Structural distress screening and supportive care for patients with lung cancer on systemic therapy: A randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Gaining regular insight into the nature and severity of distress by a psychosocial nurse coupled with referral to psychosocial and/or paramedical healthcare provider(s) is an experimental supportive care approach. We sought to examine the effects of this approach on quality of life (QoL), patient's mood and satisfaction, end-of-life care and survival in patients with lung cancer. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent lung cancer starting systemic therapy were randomly assigned to receive usual care or the experimental approach. Patients were followed up at 1, 7, 13 and 25 weeks after randomisation with the EORTC-QLQ-C30, the European Quality of Life-5D, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire-III. Primary outcome was the mean change in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 global QoL-score between 1 and 25 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 223 patients were randomised of whom 111 (50%) completed all four assessments (44% in the usual care group versus 55% in the experimental group). No significant difference was found in the mean change global QoL-score (-2.4, 95% CI: 12.1-7.2; P = 0.61), nor in the other patient-reported outcomes. Fewer patients in the experimental group received chemotherapy shortly before the end-of-life, and median survival was comparable (10.3 versus 10.1 months, P = 0.62). Of the 112 dropouts, 33 died and 79 discontinued participation for other reasons. CONCLUSIONS: This supportive care approach neither improved QoL nor other patient-reported outcomes in patients with lung cancer. However, it reduced the use of chemotherapy shortly before the end of life. Possibly, (late) side effects of systemic therapy may have obscured effects of our intervention on QoL. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NTR3540.

VeriStrat(®) has prognostic value in advanced stage NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib and sorafenib.

BACKGROUND: The serum proteomic test VeriStrat has been shown to be able to classify advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for overall survival (OS) after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). In this study, VeriStrat was evaluated as a pre-treatment stratification tool in patients with advanced stage NSCLC for treatment with the combination of erlotinib and sorafenib, considering both OS and progression-free survival (PFS) as end points. METHODS: Serum samples from 50 patients treated within the context of a phase II trial of first-line erlotinib and sorafenib were analysed with VeriStrat, a fully locked mass spectrometry-based test that identifies patients likely to have good or poor outcome on EGFR therapy based on eight distinct features in mass spectra. Analysis was performed fully blinded to all clinical data, and then the outcome data were analysed with respect to the obtained serum classifications. RESULTS: VeriStrat classified pre-treatment samples into two groups, VeriStrat Good and VeriStrat Poor, which were significantly different in OS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.30, log-rank P=0.009) and in PFS (HR 0.40, log-rank P=0.035). CONCLUSION: VeriStrat has shown its potential for stratification of unselected, advanced stage NSCLC patients treated in first line with a combination of erlotinib and sorafenib.

Fever and neutropenia in cancer patients: the diagnostic role of cytokines in risk assessment strategies.

Cancer patients treated with chemotherapy are susceptible to bacterial infections. Therefore, all neutropenic cancer patients with fever receive standard therapy consisting of broad-spectrum antibiotics and hospitalization. However, febrile neutropenia in cancer patients is often due to other causes than bacterial infections. Therefore, standard therapy should be re-evaluated and new treatment strategies for patients with variable risk for bacterial infection should be considered. This paper reviews the changing spectrum of microorganisms and resistance of microorganisms to antibiotics in infection during neutropenia and discusses new strategies for the selection of patients with low-risk for bacterial infection using clinical and biochemical parameters such as acute phase proteins and cytokines. These low-risk patients may be treated with alternative therapies such as oral antibiotics, early discharge from the hospital or outpatient treatment.