Unveiling prostatic inflammation to optimize management of lower urinary tract symptoms: a discussion with experts.

Benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) and associated lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common conditions in men, which increase in frequency and severity with age, and have a significant impact on quality of life. Chronic prostatic inflammation is increasingly being recognized as a key component of BPO. This may lead to new targets for the management of BPO/LUTS. This podcast is based on presentations from a symposium titled 'Unveiling prostatic inflammation to optimize LUTS management' held at the European Association of Urology 2023 Congress. The presenters outline evidence of a role for prostatic inflammation in the development and progression of BPO/LUTS, approaches to the identification of biomarkers of inflammation, and the implications of prostatic inflammation for the optimal management of BPO/LUTS.

A Systematic Review of Patients' Values, Preferences, and Expectations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

CONTEXT: Understanding men's values and preferences in the context of personal, physical, emotional, relational, and social factors is important in optimising patient counselling, facilitating treatment decision-making, and improving guideline recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the available evidence regarding the values, preferences, and expectations of men towards the investigation and treatment (conservative, pharmacological, and surgical) of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We searched electronic databases until August 31, 2020 for quantitative and qualitative studies that reported values and preferences regarding the investigation and treatment of LUTS in men. We assessed the quality of evidence and risk of bias using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and GRADE Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research (CERQual) approaches. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We included 25 quantitative studies, three qualitative studies, and one mixed-methods study recruiting 9235 patients. Most men reported urodynamic testing to be acceptable, despite discomfort or embarrassment, as it significantly informs treatment decisions (low certainty evidence). Men preferred conservative and less risky treatment options, but the preference varied depending on baseline symptom severity and the risk/benefit characteristics of the treatment (moderate certainty). Men preferred pharmacological treatments with a low risk of erectile dysfunction and those especially improving urgency incontinence (moderate certainty). Other important preference considerations included reducing the risk of acute urinary retention or surgery (moderate certainty). CONCLUSIONS: Men prefer lower-risk management options that have fewer sexual side effects and are primarily effective at improving urgency incontinence and nocturia. Overall, the evidence was rated to be of low to moderate certainty. This review can facilitate the treatment decision-making process and improve the trustworthiness of guideline recommendations. PATIENT SUMMARY: We thoroughly reviewed the evidence addressing men's values and preferences regarding the management of urinary symptoms and found that minimising adverse effects is particularly important. Further research to understand other factors that matter to men is required.

The effect of hexanic extract of Serenoa repens on prostatic inflammation: results from a randomized biopsy study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of hexanic extract of Serenoa repens (HESr) on prostatic inflammation in patients with diagnosed prostatic inflammation. METHODS: Patients with prostatic inflammation histologically confirmed by TRUS prostatic biopsy were randomized either to receive HESr (320 mg/day) or no treatment. A second biopsy was performed 6 months later according to standard clinical practice. Inflammation was assessed by the Irani's score and immunohistochemical staining using the CD3, CD4 and CD8 (for T-leucocytes), CD20 (for B-leucocytes) and CD163 (for macrophages) antibodies. RESULTS: Overall 97 patients were eligible for analysis. In the HESr group the mean inflammation grading and aggressiveness grading score significantly decreased from 1.55 and 1.55 at baseline to 0.79 (p = 0.001) and 0.87 (p = 0.001) at the second biopsy, respectively. In the control group the mean inflammation grading score was 1.44 at first biopsy and 1.23 at the second biopsy. The mean aggressiveness gradings core was 1.09 and 0.89, respectively. No statistical significance was found (p = 0.09 and p = 0.74).The mean decrease in all inflammation scores was statistically higher in the HESr patients compared to controls. The immunohistochemical staining showed a significant change in the expression of the analyzed antibodies for the HESr patients compared to the first biopsy. In the nontreatment group, no significant difference was found at the second biopsy. The change in expression of each antibody in the HESr group was statistical significant compared to control. CONCLUSIONS: HESr seems to reduce prostatic inflammation in terms of histological and immunohistochemical parameters in this specific patients population.

Medical Treatment of Nocturia in Men with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Systematic Review by the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms.

