Expression of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) and hENT1 predicts survival in pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) tumour expression may provide added value to human equilibrative nucleoside transporter-1 (hENT1) tumour expression in predicting survival following pyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: DPD and hENT1 immunohistochemistry and scoring was completed on tumour cores from 238 patients with pancreatic cancer in the ESPAC-3(v2) trial, randomised to either postoperative gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (5FU/FA). RESULTS: DPD tumour expression was associated with reduced overall survival (hazard ratio, HR = 1.73 [95% confidence interval, CI = 1.21-2.49], p = 0.003). This was significant in the 5FU/FA arm (HR = 2.07 [95% CI = 1.22-3.53], p = 0.007), but not in the gemcitabine arm (HR = 1.47 [0.91-3.37], p = 0.119). High hENT1 tumour expression was associated with increased survival in gemcitabine treated (HR = 0.56 [0.38-0.82], p = 0.003) but not in 5FU/FA treated patients (HR = 1.19 [0.80-1.78], p = 0.390). In patients with low hENT1 tumour expression, high DPD tumour expression was associated with a worse median [95% CI] survival in the 5FU/FA arm (9.7 [5.3-30.4] vs 29.2 [19.5-41.9] months, p = 0.002) but not in the gemcitabine arm (14.0 [9.1-15.7] vs. 18.0 [7.6-15.3] months, p = 1.000). The interaction of treatment arm and DPD expression was not significant (p = 0.303), but the interaction of treatment arm and hENT1 expression was (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: DPD tumour expression was a negative prognostic biomarker. Together with tumour expression of hENT1, DPD tumour expression defined patient subgroups that might benefit from either postoperative 5FU/FA or gemcitabine.

Quality of life and cost effectiveness in a randomized trial of patients with colorectal cancer and peritoneal metastases.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to compare health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) and cost-effectiveness between cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS + IPC) and systemic chemotherapy for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases. METHODS: Patients included in the Swedish Peritoneal Trial comparing CRS + IPC and systemic chemotherapy completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and SF-36 questionnaires at baseline, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. HRQOL at 24 months was the primary endpoint. EORTC sum score, SF-36 physical and mental component scores at 24 months were calculated and compared for each arm and then referenced against general population values. Two quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) indices were applied (EORTC-8D and SF-6D) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY gained was calculated. A projected life-time ICER per QALY gained was calculated using predicted survival according to Swedish population statistics. RESULTS: No statistical differences in HRQOL between the arms were noted at 24 months. Descriptively, survivors in the surgery arm had higher summary scores than the general population at 24 months, whereas survivors in the chemotherapy arm had lower scores. The projected life-time QALY benefit was 3.8 QALYs in favor of the surgery arm (p=0.06) with an ICER per QALY gained at 310,000 SEK (EORTC-8D) or 362,000 SEK (SF-6D) corresponding to 26,700-31,200 GBP. CONCLUSION: The HRQOL in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases undergoing CRS + IPC appear similar to those receiving systemic chemotherapy. Two-year survivors in the CRS + IPC arm have comparable HRQOL to a general population reference. The treatment is cost-effective according to NICE guidelines.

