Malnutrition and Perioperative Nutritional Support in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Patients: Results from a Prospective Study.

INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPSs) are mesenchymal neoplasms. The prevalence of protein energetic malnutrition (PEM) and its impact in RPS patients who were candidates for surgery is unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective feasibility study enrolled 35 patients with primary RPS who were candidates for extended multivisceral resection. PEM was screened at enrollment. Preoperative high protein ß-hydroxy-ß-methyl butyrate oral nutritional support (ONS) was provided according to the degree of PEM. After surgery, nutritional support followed standard practice, targeting at least 1 g/kg/day protein and 20 kcal/kg/day caloric intake within the third postoperative day (POD). PEM was re-evaluated before surgery on POD 10, and at 4 and 12 months after surgery. Primary outcomes were the patient's compliance to preoperative ONS and the physician's compliance to postoperative nutritional targets. RESULTS: PEM was documented in 46% of patients at baseline; ONS met a 91% adherence (overall well tolerated). After ONS, PEM reduced to 38% (p = 0.45). The postoperative caloric target was reached on day 4.1 (standard error ± 2.7), with a protocol adherence rate of 52%. On POD 10, 91% of patients experienced PEM, the worsening of which was greater after resection of four or more organs (p = 0.06). At 4 and 12 months after surgery, almost all patients had fully recovered. A significant correlation between PEM at surgery and postoperative complications was found (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Relevant PEM prevalence in RPS is documented for the first time. PEM correlates with greater morbidity. In this setting, preoperative ONS was feasible and well-tolerated. Disease-related factors for PEM and the ideal perioperative caloric target in the context of extended multivisceral resection need to be further investigated. Nutritional support should be included in enhanced recovery after surgery programs for RPS. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03877588.

Role of Chemotherapy, VEGFR Inhibitors, and mTOR Inhibitors in Advanced Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Tumors (PEComas).

PURPOSE: Perivascular epitheliod cell tumors (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms for which the role of systemic treatments is not established as there are no published prospective clinical trials or sufficiently large retrospective case series. The aim of this study is to clarify the activity of conventional chemotherapy and biological agents in advanced/metastatic PEComas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: This was an observational, retrospective, international study that included patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa treated with systemic therapy at 5 European sarcoma reference centers and within the Italian Rare Cancer Network. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox hazards regression models. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were included. Cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens were active only in a small proportion of PEComas. Gemcitabine-based regimens [objective response rate (ORR): 20%, median progression-free survival (PFS): 3.4 months] seemed to have the same activity of anthracycline-based regimens (ORR: 13%, median PFS: 3.2 months). Antiangiogenic agents resulted in disease stabilization in some patients, with a number having density changes/tissue response on imaging, with an ORR of 8.3% and a median PFS of 5.4 months. mTOR inhibitors were the most active agents, with an ORR of 41% and a median PFS of 9 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides data for the selection of systemic therapy in patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa: mTOR inhibitors are the most active agents. Antiangiogenics and chemotherapy with gemcitabine-based regimens or anthracycline-based regimens are options in further line, but with a lower response rate and PFS.

Outcomes of Elderly Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treated with First-Line Chemotherapy: A Pooled Analysis of 12 EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Trials.

BACKGROUND: Almost half of patients diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) are older than 65 years; however, the outcomes of elderly patients with metastatic disease are not well described. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An elderly cohort of patients aged ≥65 years was extracted from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group database of patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for advanced STS within 12 EORTC clinical trials. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and response rate (RR). RESULTS: Of 2,810 participants in EORTC trials, there were 348 elderly patients (12.4%, median 68 years; interquartile range [IQR], 67-70; maximum 84 years) and 2,462 patients aged <65 years (median 49 years; IQR, 39-57). Most elderly patients had a performance status of 0 (n = 134; 39%) or 1 (n = 177; 51%). Leiomyosarcoma (n = 130; 37%) was the most common histological subtype. Lung metastases were present in 181 patients (52%) and liver metastases in 63 patients (18%). Overall, 126 patients (36%) received doxorubicin, 114 patients (33%) doxorubicin + ifosfamide, 43 patients (12%) epirubicin, 39 patients (11%) trabectedin, and 26 patients (7%) ifosfamide. Overall RR was 14.9% (n = 52), median PFS was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.7-4.3), and median OS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 9.43-11.83). In patients aged <65 years, overall RR was 20.3% (n = 501), median OS was 12.3 months (95% CI, 11.9-12.9), and median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.9-4.6). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with metastatic STS treated with first-line chemotherapy were largely underrepresented in these EORTC STS trials. Their outcomes were only slightly worse than those of younger patients. Novel trials with broader eligibility criteria are needed for elderly patients. These trials should incorporate geriatric assessments and measurements of age-adjusted health-related quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This analysis demonstrates that elderly patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma are underrepresented in clinical trials of first-line chemotherapy by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group. Furthermore, the elderly participants were generally of excellent performance status, which is not representative of an unselected elderly population. These data provide rationale for development of novel trials for elderly patients that are not only for "elite" patients but include comprehensive geriatric assessments for risk stratification. Because chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcomas is largely given with palliative intent, incorporation of health-related quality of life measures with traditional endpoints will provide a more holistic approach to future clinical trials.

