Management and outcomes of brain metastases from pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a pooled analysis and literature review.

Background: Brain metastases (BM) are rare in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and little data exists concerning these patients and their outcomes. Aim: We aimed to analyze the management, practices, and outcomes of patients presenting BM from PDAC both in our institution and in all cases reported in the literature. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, monocentric analysis using a data mining tool (ConSoRe) to identify all patients diagnosed with PDAC and BM in our comprehensive cancer center (Paoli-Calmettes Institute), from July 1997 to June 2022 (cohort 1). Simultaneously, we reviewed and pooled the case reports and case series of patients with PDAC and BM in the literature (cohort 2). The clinical characteristics of patients in each cohort were described and survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: In cohort 1, 19 patients (0.3%) with PDAC and BM were identified with a median age of 69 years (range: 39-81). Most patients had metastatic disease (74%), including 21% with BM, at diagnosis. Lung metastases were present in 58% of patients. 68% of patients had neurological symptoms and 68% were treated by focal treatment (surgery: 21%, radiotherapy: 42%, Gamma Knife radiosurgery: 5%). In cohort 2, among the 61 PDAC patients with BM described in the literature, 59% had metastatic disease, including 13% with BM at diagnosis. Lung metastases were present in 36% of patient and BM treatments included: surgery (36%), radiotherapy (36%), radiosurgery (3%), or no local treatment (25%). After the pancreatic cancer diagnosis, the median time to develop BM was 7.8 months (range: 0.0-73.9) in cohort 1 and 17.0 months (range: 0.0-64.0) in cohort 2. Median overall survival (OS) in patients of cohort 1 and cohort 2 was 2.9 months (95% CI [1.7,4.0]) and 12.5 months (95% CI [7.5,17.5]), respectively. Conclusion: BM are very uncommon in PDAC and seem to occur more often in younger patients with lung metastases and more indolent disease. BM are associated with poor prognosis and neurosurgery offers the best outcomes and should be considered when feasible.

Laser Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer with Immunostimulating Interstitial Laser Thermotherapy Protocol: Safety and Feasibility Results From Two Phase 2a Studies.

PURPOSE: Ablative techniques have emerged as new potential therapeutic options for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We explored the safety and feasibility of using TRANBERG|Thermal Therapy System (Clinical Laserthermia Systems AB, Lund, Sweden) in feedback mode for immunostimulating Interstitial Laser Thermotherapy (imILT) protocol, the newest ablative technique introduced for the treatment of LAPC. METHODS: The safety and feasibility results after the use of imILT protocol treatment in 15 patients of a prospective series of postsystemic therapy LAPC in two high-volume European institutions, the General and Pancreatic Unit of the Pancreas Institute, of the University of Verona, Italy, and the Department of Surgical Oncology of the Institut Paoli-Calmettes of Marseille, France, were assessed. RESULTS: The mean age was 66 ± 5 years, with a mean tumor size of 34.6 (±8) mm. The median number of cycles of pre-imILT chemotherapy was 6 (6-12). The procedure was performed in 13 of 15 (86.6%) cases; indeed, in two cases, the procedure was not performed; in one, the procedure was considered technically demanding; in the other, liver metastases were found intraoperatively. In all treated cases, the procedure was completed. Three late pancreatic fistulas developed over four overall adverse events (26.6%) and were attributed to imILT. Mortality was nil. A learning curve is necessary to interpret and manage the laser parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Safety, feasibility, and device handling outcomes of using TRANBERG|Thermal Therapy System with temperature probes in feedback mode and imILT protocol on LAPC were not satisfactory. The metastatic setting may be appropriate to evaluate the hypothetic abscopal effect.#NCT02702986 and #NCT02973217.

Borderline or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A single center experience on the FOLFIRINOX induction regimen.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to determine the impact of FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant therapy on patients with non-metastatic borderline/locally advanced (BL/LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), in current practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From 2010 to 2017, 258 patients with BL/LA PDAC from a single high-volume institution received FOLFIRINOX neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: The 258 patients received a median number of 6 cycles of FOLFIRINOX (range, 3-16); 98 (38%) patients underwent curative surgery, and 160 (62%) continued medical treatment. A venous resection was performed in 57 patients (58%), and an arterial resection in 12 (12%). The postoperative 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 6.1% and 8.2%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 57 patients (59%). The median overall survival (OS) in patients who did (n = 98) or did not (n = 160) undergo surgical resection were 39 months and 19 months, respectively (P < 0.001). In resected patients, the ASA 3 score (P < 0.01), venous resection (P < 0.01), hemorrhage (P < 0.01), and R1 margin status (P = 0.03) were found to negatively influence the OS. The median OS was significantly higher in patients who did not require a venous resection (not reached vs. 26.5 months, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX provided a survival benefit in BL/LA PDAC patients, particularly in those who did not ultimately require venous resection.

Comparing Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Young-onset and Late-onset Colorectal Cancer: An International Collaborative Study.