Postoperative chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer receiving preoperative radio(chemo)therapy: A meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing surgery ± a fluoropyrimidine and surgery + a fluoropyrimidine ± oxaliplatin.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the role of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer who have received preoperative radio(chemo)therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed of trials that used preoperative radio(chemo)therapy and randomized patients either between postoperative chemotherapy and observation or between a fluoropyrimidine only (FU-only) and a fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin (FU-OXA) as postoperative chemotherapy. RESULTS: Five randomized studies compared postoperative chemotherapy with observation in a total of 2398 patients. None of these trials demonstrated a statistically significant benefit of chemotherapy for OS and DFS. The pooled differences in OS and DFS did not differ statistically significantly between the chemotherapy group and the observation group. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were 0.95 (CI: 0.82-1.10), P = 0.49 and 0.92 (CI: 0.80-1.04), P = 0.19, respectively. In the subgroup of trials in which randomization was performed after surgery (n = 753), a statistically significant positive pooled chemotherapy effect was observed for DFS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-1.00, P = 0.047), but not for OS (P = 0.39). Four randomized trials compared adjuvant FU-OXA with adjuvant FU-only in 2710 patients. In two trials, the difference in DFS between groups was statistically significant in favour of FU-OXA, and in the other two trials, the difference was not significant. The pooled difference in DFS between the FU-OXA group and the FU-only group was not statistically significant: HR = 0.84 (CI: 0.66-1.06), P = 0.15. CONCLUSION: The use of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with rectal cancer receiving preoperative radio(chemo)therapy is not based on strong scientific evidence.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision: a Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) randomized phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: The discussion on the role of adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated according to current guidelines is still ongoing. A multicentre, randomized phase III trial, PROCTOR-SCRIPT, was conducted to compare adjuvant chemotherapy with observation for rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision (TME). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PROCTOR-SCRIPT trial recruited patients from 52 hospitals. Patients with histologically proven stage II or III rectal adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to observation or adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and TME. Radiotherapy consisted of 5 × 5 Gy. Chemoradiotherapy consisted of 25 × 1.8-2 Gy combined with 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 5-FU/LV (PROCTOR) or eight courses capecitabine (SCRIPT). Randomization was based on permuted blocks of six, stratified according to centre, residual tumour, time between last irradiation and surgery, and preoperative treatment. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: Of 470 enrolled patients, 437 were eligible. The trial closed prematurely because of slow patient accrual. Patients were randomly assigned to observation (n = 221) or adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 216). After a median follow-up of 5.0 years, 5-year overall survival was 79.2% in the observation group and 80.4% in the chemotherapy group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62-1.39; P = 0.73]. The HR for disease-free survival was 0.80 (95% CI 0.60-1.07; P = 0.13). Five-year cumulative incidence for locoregional recurrences was 7.8% in both groups. Five-year cumulative incidence for distant recurrences was 38.5% and 34.7%, respectively (P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: The PROCTOR-SCRIPT trial could not demonstrate a significant benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy with fluoropyrimidine monotherapy after preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and TME on overall survival, disease-free survival, and recurrence rate. However, this trial did not complete planned accrual. REGISTRATION NUMBER: Dutch Colorectal Cancer group, CKTO 2003-16, ISRCTN36266738.

Quality of life in patients with advanced gastric cancer sequentially treated with docetaxel and irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (leucovin).

With a median overall survival of only 9-13 months in patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC), the quality of life (QoL) during the palliative treatment remains a key issue. Furthermore, when combinations of two or three drugs are used, the impact on QoL should be carefully evaluated. This was studied within the GATAC trial in patients sequentially treated with docetaxel and irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-Fu/Lv). Patients with previously untreated advanced GC were randomly assigned to start with docetaxel 45 mg/m(2) (arm T) or irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) (arm C) with bolus and 44 h infusion of 5-Fu/Lv (D1, q2 weeks). After four courses, there was a prescheduled crossover to the alternative regimen for four additional courses. QoL was measured with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at the start of the treatment, at crossover and after completing treatment with both regimens. Eighty-one patients were randomized, and 78 patients started treatment. A total of 191 completed QoL questionnaires were collected. There were no statistically significant differences in QoL scores between the two treatment groups and no changes in mean scores during the 16 weeks of treatment. During the last 8 weeks of treatment, a significantly larger portion of patients with radiological response reported sustained or better QoL scores than those with no radiological response (82 vs. 50%, p = 0.007). Chemotherapy in advanced GC did not affect QoL average scores. Patients with non-responding tumours reported more often a decline in the global QoL score. The concept of the pre-scheduled switch of chemotherapy regimens prior to progression should be further studied in this disease, as it appears effective, tolerable and not to negatively affect QoL.

RAS mutations and cetuximab in locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the EXPERT-C trial.

BACKGROUND: RAS mutations predict resistance to anti-epidermal growthfactor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies in metastatic colorectal cancer. We analysed RAS mutations in 30 non-metastatic rectal cancer patients treated with or without cetuximab within the 31 EXPERT-C trial. METHODS: Ninety of 149 patients with tumours available for analysis were KRAS/BRAF wild-type, and randomly assigned to capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) followed by chemoradiotherapy, surgery and adjuvant CAPOX or the same regimen plus cetuximab (CAPOX-C). Of these, four had a mutation of NRAS exon 3, and 84 were retrospectively analysed for additional KRAS (exon 4) and NRAS (exons 2/4) mutations by using bi-directional Sanger sequencing. The effect of cetuximab on study end-points in the RAS wild-type population was analysed. RESULTS: Eleven (13%) of 84 patients initially classified as KRAS/BRAF wild-type were found to have a mutation in KRAS exon 4 (11%) or NRAS exons 2/4 (2%). Overall, 78/149 (52%) assessable patients were RAS wild-type (CAPOX, n=40; CAPOX-C, n=38). In this population, after a median follow-up of 63.8months, in line with the initial analysis, the addition of cetuximab was associated with numerically higher, but not statistically significant, rates of complete response (15.8% versus 7.5%, p=0.31), 5-year progression-free survival (75.5% versus 67.5%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.61, p=0.25) and 5-year overall survival (83.8% versus 70%, HR 0.54, p=0.20). CONCLUSIONS: RAS mutations beyond KRAS exon 2 and 3 were identified in 17% of locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Given the small sample size, no definitive conclusions on the effect of additional RAS mutations on cetuximab treatment in this setting can be drawn and further investigation of RAS in larger studies is warranted.

