Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Reumatol Clin ; 7(2): 113-23, 2011.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21794794

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Due to the amount and variability in quality regarding the use of biologic therapy (BT) in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), except for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology has promoted the generation of recommendations based on the best evidence available. These recommendations should be a reference for rheumatologists and those involved in the treatment of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), except for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), who are using, or about to use BT. METHODS: Recommendations were developed following a nominal group methodology and based on systematic reviews. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation were classified according to the model proposed by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford. The level of agreement was established through Delphi technique. RESULTS: We have produced recommendations on the use of BT currently available for SpA (but not PsA) in our country. These recommendations include disease assessment, treatment objectives, therapeutic scheme and switching. CONCLUSIONS: We present an update on the SER recommendations for the use of BT in patients with SpA, except for PsA.


Assuntos
Terapia Biológica/normas , Espondilartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inibidores , Adalimumab , Anticorpos Monoclonais/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais/uso terapêutico , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/administração & dosagem , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etanercepte , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/administração & dosagem , Imunoglobulina G/efeitos adversos , Imunoglobulina G/uso terapêutico , Infliximab , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/administração & dosagem , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/uso terapêutico , Espondilartrite/classificação , Sulfassalazina/administração & dosagem , Sulfassalazina/uso terapêutico
2.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 7(2): 113-123, mar.-abr. 2011. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-86110

RESUMO

Objetivo. Dada la gran cantidad de información sobre las terapias biológicas (TB) en las espondiloartritis (EspA), excepto la artritis psoriásica (APs), y la variabilidad en cuanto a su calidad, desde la Sociedad Española de Reumatología (SER) se ha impulsado la generación de recomendaciones basadas en la mejor evidencia posible. Estas deben de servir de referencia para reumatólogos e implicados en el tratamiento de estos pacientes. Métodos. Las recomendaciones se emitieron siguiendo la metodología de grupos nominales. El nivel de evidencia y el grado de recomendación se clasificaron según el modelo del Center for Evidence Based Medicine de Oxford y el grado de acuerdo se extrajo por técnica Delphi. Resultados. Se realizan recomendaciones sobre el uso de las TB para el tratamiento de las EspA (excepto la APs). Incluyen la evaluación de la enfermedad, objetivos del tratamiento, esquema terapéutico y cambios en éste. Conclusiones. Se presentan las actualizaciones a las recomendaciones SER para el uso de TB en pacientes con EsA, excepto la APs(AU)


Objective. Due to the amount and variability in quality regarding the use of biologic therapy (BT) in patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), except for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients, the Spanish Society of Rheumatology has promoted the generation of recommendations based on the best evidence available. These recommendations should be a reference for rheumatologists and those involved in the treatment of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA), except for psoriatic arthritis (PsA), who are using, or about to use BT. Methods. Recommendations were developed following a nominal group methodology and based on systematic reviews. The level of evidence and grade of recommendation were classified according to the model proposed by the Center for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford. The level of agreement was established through Delphi technique. Results. We have produced recommendations on the use of BT currently available for SpA (but not PsA) in our country. These recommendations include disease assessment, treatment objectives, therapeutic scheme and switching. Conclusions. We present an update on the SER recommendations for the use of BT in patients with SpA, except for PsA(AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Conferências de Consenso como Assunto , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Terapia Biológica , Espondilite Anquilosante/terapia , Espondilartrite/terapia , Dor Lombar/epidemiologia , Dor Lombar/etiologia , Terapia Biológica/estatística & dados numéricos , Terapia Biológica/tendências , Espondilite Anquilosante/epidemiologia , Espondilite Anquilosante/prevenção & controle , Espondilite Anquilosante/fisiopatologia , Dor Lombar/terapia
3.
Reumatol. clín. (Barc.) ; 6(supl.1): 47-50, mar. 2010. tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-148868

RESUMO

El manejo de los pacientes con EA que en tratamiento biológico presentan una buena respuesta clínica ha suscitado siempre enorme controversia. Los resultados de los diferentes estudios publicados indican que la retirada del tratamiento no es una buena opción terapéutica en estos pacientes. Actualmente no existe ninguna definición validada de remisión clínica en pacientes con EA. Una hipotética definición debería incluir la ausencia de signos y síntomas de enfermedad en cualquier localización junto con ausencia de progresión de la enfermedad, y todo ello durante el tiempo suficiente para establecer que persiste. En nuestra experiencia, en los pacientes que presentaran una aparente remisión clínica según la definición previamente establecida, podría valorarse la posibilidad de suspender el tratamiento temporalmente, sobre todo si tenemos en cuenta que es seguro y eficaz reintroducirlo (AU)


The management of patients with AS and a good clinical response to biologic therapy is controversial. The results of the different published papers suggest that the suspension of treatment is not a good therapeutic option in these patients. There is currently no validated definition for clinical remission in patients with AS. A hypothetical definition should include the absence of signs and symptoms of disease in any localization, associated to the lack of progression of the disease and all of this during a period of time long enough to establish its persistence with time. In our experience, those patients presenting an apparent clinical remission, based on the previously established definition, could be considered for temporary treatment suspension, especially if we take into account that the reintroduction of treatment is safe and effective (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Terapia Biológica/métodos , Suspensão de Tratamento , Fatores de Risco , Indução de Remissão/métodos , Receptores do Fator de Necrose Tumoral/antagonistas & inibidores
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA