The Effect of Commonly Used Local Anesthetic on Bacterial Growth.

INTRODUCTION: Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) has emerged as a superior form of local anesthetic across numerous surgical subspecialties. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ex-vivo antimicrobial effects of LB in comparison with traditional local anesthetics. METHODS: A standardized inoculum of bacteria commonly associated with surgical site infection was inoculated into a suspension of 1% lidocaine, 0.25% bupivacaine, Exparel (proprietary liposomally packaged 1.3% bupivacaine), and normal saline as a growth control. RESULTS: In all five bacteria tested, the medium inoculated with traditional local anesthetics reduced growth to a greater degree than LB-inoculated plates. Both conventional local anesthetics reduced the growth of all bacteria when compared with the control with the exception of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus growth in bupivacaine. LB-inoculated plates had equivalent growth to the control in all plates with the exception of Escherichia coli plates which demonstrated superior growth. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this simple ex-vivo model suggest that the liposomal packaging of bupivacaine may decrease this local anesthetic's innate antibacterial properties.

Anastomotic leak rate after low anterior resection for rectal cancer after chemoradiation therapy.

Anastomotic leak may be the most concerning complication after colorectal anastomosis. To compare open with laparoscopic rectal resection, we must have accurate leak rates in patients who have received neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy to serve as a benchmark for comparison. All patients who had preoperative chemoradiation therapy with rectal resection and low pelvic anastomosis for cancer in a single colorectal practice over a 7-year period were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had proximal diversion and a contrast enema study before stoma reversal. Eighty-seven consecutive patients were included in the study. Average age was 58 years. Fifty-nine per cent of patients were male. Sixty-six per cent were smokers. Pathologic T stage was 5 per cent T0, 16 per cent T1, 28 per cent T2, 47 per cent T3, and 5 per cent T4. Seventy-five per cent of patients were pathologically lymph node-negative. Average time to stoma reversal was 122 days. Total anastomotic leak rate was 10.3 per cent (8% clinical leaks). Five (56%) patients with leak successfully underwent reversal of their diverting stoma (average time to reversal, 290 days). Patients who had the complication of anastomotic leakage had less likelihood of stoma reversal and a significantly prolonged time to stoma reversal.

Longer time interval between completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection does not improve downstaging of rectal carcinoma.

PURPOSE: An interval of six to eight weeks between completion of preoperative chemoradiation therapy and surgical resection of advanced rectal cancer has been described. Our purpose was to determine whether a longer time interval between completion of therapy and resection increases tumor downstaging and affects perioperative morbidity. METHODS: Forty patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the rectum underwent preoperative chemoradiation on a prospective trial with irinotecan (50 mg/m2), 5-fluorouracil (225 mg/m2), and concomitant external-beam radiation (45-54 Gy) followed by complete surgical resection of the tumor with total mesorectal excision. The time interval between completion of chemoradiation and surgical resection ranged from 28 to 97 days. The patients were divided into two groups with 33 eligible patients: Group A (4-week to 8-week time interval; 28-56 days) and Group B (10-week to 14-week interval; 67-97 days). Tumor downstaging was compared between these two groups. The number of patients downstaged by at least one T stage, those downstaged by at least one N stage, those with pathologic complete responses, and those with only residual microscopic tumor foci were compared. Postoperative length of stay, estimated blood loss, perioperative morbidity, and sphincter-sparing procedures were also compared. Chi-squared tests and Student's t-test were calculated. RESULTS: Group A had 19 patients, and Group B had 14 patients. Patient demographics were comparable. Mean age was 52 years, and 70 percent of patients were male. There were no deaths. There were no statistical differences in perioperative morbidity, with three anastomotic leaks in Group A. Tumors were downstaged in 58 percent of patients in Group A and 43 percent of those in Group B (P = 0.61). Nodal downstaging occurred in 78 percent of Group A and 67 percent of Group B (P = 0.9). The pathologic complete response rate was 21 percent in Group A and 14 percent in Group B (P = 0.97), and a residual microfocus of tumor was found in 33 percent of patients in Group A and 42 percent of those in Group B (P = 0.90). These differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative morbidity is not affected by longer intervals. A longer interval between completion of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and surgical resection may not increase the tumor response rate of advanced rectal cancer in this cohort.