HER2 in high-risk rectal cancer patients treated in EXPERT-C, a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with or without cetuximab.

BACKGROUND: HER2 is an established therapeutic target in breast and gastric cancers. The role of HER2 in rectal cancer is unclear, as conflicting data on the prevalence of HER2 expression in this disease have been reported. We evaluated the prevalence of HER2 and its impact on the outcome of high-risk rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant CAPOX and CRT±cetuximab in the EXPERT-C trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients with available tumour tissue for HER2 analysis were included. HER2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in pre-treatment biopsies and/or surgical specimens (score 0-3+). Immunostaining was scored according to the consensus panel recommendations on HER2 scoring for gastric cancer. Tumours with equivocal IHC result (2+) were tested for HER2 amplification by D-ISH. Tumours with IHC 3+ or D-ISH ratio ≥2.0 were classified as HER2+. The impact of HER2 on primary and secondary end points of the study was analysed. RESULTS: Of 164 eligible study patients, 104 (63%) biopsy and 114 (69%) surgical specimens were available for analysis. Only 3 of 104 (2.9%) and 3 of 114 (2.6%) were HER2+, respectively. In 77 patients with paired specimens, concordance for HER2 status was found in 74 (96%). Overall, 141 patients were assessable for HER2 and 6 out of 141 (4.3%) had HER2 overexpression and/or amplification. The median follow-up was 58.6 months. HER2 was not associated with a difference in the outcome for any of the study end points, including in the subset of 90 KRAS/BRAF wild-type patients treated±cetuximab. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the low prevalence of expression as recorded in the EXPERT-C trial, HER2 does not appear to represent a useful therapeutic target in high-risk rectal cancer. However, the role of HER2 as a potential predictive biomarker of resistance to anti-EGFR-based treatments and a therapeutic target in anti-EGFR refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN Register: 99828560.

A randomized study comparing short-time infusion of oxaliplatin in combination with capecitabine XELOX(30) and chronomodulated XELOX(30) as first-line therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chronotherapy is one of the several approaches to increase efficacy and reduce toxicity of chemotherapy. In a phase II study in the second-line in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), we found that chronomodulated XELOX (XELOX(30Chron)) was a well-tolerated regimen with potentially reduced toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and forty-one patients with unresectable mCRC were enrolled in a randomized study comparing standard XELOX (XELOX(30)), arm A, and XELOX(30Chron), arm B-both with short-time infusion of oxaliplatin-with the primary aim of reducing overall toxicity. RESULTS: Overall toxicity grade 2-4 was 90% versus 85%, P = 0.47 and grade 3-4 was 31% versus 37%, P = 0.6 in arm A and B, respectively. We found no significant differences in median overall survival (17.6 versus 15.5 months; P = 0.068) and median progression-free survival (8.9 versus 8.8 months; P = 0.7). The incidence of grade 3 neuropathy was 16% in arm A and 19% in arm B (P = 0.7) after a cumulative dose of oxaliplatin of 1000 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: XELOX(30Chron) does not reduce toxicity or improve efficacy. A 30-min infusion of oxaliplatin is safe and does not increase the severity of chronic neuropathy.

Systemic exposure of the parent drug oxaliplatin during hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the perfusate and systemic kinetics of oxaliplatin during hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using a selective analytical technique. METHODS: HIPEC was carried out in eight patients by the open abdomen coliseum technique for 30 min at 41.5-43 degrees C with an average of 427 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin in 5% dextrose solution. Blood and perfusate samples were collected during the perfusion. Additional blood samples were taken up to 2 h after the end of perfusion. The analysis was performed by liquid chromatography and post-column derivatization with N,N-diethyldithiocarbamate using microwave heating. RESULTS: The mean elimination half-life of oxaliplatin in the perfusate was 29.5 min (range 21.1-41.2 min) and in the peripheral circulation 24.7 min (range 21.7-27.7 min). The ratio of the areas under the time concentration curve in perfusate and blood was 12.8 +/- 2.9. CONCLUSION: The systemic exposure of oxaliplatin measured after HIPEC using a selective analytical technique is considerably lower than previously reported results obtained by atomic absorption spectroscopy.

Efficacy of 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Recently published population-based investigations showed elderly patients to be underrepresented in clinical trials and less often treated according to the standard therapy. Although there is evidence that elderly patients benefit from adjuvant (radio-) chemotherapy to the same extent as younger patients, no large series describes the influence of age on efficacy of chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis using source data of 3825 patients who received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-containing treatment in 22 European trials and identified 629 patients with an age of > or = 70 years. RESULTS: We found an equal overall survival in elderly patients [10.8 months, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.7-11.8] and in younger patients (11.3 months, 95% CI 10.9-11.7; P = 0.31). Response rate did not differ between age groups > or = 70 and <70 years (23.9% and 21.1%; respectively; P = 0.14). Progression-free survival was marginally prolonged in elderly patients (5.5 months, 95% CI 5.2-5.8; compared with 5.3 months, 95% CI 5.1-5.5; P = 0.01). In both age groups, infusional 5-FU resulted in significantly increased response rates, overall survival and progression-free survival compared with bolus 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: 'Fit' elderly patients benefit at least to the same extent from palliative chemotherapy with 5-FU as younger patients. Infusional 5-FU was shown to be more effective than bolus 5-FU in both age groups. Therefore, standardized palliative chemotherapy should generally be offered to elderly patients and they should not be excluded from clinical trials.

Phase I study of UFT plus leucovorin with radiotherapy in patients with inextirpable non-rectal gastrointestinal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy is increasingly used in the primary management of patients with loco-regionally advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Oral chemotherapy with uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin (LV) may represent a convenient way of delivering protracted infusion of fluorouracil. Our goal was to evaluate the safety of UFT plus LV combined with radiation and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and a recommended dose for further testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inextirpable GI cancer received escalating doses of UFT (starting at 300 mg/m(2)/d with 50 mg/m(2)/d increments between consecutive cohorts) and fixed doses of LV (90 mg/d). UFT and LV were given 5 days per week concurrently with radiation to 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction). RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated, and 22 received the planned treatment. Three patients were withdrawn from treatment, two due to disease-progression and one due to toxicity. The MTD of UFT with radiation was 400 mg/m(2)/d with 90 mg/d of LV. Diarrhoea was the main dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Since some toxicity (3/12 DLTs) was seen in the expanded cohort at the level below, but none (0/9 DLT) at the starting level, the recommended dose chosen for further testing is 300-350 mg/m(2)/d depending upon the size of the target volume. CONCLUSION: Concomitant chemoradiation with oral UFT plus LV is feasible and well tolerated and should be further investigated since tumour responses were frequently seen.

Chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer--is there an optimal combination?

PURPOSE: Chemoradiotherapy is increasingly used in the primary management of rectal cancer. A critical review of present knowledge of whether an optimal combination exists was made for each of the major clinical situations. RESULTS: As preoperative therapy to reduce local recurrence rates in primarily resectable rectal cancers, radiotherapy has almost exclusively been used as single modality, and combined chemoradiotherapy should remain experimental until further evidence is available. This can only be achieved in randomised trials. Postoperatively, a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy appears to be more efficient in reducing local failure rates and improving survival than either modality alone, but the literature-based evidence is partly conflicting. As a reference treatment, a combination of continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and radiotherapy can be advocated based upon one trial. In primarily irresectable cancer, there is some support that chemoradiotherapy may be more efficient than radiotherapy alone in causing tumour regression allowing radical surgery, but the literature is again conflicting. A great number of phase II studies have been performed in these cancers and in those considered to be locally advanced, revealing promising activity and claims of superiority to radiotherapy alone or other schedules. The studies are, however, inconclusive with respect to antitumour activity, and patient selection may be of greater relevance for the results. Chemoradiation has also increasingly been used to facilitate a sphincter-preserving procedure in low-lying cancers. Again, literature is inconclusive as to whether an optimal combination exists, whether it is superior to radiotherapy alone, or if it actually facilitates sphincter preservation at all. Long-term functional outcome is poorly known. Again, 5-FU has been most extensively used, but many other drugs are presently being tested in various combinations. CONCLUSIONS: An optimal combination of chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer does not exist. Actually, a critical review of the literature shows that the support for superiority of chemoradiation over radiation alone is weak, or lacking. There is a great need of both more conclusive study designs and a more rational exploration of drug-radiation interactions prior to clinical testing.