CONTEXT: The treatment of nocturia is a key challenge due to the multi-factorial pathophysiology of the symptom and the disparate outcome measures used in research. OBJECTIVE: To assess and compare available therapy options for nocturia, in terms of symptom severity and quality of life. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Medical databases (Embase, Medline, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central) were searched with no date restriction. Comparative studies were included which studied adult men with nocturia as the primary presentation and lower urinary tract symptoms including nocturia or nocturnal polyuria. Outcomes were symptom severity, quality of life, and harms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 44 articles. Antidiuretic therapy using dose titration was more effective than placebo in relation to nocturnal voiding frequency and duration of undisturbed sleep; baseline serum sodium is a key selection criterion. Screening for hyponatremia (< 130 mmol/l) must be undertaken at baseline, after initiation or dose titration, and during treatment. Medications to treat lower urinary tract dysfunction (α-1 adrenergic antagonists, 5-α reductase inhibitors, phosphodiesterase type 5inhibitor, antimuscarinics, beta-3 agonist, and phytotherapy) were generally not significantly better than placebo in short-term use. Benefits with combination therapies were not consistently observed. Other medications (diuretics, agents to promote sleep, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories) were sometimes associated with response or quality of life improvement. The recommendations of the Guideline Panel are presented. CONCLUSIONS: Issues of trial design make therapy of nocturia a challenging topic. The range of contributory factors relevant in nocturia makes it desirable to identify predictors of response to guide therapy. Consistent responses were reported for titrated antidiuretic therapy. For other therapies, responses were less certain, and potentially of limited clinical benefit. PATIENT SUMMARY: This review provides an overview of the current drug treatments of nocturia, which is the need to wake at night to pass urine. The symptom can be caused by several different medical conditions, and measuring its severity and impact varies in separate research studies. No single treatment deals with the symptom in all contexts, and careful assessment is essential to make suitable treatment selection.

Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: The correlation among metabolic syndrome, lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is well established. In particular, CVD has been proposed as a potential risk factor for both LUTS progression and severity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether LUTS severity can be considered as a significant risk factor of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the male population. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus. The combination of the following keywords was adopted in a free-text strategy: benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) or lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and cardiovascular, cardio, major adverse cardiac events, MACE, heart disease, heart, myocardial infarction, myocardial, infarction, stroke, ischemic events, ischemic, cardiac death, coronary syndrome. We included all cross-sectional and longitudinal trials enrolling men and comparing the prevalence or incidence of MACE in men with moderate to severe LUTS compared with those without LUTS or with mild LUTS. The studies in which only nocturia was evaluated were excluded from the analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Of 477 retrieved articles, 5 trials longitudinally reported the incidence of MACE in patients with moderate to severe LUTS in comparisons to those with mild or no LUTS and 10 studies reported the prevalence of history of MACE at enrollment. All were included in the present meta-analysis. Among cross-sectional studies, 38 218 patients and 2527 MACE were included in the meta-analysis. The mean age of enrolled patients was 62.2±8.0 yr. Presence of moderate to severe LUTS significantly increased the risk of reported history of MACE (p<0.001). Metaregression analyses showed that the risk of MACE was lower in older patients and higher in those with diabetes. The association between LUTS-related MACE and diabetes was confirmed in a multivariate regression model after adjusting for age (adjusted r=0.498; p<0.0001). Longitudinal trials included 25 494 patients and 2291 MACE. The mean age of enrolled patients was 52.5±5.5 yr, and mean follow-up was 86.8±22.1 mo. Presence of moderate to severe LUTS was associated with an increased incidence of MACE compared with the rest of the sample (odds ratio: 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.50; p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Men with moderate to severe LUTS seem to have an increased risk of MACE. A holistic approach in considering the morbidities of aging men should be strongly encouraged and represents an important role for the practicing urologist. PATIENT SUMMARY: We evaluated whether the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms could be considered as a significant risk factor for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in the male population. We demonstrated that men with moderate to severe LUTS have an increased risk of MACE.

Bladder Instillation Therapy With Hyaluronic Acid and Chondroitin Sulfate Improves Symptoms of Postradiation Cystitis: Prospective Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: After radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PCa), several patients reported lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to damage and discontinuation of the glycosaminoglycan layer of the bladder. Instillation of hyaluronic acid and chondroitin sulfate (HA-CS) represents replenishment therapy of the glycosaminoglycan layer. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HA-CS in men with symptomatic cystitis after RT for PCa. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty consecutive men were treated with RT for PCa; 30 of these (37.5%) reported clinically relevant LUTS and associated bother as measured by the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index and Problem Index (ICSI/ICPI) Questionnaire 3 months after RT. Symptomatic patients received instillation therapy with HA-CS weekly for the first month and then at weeks 6, 8, and 12. All patients completed the ICSI/ICPI questionnaire before and after RT and at the end of HA-CS treatment. RESULTS: HA-CS significantly reduced postradiation LUTS (P < .001) and bother (P = .006). Age, Gleason score, and radiation dose were the main determinants of worsening of LUTS after radiation (ICSI score baseline vs. postradiation: P = .047, .043, and .023). In multivariate analysis, only age influenced LUTS worsening after RT (P = .01). Age, radiation dose, and radiation toxicity were related to recovery of LUTS (ICSI score postradiation vs. post-HA-CS P = .041, P = .050, and P = .046). In multivariate analysis, no factor was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: A remarkable worsening of symptoms and bother was observed after RT. HA-CS instillation is a safe treatment and resulted in an improvement of LUTS irrespective of age and clinical features, with full recovery of urinary bother.