BACKGROUND: Compared with the general population, the incidence of young-onset (YO) colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. However, a significant knowledge gap exists in the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes for these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six international tertiary cancer centers conducted a retrospective study. Patients with YO CRC (aged 18-44 years) and LO CRC (aged > 44 years) diagnosed with histologically proven colorectal adenocarcinoma from June 2003 to June 2014 were enrolled. Patients were randomly chosen from each center's database, and the patient demographics and treatment information were collected. The data were then centralized, and the final analysis was performed at a single institution. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for progression-free survival and mortality, and YO was compared with LO. Site-specific HRs were pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS: Overall, 498 patients, including 224 with YO (129 men; mean age, 37 ± 5.5 years) and 274 with LO (167 men; mean age, 64.8 ± 9.5 years) CRC, were included. At the diagnosis, 137 patients (61.2%) and 122 patients (44.5%) with YO and LO CRC had metastatic disease, respectively. For both cohorts, the 3 most common presenting symptoms were pain, hematochezia, and weight loss. Surgery was performed in 141 YO (63.0%) and 219 LO (79.9%) patients. The longitudinal noncurative treatment patterns were similar, but more biologic therapy was used for these YO patients. The pooled progression-free survival analysis results for first-line noncurative treatment favored LO (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.04-3.68). The mortality analysis showed no significant differences between the 2 groups (YO: HR, 1.53; 95% CI, 0.91-2.58). CONCLUSION: Despite similar treatment patterns and survival outcomes, YO disease might be clinically more aggressive.

Treatment of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Elderly Patients over 75 Years of Age: A Retrospective Series of 129 Patients.

PURPOSE: To better know the presentation and outcome of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in patients above 75 years of age. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with a pancreatic adenocarcinoma seen in the Comprehensive Cancer Center of Marseille between January 2002 and January 2012 was used. RESULTS: During these 10 years, 129 patients older than 75 years of age were seen, 61 females and 68 males, median age 78. At diagnosis, the tumor was metastatic in 45%. First line treatments were: surgical resection in 22 cases, radio-chemotherapy in 20 cases (1 operated on later), systemic chemotherapy in 59 cases, and best supportive care alone in 28 cases. Resection was possible in 19 cases and was R0 in 17; post-operative mortality was 0%, and half received adjuvant chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 43 months with a 2-year overall survival of 64%. For locally advanced tumor, 16 received best supportive care and 33 a specific treatment (20 cases of radio-chemotherapy). Median overall survival was 9.1 months and 2-year overall, survival was 6.1%. Among the 58 metastatic patients, 79% received systemic chemotherapy (most by gemcitabine); tolerance was correct in half. Median overall survival was 4.7 months, with a 2-year overall survival of 5.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is feasible and safe in elderly patients with good outcomes. In advanced and metastatic patients, the outcome is poor despite a correct tolerance of systemic chemotherapy. Randomized trials specially designed for this population are urgently needed.

Treatment of intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-closely associated with liver cirrhosis and, in fact, the main cause of death in patients with such disease-is now recognized as one of the most-prevalent and lethal neoplasms worldwide. Prognosis and allocation of the multiple available treatment options for patients with HCC are influenced not only by tumour stage, but also by the degree of liver-function impairment. Therefore, accurate assessment and classification of disease is important for patient management. According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) algorithm, intermediate-stage HCC is defined as extensive multifocal disease without vascular invasion in patients with preserved liver function and absence of cancer-related symptoms; in this context, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is considered the standard treatment. The use of drug-eluting beads has enabled standardization of this procedure, resulting in higher reproducibility and tolerability of the treatment. Nevertheless, not all patients with intermediate-stage HCC are good candidates for TACE and, for such patients in whom TACE is not appropriate or has failed, other treatments can be considered, including sorafenib. Radioembolization is a promising alternative that deserves further prospective studies. Herein, we review the current approaches used to accurately stratify patients with intermediate-stage HCC and subsequently allocate the most-appropriate treatments. The key developments in therapeutic strategies are also discussed.

[Systemic learning planification for medical students during oncology clinical rotation]. / Planification systématique de l'apprentissage hospitalier de la cancérologie par les étudiants en DCEM. goncalvesa@marseille.fnclcc.fr

The expected increase in cancer incidence emphasizes the need for specific training in this area, including either family physician or specialized oncologists. In France, the fourth to sixth years of medical teaching include both theoretical classes at the university and daily actual practice at the hospital. Thus, clinical rotations are thought to play a major role in the training of medical students and also largely participate to the choice of the student of his/her final specialty. Pedagogic quality of these rotations is dependent on multiple parameters, including a rigorous planification of the expected learning. Here, we reported a systemic planification of learning activities for medical students during an oncology rotation at the Paoli-Calmettes Institute in Marseille, France, a regional comprehensive cancer center. This planification includes an evaluation of learning requirements, definition of learning objectives, selection of learning methods and choice of methods of assessment of the students' achievement of these objectives as well as the learning activity itself.