Modified Stoppa approach for operative treatment of acetabular fractures: 10-year experience and mid-term follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: The (modified) Stoppa approach for acetabular fracture surgery has gained significant popularity and early results have been encouraging but clinical outcome at extensive follow-up is scarce. The purpose of this study is to provide an update on our experience with this approach for operative treatment of acetabular fractures and to assess clinical outcome at mid-term follow-up. METHODS: In this retrospective study, all patients treated operatively for an acetabular fracture using the Stoppa approach over a 10-year period were included. Surgery details were reviewed and patients were contacted and requested to return for follow-up. Primary outcome was native hip survivorship, secondary outcome measures included; functional outcome (Merle d'Aubiginé, Harris hip) scores, health-related quality of life (short-form 36) and radiographic outcome (heterotopic ossification, hip osteoarthritis). RESULTS: Forty-five patients received operative fixation for 47 acetabular fractures using the Stoppa approach. Complications requiring surgical intervention were found in one patient (with a vascular lesion) intra-operatively and 3 patients (with wound infections (2) and diffuse bleeding (1)) post-operatively. Follow-up was 83% and 29/39 (74%) native hips survived at mean 59 months (SD 49) postoperatively. Excellent-good functional scores were found in 88% (Merle d'Aubiginé) and 76% (Harris hip) of patients who had retained their native hip. Most (6/8) short-form 36 indices in these patients were comparable to population norms. Of 29 native hips with radiographic follow-up (mean 59 months (SD 49), 4 (86%) had no-minimal radiographic abnormalities. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that the Stoppa approach is a safe and effective technique for acetabular fracture fixation. Moreover, at mid-term follow-up, this approach is associated with satisfactory results in terms of hip survivorship as well as functional and radiographic outcome. As such, our findings reinforce the notion that this less invasive technique presents a valuable alternative to the ilioinguinal approach for the surgical treatment of acetabular fractures.

Determination of Pathogens in Postoperative Wound Infection After Surgically Reduced Calcaneal Fractures and Implications for Prophylaxis and Treatment.

High rates of postoperative wound infection (POWI) have been reported after surgery for calcaneal fractures. This is a retrospective cohort study to determine the causative pathogens of these infections and subsequent treatment strategies. In addition, microbacterial growth from superficial wound swabs and deep fluid or tissue cultures were compared. Patients with a unilateral surgically treated calcaneal fracture during a 15-year period were included. Patient, fracture, and surgical characteristics were collected from the electronic medical records. An infection was categorized as deep or superficial using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Secondary outcomes were wound edge necrosis and wound dehiscence. The collection of culture swabs, their results, and treatment strategies were documented. Of 357 patients, 92 (26%) developed a POWI; 55 (60%) deep and 37 (40%) superficial. The most frequent causative pathogens were Enterobacteriaceae and Staphylococcus aureus. Of the 55 patients with deep infection, 31 (56%) were treated with intravenous antibiotics and surgical debridement, 2 (4%) with intravenous antibiotics, and 22 (40%) with implant removal. In 33 of 92 patients (36%) with a POWI, both superficial and deep cultures were obtained, with a microorganism not cultured from the superficial swab 13 (39%) times. In conclusion, we found that one quarter of patients with operative calcaneal fracture treatment developed a POWI, mainly caused by Enterobacteriaceae or S. aureus. Physicians should not rely on the results of superficially obtained cultures for adequate treatment of deep infection. Because the spectrum of sensitivity profiles varies greatly between hospitals and countries, we recommend empiric antibiotic treatment of both gram-positive and gram-negative microorganisms on suspicion of deep infection.

[Necrotising soft-tissue infections: diagnostics and treatment]. / Necrotiserende wekedeleninfecties: diagnostiek en behandeling.

Necrotising soft-tissue infections occur in the soft tissue compartment consisting of the dermis, subcutaneous tissue, superficial fascia (fascia of Scarpa), deep fascia and muscle. Although this severe and acutely life-threatening infection has a low incidence, both GPs and specialists will see a necrotizing soft-tissue infection more than once during their career. The mortality related to necrotising soft-tissue infections has been halved during the past 15 years from nearly 40 to 20% due to adequate treatment. Laboratory examination and X-ray findings could be of added value, but the gold standard remains biopsy of the fascia and Gram staining. Treatment consists of prompt volume resuscitation in case of sepsis, administration of broad spectrum antibiotics and surgical debridement; this debridement should be as skin-sparing as possible. The use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy has remained a controversial issue, unless a patient has gas gangrene, caused by Clostridium species. A multidisciplinary treatment and admission to a tertiary intensive care unit are indispensable for the treatment of a septic patient with necrotizing soft-tissue infection.