EAU guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of non-neurogenic male lower urinary tract symptoms including benign prostatic obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To present a summary of the 2013 version of the European Association of Urology guidelines on the treatment and follow-up of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a literature search in computer databases for relevant articles published between 1966 and 31 October 2012. The Oxford classification system (2001) was used to determine the level of evidence for each article and to assign the grade of recommendation for each treatment modality. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Men with mild symptoms are suitable for watchful waiting. All men with bothersome LUTS should be offered lifestyle advice prior to or concurrent with any treatment. Men with bothersome moderate-to-severe LUTS quickly benefit from α1-blockers. Men with enlarged prostates, especially those >40ml, profit from 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) that slowly reduce LUTS and the probability of urinary retention or the need for surgery. Antimuscarinics might be considered for patients who have predominant bladder storage symptoms. The phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor tadalafil can quickly reduce LUTS to a similar extent as α1-blockers, and it also improves erectile dysfunction. Desmopressin can be used in men with nocturia due to nocturnal polyuria. Treatment with an α1-blocker and 5-ARI (in men with enlarged prostates) or antimuscarinics (with persistent storage symptoms) combines the positive effects of either drug class to achieve greater efficacy. Prostate surgery is indicated in men with absolute indications or drug treatment-resistant LUTS due to benign prostatic obstruction. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is the current standard operation for men with prostates 30-80ml, whereas open surgery or transurethral holmium laser enucleation is appropriate for men with prostates >80ml. Alternatives for monopolar TURP include bipolar TURP and transurethral incision of the prostate (for glands <30ml) and laser treatments. Transurethral microwave therapy and transurethral needle ablation are effective minimally invasive treatments with higher retreatment rates compared with TURP. Prostate stents are an alternative to catheterisation for men unfit for surgery. Ethanol or botulinum toxin injections into the prostate are still experimental. CONCLUSIONS: These symptom-oriented guidelines provide practical guidance for the management of men experiencing LUTS. The full version is available online (www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/12_Male_LUTS.pdf).

Is focal therapy an alternative to active surveillance?

Because of the widespread use of prostate-specific antigen, urologists face an increasing number of patients with small-volume, low-grade prostatic carcinoma seeking the optimal therapeutic approach. Concerns about "overdiagnosis" of prostate cancer (PCa) and consequent overtreatment of clinically insignificant tumors in combination with the significant morbidity that traditional therapies carry have resulted in questioning the need for radical treatments of PCa for selected groups of patients with low-risk PCa. Active surveillance has been introduced as a conservative management option for PCa that closely monitors patients and treats them when progression is identified. Recently, because of technological advances, focal therapy has been introduced to optimize control of low-risk cancers while minimizing the adverse events of whole-gland therapy and the anxiety associated with delayed treatment. The rationales, merits, and limitations of both active surveillance and focal therapy are highlighted in this article.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy and garlic consumption: a lesson to learn.

The first case of a kidney haematoma after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) in a patient with nephrolithiasis who was taking aged garlic extraction is reported. Patient was treated conservatively without the need of any intervention. Urologists should be aware that herbal products including garlic, ginkgo, and ginseng have been associated with potential increased bleeding. The present case emphasises the need to specifically seek out a history of herbal use in presurgical patients. It is suggested that herbal medications should be discontinued up to 15 days prior to urologic surgery or SWL to minimise the risk of complications.

Minimally invasive treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms.

During the past decade, increasing numbers of minimally invasive treatments for managing male lower urinary tract symptoms caused by urinary tract obstruction have been positioned. On one hand, transurethral needle ablation and transurethral microwave thermotherapy bridge the gap between medical management and surgery, while on the other hand, outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate and Greenlight laser equal outcomes following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). With the introduction of the bipolar technology, however, TURP has reinforced its position.

