the total charges. CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive multivariable model has validated that general anesthesia, hospital-based surgery, the use of antibiotics and opioids, longer operative times, and endoscopic CTR significantly increased the cost of surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Economic and decision analyses II.

Current Concepts in the Management of Trigger Finger in Adults.

Trigger finger (TF) is one of the most common causes of hand disability. Immobilization of TF with a joint-blocking orthosis has been demonstrated to effectively relieve pain and improve function. The efficacy of steroid injections for TF varies based on the number of affected digits and the clinical severity of the condition. Up to three repeat steroid injections are effective in most patients. When conservative interventions are unsuccessful, open surgical release of the A1 pulley effectively alleviates the subjective and objective manifestations of TF and currently remains the benchmark procedure for addressing TF. Although several studies have emerged suggesting that a percutaneous approach may result in improved outcomes, this technique demands a learning curve that may predispose patients to higher risk of procedure-related complications. There is no role for preoperative antibiotics in patients who undergo elective soft-tissue procedures of the hand. WALANT anesthesia has gained popularity because it has been associated with improved patient outcomes and a clear cost savings; however, proper patient selection is critical. Similar to other soft-tissue hand procedures, TF surgery rarely necessitates a postoperative opioid prescription.