A manual physical therapy intervention for symptoms of knee osteoarthritis and associated fall risk: A case series of four patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) are at an increased risk of falling. Further, the symptoms associated with knee OA are correlated with fall risk. A manual physical therapy (MPT) approach consisting of mobilizing techniques and reinforcing exercise improves the symptoms and functional limitations associated with knee OA. The purpose of this case series is to evaluate an MPT intervention of mobilization techniques and exercise for knee OA on improving symptoms and quantify the secondary benefit of improving stumble recovery. CASE DESCRIPTION: Four patients with symptomatic knee OA and four matched controls completed a fall risk assessment. Following 4 weeks of intervention, patients were reevaluated. OUTCOMES: Initial Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores indicated notable symptoms and functional limitations in all patients. In addition, all patients displayed elevated fall risk and/or impaired stumble responses. Following 4 weeks of intervention, all patients reported meaningful reductions in all three WOMAC subscales and demonstrated improvements in at least two of the three fall risk measures. DISCUSSION: We identified potential connections between symptom relief in patients with knee OA, stumble response, and ultimately fall risk. The results suggest that MPT intervention designed to improve the signs and symptoms of knee OA may lead to a secondary benefit of improved gait stability and stumble response.

Effectiveness of translational manipulation under interscalene block for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A nonrandomized clinical trial.

Study Design: Nonrandomized controlled trial. Objective: To determine whether translational manipulation under anesthesia/local block (TMUA) adds to the benefit of mobilization and range of motion exercise for improving pain and functional status among patients with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder (AC). Background: TMUA has been shown to improve pain and dysfunction in patients with AC. This intervention has not been directly compared to physical therapy treatment without TMUA in a prospective trial. Methods: Sixteen consecutive patients with a primary diagnosis of AC were divided into two groups. Patients in the first (TMUA) group received a session of translational manipulation under interscalene block, followed by six sessions of manipulation and exercise. Patients in the comparison group received seven sessions of manipulation and exercise. Outcome measures taken at baseline and 3, 6, 12 months and 4 years included Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) scores. Four-year outcomes included percent of normal ratings, medication use, and activity limitations. Results: Both groups showed improved SPADI scores across all follow-up times compared to baseline. The TMUA group showed a greater improvement in SPADI scores than the comparison group at 3 weeks, with no significant differences in SPADI scores at other time points. However, at 4 years, significantly more subjects in the comparison group (5 of 8) had activity limitations versus subjects in the TMUA group (1 of 8). No subject experienced a complication from either intervention protocol. Conclusion: Physical therapy consisting of manual therapy and exercise provides benefit for patients with AC. Translational manipulation under local block may be a useful adjunct to manual therapy and exercise for patients with AC.

Knee extension and stiffness in osteoarthritic and normal knees: a videofluoroscopic analysis of the effect of a single session of manual therapy.

STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive biomechanical study using an experimental repeated-measures design. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the response of participants with and without knee osteoarthritis (OA) to a single session of manual physical therapy. The intervention consisted primarily of joint mobilization techniques, supplemented by exercises, aiming to improve knee extension. BACKGROUND: While manual therapy benefits patients with knee OA, there is limited research quantifying the effects of a manual therapy treatment session on either motion or stiffness of osteoarthritic and normal knees. Methods The study included 5 participants with knee OA and 5 age-, gender-, and body mass index-matched healthy volunteers. Knee extension motion and stiffness were measured with videofluoroscopy before and after a 30-minute manual therapy treatment session. Analysis of variance and intraclass correlation coefficients were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Participants with knee OA had restricted knee extension range of motion at baseline, in contrast to the participants with normal knees, who had full knee extension. After the therapy session, there was a significant increase in knee motion in participants with knee OA (P = .004) but not in those with normal knees (P = .201). For stiffness data, there was no main effect for time (P = .903) or load (P = .274), but there was a main effect of group (P = .012), with the participants with healthy knees having greater stiffness than those with knee OA. Reliability, using intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,3, for knee angle measurements between imaging sessions for all loading conditions was 0.99. Reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient model 3,1) for intraimage measurements was 0.97. CONCLUSION: End-range knee extension stiffness was greater in the participants with normal knees than those with knee OA. The combination of lesser stiffness and lack of motion in those with knee OA, which may indicate the potential for improvement, may explain why increased knee extension angle was observed following a single session of manual therapy in the participants with knee OA but not in those with normal knees. Videofluoroscopy of the knee appears reliable and relevant for future studies attempting to quantify the underlying mechanisms of manual therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2014;44(4):273-282. Epub 25 February 2014. doi:10.2519/jospt.2014.4710.