Feasibility of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under assisted local anaesthesia: a prospective study on selected patients with upper urinary tract obstruction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility of performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) under local anaesthesia in selected patients. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with unilateral renal obstruction due to pelvic stones > or =2.0 cm were enrolled in our study. First a percutaneous nephrostomy to decompress the obstructed kidney was performed using local anaesthesia (lignocaine). A 16-Fr nephrostomy tube was left in place for 1 wk, and then the second stage was carried out. After having infiltrated the tract and the renal parenchyma with lignocaine, dilatation of the nephrostomy tract was performed. Subsequently, PCNL was done using a 24-Fr rigid nephroscope and a ballistic lithotripter. All patients were premedicated with pethidine HCl intramuscularly 30 min before the beginning of both stages. Diazepam was given (0.1mg/kg orally) to patients before the second stage. Pain scores were collected using 10-cm linear visual analogue scale (VAS) after the completion of both procedures. RESULTS: The procedure was well tolerated. One patient needed further treatment with midazolam during PCNL. The mean VAS score was 38 mm (range: 17-60 mm) for the first stage and 36 mm (13-69 mm) for the second stage. The mean operative time, including both stages, was 127 min (85-155 min). No anaesthesia-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that PCNL under assisted local anaesthesia is safe and effective in selected patients.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: from evidence-based medicine to clinical practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to provide new clinical data on transurethral microwave thermotherapy, evaluate it in the perspective of evidence-based guidelines and daily practice and investigate the driving forces that determine the current position of thermotherapy for the management of benign prostatic obstruction. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have provided significant evidence regarding the efficacy, safety and durability of thermotherapy. Updated evidence-based clinical guidelines on the management of patients with benign prostatic obstruction have been made available. Surveys have evaluated the acceptance of transurethral microwave thermotherapy from the urological community. In addition, several studies have made major contributions to our knowledge of the translation of evidence to daily practice. SUMMARY: The range of therapeutic options for benign prostatic obstruction continues to widen creating the need for clarity in selection and application of these treatments. High-quality data on transurethral microwave thermotherapy have been published and integrated into clinical guidelines. Considerations on the implementation of guidelines to clinical practice, emergence of new treatments, shift of benign prostatic obstruction therapy, economics and the increasing need to treat patients with different clinical profile during the last decade seem to affect the position of transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the armamentarium of a urological centre. Into this frame, transurethral microwave thermotherapy tailored to selective cases seems to remain an attractive option.

Seeking evidence that cell kill guided thermotherapy gives results not inferior to those of transurethral prostate resection: results of a pooled analysis of 3 studies of feedback transurethral microwave thermotherapy.

PURPOSE: We compared ProstaLund Feedback Treatment (PLFT) to transurethral prostate resection (TURP) in terms of efficacy and safety in a pooled analysis of 3 clinical studies with 1-year followup. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Overall raw data on 183 patients with PLFT and 65 with TURP were pooled. All studies had identical inclusion criteria, and the efficacy and safety of the method were evaluated using the International Prostate Symptom Score, maximum urine flow (Qmax), responder rate, bother score, prostate volume reduction and adverse events. RESULTS: The response rate was 85.3% and 85.9% in the PLFT and TURP groups, respectively. One-sided 95% CI analysis showed the noninferiority of PLFT vs TURP for this variable. Mean International Prostate Symptom Score was significantly decreased in the PLFT and TURP groups after 12 months (from 20.9 to 6.4 and 20.7 to 7.1, respectively). The 1-sided upper 95% CI of PLFT was within the noninferiority definition compared with that of TURP. The bother score decrease in the PLFT and TURP groups was not significant different (70.9% and 64.0%, respectively). An increase in Qmax from 7.7 to 16.1 ml per second 12 months after PLFT was noted, while the improvement in Qmax in the TURP group was higher (from 7.5 to 18.6 ml per second). The 1-sided lower 95% CI was close (0.76) but it did not attain the predetermined level of noninferiority (0.80). Mean transurethral ultrasound determined volume 12 months after PLFT and TURP was reduced by 32.8% and 58.1%, respectively. A significant correlation between the transurethral ultrasound determined prostate volume reduction and estimated cell kill was found (r = 0.456, p <0.000001). Serious adverse events with causality occurred in 15.4% of patients with TURP compared with 6.0% in those with PLFT (p = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Combined experience from our pooled analysis indicates that PLFT challenges TURP in terms of efficacy and safety after 1 year of followup.

Application of external microwave thermotherapy in urology: past, present, and future.