A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in colorectal cancer.

A systematic review of chemotherapy trials in several tumour types was performed by The Swedish Council of Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). The procedures for the evaluation of the scientific literature are described separately (Acta Oncol 2001; 40: 155-65). This synthesis of the literature on adjuvant and palliative therapy with cytostatics for colorectal cancer is based on 208 scientific articles, including eight meta-analyses and 162 randomised studies. These studies involve approximately 126,800 patients. The conclusions reached can be summarized into the following points: The benefit of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and levamisole in patients with colon cancer stage Dukes' C was demonstrated more than ten years ago in two phase III trials. There was a reduction of recurrence from 56% to 39% and reduction of death from 51% to 40% after more than five years of follow-up. Although this combination has been widely accepted as standard adjuvant treatments for stage Dukes' C colon cancer, there is still debate on whether adjuvant treatment with fluorouracil alone would be equally efficacious. Several phase III trials with postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with colon cancer stage Dukes' C have demonstrated a similar statistically significant improvement in disease-free and overall survival in comparison with a control arm. Six months of treatment with fluorouracil and leucovorin is as efficient as twelve months of fluorouracil and levamisole. This treatment is, thus, recommended for routine use. No convincing benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy is proven in colon cancer stage Dukes' B although some randomised trials have shown the same relative survival gain as seen in stage Dukes' C. There is less knowledge on survival benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy for Dukes' stage B and C rectal cancer. In small randomised trials, postoperative radiochemotherapy has, however, improved survival to the same extent as chemotherapy in colon cancer Dukes' stage C. A meta-analysis of nine randomised trials revealed a small but statistically significant benefit in five-year survival and a reduction in the risk of death for the patients receiving immediate postoperative portal vein infusion compared with controls. At present, however, the use of portal vein infusion or intraperitoneal therapy outside of a research trial cannot be recommended in the light of the limited effects. This conclusion is further supported by similarly limited effects in two recently reported very large European multicentre trials. In advanced colorectal cancer, chemotherapy may prolong survival, decrease tumour-related symptoms, improve general well-being or maintain it at a high level for a longer time period compared with best supportive care. These effects have been seen using systemic chemotherapy and using regional chemotherapy in patients with metastases limited to the liver. Subjective responses and quality of life improvements are seen more frequently than objective tumour remissions. Although the impact on overall survival is modest, i.e. an improvement in median survival of five to six months, treatment is recommended also outside clinical trials. High-dose infusional regimens with modulated fluorouracil may turn out to be superior to conventional bolus regimens, since they result in more tumour regressions, longer times to disease progression and possibly longer survival. A plateau seems, however, to have been reached with fluorouracil, giving objective response rates of up to 30% to 40% with a variety of modulators. Randomised studies of regional therapy, mostly hepatic arterial infusions, of liver metastases in colorectal patients have demonstrated significantly higher response rates than systemic fluorouracil therapy alone without impact on overall survival. The importance of the higher response rates for patient benefit in the predominantly asymptomatic patients with isolated liver metastasis remains to be elucidated. Regional therapy in advanced disease cannot be recommended outside of clinical trials. New cytotoxic agents are emerging with antitumour activity similar to fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. The addition of oxaliplatin or irinotecan to existing fluorouracil regimens improves response rates and duration of response, and possibly overall survival. Based upon the results of two randomised studies, there is a role for irinotecan as second line therapy for selected patients who have failed first-line therapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin. The role of these agents, alone or in combinations, in clinical routine remains, however, to be determined due to more pronounced toxicity than caused b

A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in pancreatic cancer.