Knee OA: which patients are unlikely to benefit from manual PT and exercise?

BACKGROUND: The combination of manual physical therapy and exercise provides important benefit for more than 80% of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Our objective was to determine predictor variables for patients unlikely to respond to these interventions. METHODS: We used a retrospective combined cohort study design to develop a preliminary clinical prediction rule (CPR). To determine useful predictors of nonsuccess, we used an extensive set of 167 baseline variables. These variables were extracted from standardized examination forms used with 101 patients(64 women and 37 men with a mean age of 60.5}11.8 and 63.6}9.3 years, respectively) in 2 previously published clinical trials. We classified patients based on whether they achieved a clinically meaningful benefit of at least 12%improvement in Western Ontario MacMaster(WOMAC) scores after 4 weeks of treatment using the smallest and most efficient subset of predictors. RESULTS: The variables of patellofemoral pain, anterior cruciate ligament laxity, and height >1.71 m (5'7'') comprise the CPR. Patients with at least 2 positive tests yield eda posttest probability of 88% for nonsuccess with this treatment (positive likelihood ratio=36.7). The overall prognostic accuracy of the CPR was 96%. CONCLUSION: Most patients with knee OA will benefit from a low-risk, cost-effective program of manual physical therapy and supporting exercise.1,2 The few patients who may not benefit from such a program are identifiable by a simple (preliminary) CPR. After validation,this rule could improve primary patient management,allowing more appropriate referrals and choices in intervention.

Well-tolerated strategies for managing knee osteoarthritis: a manual physical therapist approach to activity, exercise, and advice.

The orthopedic manual physical therapist approach to knee osteoarthritis (OA) is an effective, well-tolerated, and comprehensive strategy that provides a spectrum of intervention measures, which include guidance on activity selection, as well as selection of manual treatment and exercises to systematically address impairments and increase strength and movement in the knee and other related body regions. This approach integrates manually applied treatment while reinforcing exercise and functional activities that are tailored in scope and dose to each patient. Concepts used in the careful design of this exercise program include emphasizing minimal dosing, avoiding exacerbation, using exercises with multiple effects, effective functional positioning, emphasizing the importance of mid-range movements and end-range challenges, and strategic timing of exercises. Focusing on motion and strength gains through range of motion, along with functional or reinforcing activities, such as walking or biking to maintain motion and strength gains, are keys to long-term success. The overarching theme is that well-tolerated strategies using manual treatment, exercise, and activity require deliberate design and targeting of the most common impairments and functional limitations seen in the knee OA population and, more importantly, tailoring to the individual patient.

Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging of the abdominal muscles.

Rehabilitative ultrasound imaging (RUSI) of the abdominal muscles is increasingly being used in the management of conditions involving musculoskeletal dysfunctions associated with the abdominal muscles, including certain types of low back and pelvic pain. This commentary provides an overview of current concepts and evidence related to RUSI of the abdominal musculature, including issues addressing the potential role of ultrasound imaging in the assessment and training of these muscles. Both quantitative and qualitative aspects associated with clinical and research applications are considered, as are the possible limitations related to the interpretation of measurements made with RUSI. Research to date has utilized a range of methodological approaches, including different transducer placements and imaging techniques. The pros and cons of the various methods are discussed, and guidelines for future investigations are presented. Potential implications and opportunities for clinical use of RUSI to enhance evidence-based practice are outlined, as are suggestions for future research to further clarify the possible role of RUSI in the evaluation and treatment of abdominal muscular morphology and function.