The excellent clinical results of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) gave to TUMT the leading position among the microwave thermotherapy modalities available for the treatment of different urologic conditions. Research in TUMT has focused on operating software, temperature monitoring, intraprostatic heat distribution, cell-kill calculations, and correlations with clinical variables. Randomized comparisons of TUMT with other established therapies for BPH, including transurethral resection, have facilitated the evaluation of the clinical outcome, durability, morbidity, and costs of the treatment. The applications of microwave thermotherapy in other urologic diseases are also presented in this review.

Efficacy and safety of intraprostatic temperature-controlled microwave thermotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a prospective, open-label, single-center study with 1-year follow-up.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Different devices for transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) are currently available for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Prostalund Feedback Treatment (PLFT), which continuously records the intraprostatic temperature, and its impact on sexual function of the patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 41 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to BPH were entered in this prospective open-label, single-center study of PLFT. The initial evaluation was performed according to a standard protocol. At 3, 6, and 12 months, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), bother score, sexual function, and peak flow rate (Qmax) were recorded. In addition, determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) and measurement of residual urine volume were repeated at the 6- and 12-month visits. All adverse events were also recorded. Patients with IPSS of < or =7, > or =50% improvement in IPSS from baseline, a Qmax of > or =15 mL/sec, or > or =50% improvement in Qmax from baseline were judged responders to the treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-three of the patients completed the 12-month visit. The response rate was 88% (29 of 33 patients). There was a statistically significant decrease in IPSS at the 12-month visit, the mean IPSS being 7.1 v 21.9 at baseline (P<0.001). The mean IPSS was 10.3 and 7.6 at the 3- and 6-months' follow-up, respectively. The bother score presented a similar improvement, with a decrease from a mean of 4.2 at baseline to a mean of 1.4 after 12 months (P<0.001). The mean Qmax improved from 8.4 mL/sec at baseline to 15.9 mL/sec, 19.2 mL/sec, and 17.8 mL/sec at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively (P<0.001). The mean change in prostate volume, as determined by TRUS, was 16 mL at 6 months and 19 mL at 12 months (P<0.001). The procedure was well tolerated. The mean post-treatment catheterization time was 17.90 days. Bladder spasms and urinary tract infection were the most common adverse events. Coitus ability remained practically unchanged after treatment (from 71% to 74.3%), but the number of patients with ejaculation decreased (from 78% to 51.4%). CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that PLFT is an effective and safe treatment for most patients with BPH.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: the gold standard for minimally invasive therapies for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia?

From all available minimally invasive methods for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) has gained a firm position as the most attractive option. Recent research has produced innovations in high-energy TUMT, including new treatment protocols, refined selection criteria, and monitoring of intraprostatic temperature. Furthermore, long-term results from randomized studies comparing TUMT with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or medical treatment are now available. All these data indicate that more durable clinical outcomes and less morbidity can be achieved with TUMT, strengthening its position as a standard treatment for BPH. This paper describes the status of TUMT in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to BPH, focusing on variations in the outcomes with different devices, the durability of treatment outcomes, morbidity, selection criteria, and cost. The relation of TUMT to medical management and TURP also is addressed.

Thermotherapy and thermoablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: From all the available thermoablative methods for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, transurethral microwave thermotherapy is considered as standard in minimally invasive management. The literature is enriched by several new studies on transurethral microwave thermotherapy, and thus this review presents up-to-date information about thermotherapy. RECENT FINDINGS: New studies have provided significant information regarding differences in outcome for devices with different protocols and selection criteria, confirming the superiority of high-energy programmes. Furthermore, monitoring of the intraprostatic temperature promises better clinical results by means of individualization of the treatment. Long-term results have been available and allow the evaluation of the fundamental issue of treatment durability. Improvement after high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy remains durable for more than 2.5 years. Randomized studies comparing this treatment with other established therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia, including medical treatment and transurethral resection of the prostate, have also contributed to an evaluation of the morbidity, and costs of treatment. Clinical outcomes with transurethral microwave thermotherapy are in the range of those obtained with transurethral resection of the prostate and are superior to those of medical management. Retreatment after transurethral resection of the prostate emerges because of complications following the procedure, whereas retreatment after transurethral microwave thermotherapy is as a result of treatment failure. In addition, the rate of failure of medical management is almost seven times higher than that for transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Thus, the latter seems to play a dominant role in the economic models used to assess the cost-efficiency of different treatment modalities for benign prostatic hyperplasia. SUMMARY: The recent innovations in high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy provide better and more durable clinical outcomes and lower morbidity, and strengthen its position as an established treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, there is always room for improvement, so further research on therapeutic protocols, treatment monitoring and selection criteria are to be welcomed.