A systematic review of chemotherapy trials in several tumour types was performed by The Swedish Council of Technology Assessment in Health Care (SBU). The procedures for the evaluation of the scientific literature are described separately (Acta Oncol 2001; 40:155-65). The conclusions of this overview in pancreatic cancer are based on 10 randomised studies with, and 18 randomised studies without, an untreated control group. Altogether, 4,028 patients were included in the phase III studies. Furthermore, 32 phase II studies or retrospective analyses including 1,404 patients have been evaluated. The conclusions reached can be summarized into the following points: There is no convincing evidence that pancreatic cancer patients benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy treatment, with or without concomitant radiotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer should thus not be used routinely. In locally advanced/metastatic pancreatic cancer, six randomised trials comparing combination chemotherapy with an untreated control group were retrieved. In three trials, two of which were performed recently, chemotherapy provided statistically significant prolongation in median survival in the range of three to nine months. The three other trials, all reported in the early 80s, essentially showed no difference in survival between the treatment groups. In the locally advanced/metastatic setting there are also several randomised trials comparing various chemotherapy regimens. Except for an improvement in median survival of one to two months from gemcitabine compared with 5-FU, no differences were observed. There is no convincing evidence that a large fraction of pancreatic cancer patients will benefit from palliative chemotherapy. The few open-design studies that have explored the influence on symptom relief/quality of life indicate that between 20-35% of the patients get clinical benefit, but usually short-lived. Recently performed randomised studies, all using adequate methodology, indicate that the beneficial effects observed in advanced pancreatic cancer are similar to those of accepted therapy in other cancer types. However, due to the limited positive effects, palliative chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer can only be recommended selectively and should preferably be used within controlled clinical trials exploring new treatment combinations or concepts.

New directions in the treatment of colorectal cancer: a look to the future.

Today, adjuvant 5-fluorouracil based therapy is known to significantly reduce the relapse rates and the risks of dying from resected colon cancer; chemotherapy approximately doubles overall survival of advanced colorectal cancer and second line treatment prolongs the survival of patients compared with best supportive care. At the molecular level a number of key genes are often mutated in cancer of the colon and some of these key regulators of apoptosis are discussed (p53 and bcl-2 family of proteins). Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity may be a potential factor controlling fluorouracil (FU) responsiveness at the tumoral level and its importance is stressed. The rationale of combining FU with DPD inhibitors is fairly strong. Ethynyluracil, UFT and S1 pursue this strategy while capecitabine has another the rationale. Drug resistance should be at least partially overcome by combination chemotherapy (FU plus mitomycin, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) and combined modality (FU+RT) regimens. Improved surgical techniques and radiotherapy have substantially decreased local failure rates for rectal cancers. Finally, innovative treatment modalities such as anti-angiogenetic and antimetastatic agents, farnesyl transferase inhibitors, vaccine and gene therapy are in early clinical trials.

Treatment outcome in patients younger than 60 years with advanced stages (IIB-IV) of Hodgkin's disease: the Swedish National Health Care Programme experience.

BACKGROUND: Despite improved treatment results achieved in Hodgkin's disease (HD), only about 70% of patients with advanced stages are cured. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of advanced stages (IIB-IVB) of HD in younger patients in an unselected population-based group of patients. The patients were recommended individualized treatment with respect to number of chemotherapy (CT) courses and post-CT radiotherapy (RT) based on pretreatment characteristics and tumour response. Secondly, we investigated if variables of prognostic importance could be detected. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1985-92, 307 patients between 17-59 yr of age (median 36) were diagnosed with HD in stages IIB-IVB in 5/6 health care regions in Sweden. Median follow-up time was 7.8 yr (1.3-13). Retrospectively, laboratory parameters were collected. RESULTS: In total, 267 (87%) patients had a complete response (CR). The overall and disease-free 10-yr survivals in the whole cohort were 76% and 67%, respectively. There was no difference in survival between the groups of patients who received 6 or 8 cycles of CT. Survival was not higher for patients in CR after CT when RT was added. For those in PR after CT, additional RT raised the frequencies of CR. A selected group of pathologically staged patients was successfully treated with a short course (2 cycles) of CT + RT. In univariate analyses survival was affected by age, stage IVB, bone-marrow involvement, B-symptoms, S-LDH, S-Alb and reaching CR or not after 2, 4 and 6 cycles of CT. In a multivariate analysis, age and reaching CR after 6 cycles of CT remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of difference in survival between the groups of patients who received 6 versus 8 cycles of CT indicates a successful selection of patients for the shorter treatment. Reaching a rapid CR significantly affected outcome. Whether some patients need less CT than the generally recommended 8 courses can properly only be evaluated in a randomised study. Additional RT may play a role in successful outcome, particularly if residual tumours are present, but its precise role can also only be defined in prospectively randomised studies. Reaching CR after CT was the most important variable affecting survival besides age.

