RESUMO
Purpose To demonstrate the feasibility of using chemical shift fat-water MRI methods to visualize and measure intrahepatic delivery of ethiodized oil to liver tumors following conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE). Materials and Methods Twenty-eight participants (mean age, 66 years ± 8 [SD]; 22 men) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with cTACE were evaluated with follow-up chemical shift MRI in this Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant prospective, institutional review board-approved study. Uptake of ethiodized oil was evaluated at 1-month follow-up chemical shift MRI. Measurements of tumor size (MRI and CT), attenuation and enhancement (CT), fat content percentage, and tumor:normal ratio (MRI) were compared by lesion for responders versus nonresponders, as assessed with modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Adverse events and overall survival by the Kaplan-Meier method were secondary end points. Results Focal tumor ethiodized oil retention was 46% (12 of 26 tumors) at 24 hours and 47% (18 of 38 tumors) at 1 month after cTACE. Tumor volume at CT did not differ between EASL-defined responders and nonresponders (P = .06). Tumor ethiodized oil volume measured with chemical shift MRI was statistically significantly higher for EASL-defined nonresponders (P = .02). Doxorubicin dosing (P = .53), presence of focal fat (P = .83), and a combined end point of focal fat and low doxorubicin dosing (P = .97) did not stratify overall survival after cTACE. Conclusion Chemical shift MRI allowed for assessment of tumor delivery of ethiodized oil out to 1 month after cTACE in participants with HCC and demonstrated tumor ethiodized oil volume as a potential tool for stratification of tumor response by EASL criteria. Keywords: MRI, Chemical Shift Imaging, CT, Hepatic Chemoembolization, Ethiodized Oil Clinicaltrials.gov registration no.: NCT02173119 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Quimioembolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Óleo Etiodado/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Estudos Prospectivos , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/métodos , Doxorrubicina , Imageamento por Ressonância MagnéticaRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) is used to treat patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Radioembolization is a minimally invasive procedure that involves implantation of radioactive micron-sized particles loaded with yttrium-90 (Y90) inside the blood vessels that supply a tumor. We performed a randomized, phase 2 study to compare the effects of cTACE and Y90 radioembolization in patients with HCC. METHODS: From October 2009 through October 2015, we reviewed patients with HCC of all Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages for eligibility. Of these, 179 patients with BCLC stages A or B met our enrollment criteria and were candidates for cTACE or Y90 therapy. Patients were assigned randomly to groups that received Y90 therapy (n = 24; 50% Child-Pugh A) or cTACE (n = 21; 71% Child-Pugh A). The primary outcome was time to progression (TTP), evaluated by intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes included safety, rate of response (based on tumor size and necrosis criteria), and Kaplan-Meier survival time. We performed inverse probability of censoring weighting and competing risk analyses. RESULTS: Patients in the Y90 radioembolization group had significant longer median TTP (>26 mo) than patients in the cTACE group (6.8 mo; P = .0012) (hazard ratio, 0.122; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.027-0.557; P = .007). This was confirmed by competing risk and inverse probability of censoring weighting analyses accounting for transplantation or death. A significantly greater proportion of patients in the cTACE group developed diarrhea (21%) than in the Y90 group (0%; P = .031) or hypoalbuminemia (58% in the cTACE group vs 4% in the Y90 group; P < .001). Similar proportions of patients in each group had a response to therapy, marked by necrosis (74% in the cTACE group vs 87% in the Y90 group) (P = .433). The median survival time, censored to liver transplantation, was 17.7 months for the cTACE group (95% CI, 8.3-not calculable) vs 18.6 months for the Y90 group (95% CI, 7.4-32.5) (P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized phase 2 study of patients with HCC of BCLC stages A or B, we found Y90 radioembolization to provide significantly longer TTP than cTACE. Y90 radioembolization provides better tumor control and could reduce drop-out from transplant waitlists. ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT00956930.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patologia , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolização Terapêutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Radioisótopos de Ítrio/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Quimioembolização Terapêutica/efeitos adversos , Diarreia/etiologia , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Óleo Etiodado/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Hipoalbuminemia/etiologia , Análise de Intenção de Tratamento , Transplante de Fígado , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Necrose , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Radioisótopos de Ítrio/efeitos adversosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To test whether iron oxide (IO)-containing yttrium aluminosilicate (YAS) microparticles (MPs) can generate localized therapeutic hyperthermia (≥ 43°C) when injected intratumorally in an animal model of liver cancer and whether MP distributions could be visualized with magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-one Sprague-Dawley rats implanted with N1-S1 liver tumors were assigned to alternating magnetic field (AMF) exposure following intratumoral injection with IO-YAS MPs (n = 7), sham surgery (n = 7), or baseline iron quantification (n = 7). Three fiberoptic probes allowed spatial and temporal monitoring of temperatures during 24 minutes of AMF exposure. T2-weighted turbo spin-echo MR imaging was performed within 1 hour after the procedure to detect signal voids caused by IO-YAS deposition. Hematoxylin and eosin-stained pathologic slides were also obtained, and the presence of IO-YAS was evaluated with inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy. RESULTS: Following AMF exposure, intratumoral temperatures after IO-YAS MP injection achieved therapeutic hyperthermia whereas those after sham surgery did not (46.6°C ± 1.3 vs 36.8°C ± 0.4; P < .0001). Within the treated group, the normal hepatic parenchyma (NHP) and rectal temperatures were 37.4°C ± 0.9 and 36.5°C ± 1.0 (P = .0809) at the conclusion of AMF exposure, respectively. A T2-weighted signal void at the tumor site was observed in all seven treated animals, and intratumoral IO-YAS was visualized on subsequent histopathologic examination in each case. The mean ratio of tumor:NHP Fe concentrations attributable to IO-YAS MPs was 108:1. CONCLUSIONS: AMF exposure of intratumoral IO-YAS MPs generates localized therapeutic hyperthermia in an animal model of liver cancer. MR detectability and potential for combination brachytherapy warrants further investigation for thermoradiotherapy in liver cancer.