Upfront Alternative Donor Transplant versus Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia Who Lack a Fully HLA-Matched Related Donor: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Retrospective Studies, on Behalf of the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Idiopathic aplastic anemia is a rare and life-threatening disorder, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from a matched sibling donor (MSD) is the standard treatment strategy for young patients. Alternative donor transplantation (ADT) from a matched unrelated donor or an HLA haploidentical donor is not commonly used in the frontline setting. This systematic review/meta-analysis was conducted to compare ADT as an upfront, rather than delayed, treatment strategy in the absence of an MSD to immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in severe aplastic anemia (SAA). We searched PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase (1998 to 2019) for studies that compared the outcomes of ADT with IST as upfront therapy in patients with SAA. We included studies with 5 patients or more in each arm. Studies that included patients with inherited forms of bone marrow failure syndromes were excluded. The primary outcome was the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate. Five studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled 5-year odds ratio (OR) for OS was statistically significant at 0.44 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.85) in favor of upfront ADT. In addition, survival was compared between upfront ADT versus salvage ADT in 6 studies. The pooled 5-year OR for OS was statistically significant at 0.31 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.64) in favor of upfront ADT. Although this analysis has some limitations, including the retrospective nature of the included studies, the lack of ethnic diversity, the predominantly pediatric population, and the relatively suboptimal IST regimen used in some of the studies, it indicates that upfront ADT is a potential alternative treatment option in young and pediatric SAA patients who lack an HLA identical sibling donor, particularly when optimal IST is not available. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation in allogeneic stem-cell transplantation: relationship between viral load, EBV-specific T-cell reconstitution and rituximab therapy.

BACKGROUND: Monitoring of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation after allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation markedly improved with quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction amplification of EBV DNA and visualization of EBV-specific CD8+ T cells with peptide-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I tetramers. We decided to combine these methods to evaluate posttransplant EBV reactivation and rituximab therapy. METHODS: We followed 56 patients treated with an HLA-genoidentical sibling (n=32), an HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n=19), or an unrelated cord-blood transplant (n=5). EBV DNA was quantified in plasma and in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Patient CD8+ T cells were stained with a panel of eight tetramers. RESULTS: EBV DNA was detected in half of the patients, mainly in the MUD group (17/19). In 19 patients, viral DNA was detected only in the cellular compartment. All patients who controlled reactivation without rituximab and despite a viral load of greater than 500 genome equivalents (gEq)/150,000 PBMC mounted an EBV-specific CD8+ T-cell response in greater than 1.4% of CD3+CD8+ T cells. Plasmatic EBV genome was found in nine patients preceded by a high cellular viral load. Three of these patients controlled the reactivation before or without the introduction of rituximab, and they all developed a significant and increasing EBV-specific T-cell response. Patients with EBV-specific T cells at the onset of reactivation controlled viral reactivation without rituximab. CONCLUSION: This study emphasizes the benefit of an early and close monitoring of EBV reactivation and CD8+-specific immune responses to initiate rituximab only when necessary and before the immune response becomes overwhelmed by the viral burden.