Bolus injection (2-4 min) versus short-term (10-20 min) infusion of 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a prospective randomised trial. Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumour Adjuvant Therapy Group.

The use of bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as a short-term infusion over 10-30 min is increasing at the cost of a push injection, mainly due to practical advantages. Since even a short prolongation of the administration time results in lower 5-FU peak and area under the curve (AUC) levels, there might be a risk of decreased efficacy. The aim of this study was to compare a rapid intravenous (i.v.) 5-FU injection and a short-term 5-FU infusion with respect to objective responses and toxicity in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. 203 patients with measurable advanced colorectal cancer were randomised to bolus 5-FU either as an injection for 2-4 min or as a short-term infusion lasting 10-20 min. In both groups, the 5-FU dose was 500 mg/m2 and leucovorin 60 mg/m2 was given 40 min after the start of 5-FU. Treatment was given on two successive days every other week until progression. Objective tumour regression was seen in 27/100 (27%) in the injection group and in 13/103 (13%) in the infusion group (P = 0.02). Severe toxicity was rare and did not differ significantly between the groups. Progression-free survival tended to be longer in the injection group (P = 0.07), but overall survival did not differ between the groups. Bolus 5-FU should be administered as a rapid i.v. injection rather than as a short-term infusion, since the former rate of administration results in a higher response rate without being significantly more toxic.

Information to and communication with cancer patients: improvements and psychosocial correlates in a comprehensive care program for patients and their relatives.

Between 1987 and 1989, 177 cancer patients who were to receive intensive chemotherapy with curative intention, participated in a comprehensive care project with the aim of improving their total situation, and that of their relatives (n = 120). A number of steps were taken to improve, among other things, the information to, and communication with, patients and their relatives. Compared with a pre-project evaluation in 54 patients and 24 relatives, significantly lower problem scores were seen in most aspects relating to interaction with medical staff. Strong associations were seen between, on the one hand, various aspects of patient- and relative-staff interaction and, on the other, psychosocial problems, although they were weaker for problems relating to information, than for communication and control problems.

Experimental colonic healing in relation to timing of 5-fluorouracil therapy.

In an experimental study resembling clinical use of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) treatment of colorectal carcinoma, 97 male Wistar rats were operated on with a standardized left colonic resection. Treatment was given as a daily intraperitoneal injection. The animals were randomized to one of four groups: early treatment with 5-FU 20 mg/kg or saline 0.1 mol/l from the day of operation to day 7 after operation, and delayed treatment with 5-FU 20 mg/kg or saline 0.1 mol/l from the third day after operation to the day before killing. The animals were killed in groups on day 7 or 10 after operation. In the group receiving early 5-FU treatment there was an increased rate of anastomotic complications (seven of 26) compared with none in the control or delayed 5-FU groups. The anastomotic breaking strength in animals having early 5-FU treatment (day 7, median 1.45 (range 0.20-2.95) N; day 10, median 1.80 (range 0.95-3.20) N) was significantly lower than that in controls on both day 7 (median 3.20 (range 2.50-3.80)N) and day 10 (median 3.20 (range 2.20-3.60)N). In the delayed 5-FU treatment group anastomotic breaking strength did not differ from that in controls. Colonic healing was not impaired when intraperitoneal 5-FU treatment was started on day 3 after operation, whereas immediate postoperative administration of 5-FU had a detrimental effect on wound healing.

Adjuvant intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil and intravenous leucovorin after colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized phase II placebo-controlled study.

Fifty patients were randomized to receive adjuvant intraperitoneal 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 500 mg/m2/day) and intravenous leucovorin (60 mg/m2/day) and 51 to receive placebo after curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Treatment started on the day after surgery and continued for 6 days. One case of stomatitis, one of leucopenia and one case of abnormal liver function tests were the only chemotherapy-related toxic effects. From the second day of treatment, pain during intraperitoneal infusions occurred more frequently in the 5-FU group, although statistical significance was only attained on day 2 (P < 0.05). The groups did not differ substantially regarding any other adverse effects, the incidence of surgical complications, second laparotomies, time from surgery to discharge, or premature treatment terminations. The postoperative course after intraperitoneal 5-FU and intravenous leucovorin was thus not more complicated than that in patients treated with placebo. The tolerance was acceptable and chemotherapy-related toxicity was rare. Thus important prerequisites exist for more widespread use of the present regimen in order to evaluate its impact on survival.