Effect of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Regional Hyperthermia on Long-term Outcomes Among Patients With Localized High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma: The EORTC 62961-ESHO 95 Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with soft tissue sarcoma are at risk for local recurrence and distant metastases despite optimal local treatment. Preoperative anthracycline plus ifosfamide chemotherapy improves outcome in common histological subtypes. OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether the previously reported improvement in local progression-free survival by adding regional hyperthermia to neoadjuvant chemotherapy translates into improved survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Open-label, phase 3 randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxic effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus regional hyperthermia. Adult patients (age ≥18 years) with localized soft tissue sarcoma (tumor ≥5 cm, French Federation Nationale des Centers de Lutte Contre le Cancer [FNCLCC] grade 2 or 3, deep) were accrued across 9 centers (6, Germany; 1, Norway; 1, Austria; 1, United States) from July 1997 to November 2006. Follow-up ended December 2014. INTERVENTIONS: After stratification for tumor presentation and site, patients were randomly assigned to either neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of doxorubicin, ifosfamide, and etoposide alone, or combined with regional hyperthermia. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was local progression-free survival. Secondary end points included treatment safety and survival, with survival defined from date of randomization to death due to disease or treatment. Patients lost to follow-up were censored at the date of their last follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 341 patients were randomized, and 329 (median [range] age, 51 [18-70] years; 147 women, 182 men) were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. By December 2014, 220 patients (67%; 95% CI, 62%-72%) had experienced disease relapse, and 188 (57%; 95% CI, 52%-62%) had died. Median follow-up was 11.3 years. Compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, adding regional hyperthermia improved local progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.86; P = .002). Patients randomized to chemotherapy plus hyperthermia had prolonged survival rates compared with those randomized to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54-0.98; P = .04) with 5-year survival of 62.7% (95% CI, 55.2%-70.1%) vs 51.3% (95% CI, 43.7%-59.0%), respectively, and 10-year survival of 52.6% (95% CI, 44.7%-60.6%) vs 42.7% (95% CI, 35.0%-50.4%). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma the addition of regional hyperthermia to neoadjuvant chemotherapy resulted in increased survival, as well as local progression-free survival. For patients who are candidates for neoadjuvant treatment, adding regional hyperthermia may be warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003052.

Time to Definitive Failure to the First Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor in Localized GI Stromal Tumors Treated With Imatinib As an Adjuvant: A European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group Intergroup Randomized Trial in Collaboration With the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group, UNICANCER, French Sarcoma Group, Italian Sarcoma Group, and Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas.

PURPOSE: In 2004, we started an intergroup randomized trial of adjuvant imatinib versus no further therapy after R0-R1 surgery patients with localized, high- or intermediate-risk GI stromal tumor (GIST). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 2 years of imatinib 400 mg daily or no further therapy after surgery. The primary end point was overall survival; relapse-free survival (RFS), relapse-free interval, and toxicity were secondary end points. In 2009, given the concurrent improvement in prognosis of patients with advanced GIST, we changed the primary end point to imatinib failure-free survival (IFFS), with agreement of the independent data monitoring committee. We report on a planned interim analysis. RESULTS: A total of 908 patients were randomly assigned between December 2004 and October 2008: 454 to imatinib and 454 to observation. Of these, 835 patients were eligible. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years, 5-year IFFS was 87% in the imatinib arm versus 84% in the control arm (hazard ratio, 0.79; 98.5% CI, 0.50 to 1.25; P = .21); RFS was 84% versus 66% at 3 years and 69% versus 63% at 5 years (log-rank P < .001); and 5-year overall survival was 100% versus 99%, respectively. Among 528 patients with high-risk GIST by local pathologist, 5-year IFFS was 79% versus 73%; among 336 centrally reviewed high-risk patients, it was 77% versus 73%, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study confirms that adjuvant imatinib has an overt impact on RFS. No significant difference in IFFS was observed, although in the high-risk subgroup there was a trend in favor of the adjuvant arm. IFFS was conceived as a potential end point in the adjuvant setting because it is sensitive to secondary resistance, which is the main adverse prognostic factor in patients with advanced GIST.

The role of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and isolated perfusion (ILP) interventions in sarcoma.

Locally advanced sarcomas in the extremity and in the retroperitoneum/abdominal cavity (peritoneal sarcomatosis, PS) can be managed administering chemotherapy locally using isolated limb perfusion (ILP) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), respectively. In this review, the authors discuss the pros and cons of the use of these locoregional therapies in locally advanced soft tissue sarcoma, with a view to establishing their role in the multidisciplinary approach to these difficult diseases.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: evolving role of the multidisciplinary team approach in management.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare tumors of the GI tract arising from mesenchymal cells. Treatment options include surgical resection and medical therapy with imatinib. A summary of National Comprehensive Cancer Network and European Society of Medical Oncology clinical practice guidelines relating to GIST management are presented here. A multidisciplinary team of physicians is essential to the successful treatment of GIST. Evidence supports multidisciplinary team management with a gastroenterologist, surgeon, medical oncologist, pathologist and radiologist. Consultations between them are recommended to ensure optimal care of patients with GIST. The role for individual core team workers is highlighted. The benefits of multidisciplinary disease management of patients include reducing recurrent disease, optimizing timing of surgery and organ preservation, prolonging survival for the patient and enhancing response to targeted therapies.

Natural history of imatinib-naive GISTs: a retrospective analysis of 929 cases with long-term follow-up and development of a survival nomogram based on mitotic index and size as continuous variables.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) natural history per se has not been extensively investigated yet, with most data being drawn from large studies with a relevant referral bias. Hence, the estimation of prognosis still remains a critical issue. We retrospectively evaluated 929 GISTs resected between 1980 and 2000 in 35 Italian institutions. A total of 526 patients were found to be suitable for refining risk assessment through the development of a survival nomogram. Median follow-up was 126 months. On testing for potential prognostic parameters, age, tumor site, size, and mitotic index proved to be predictors of OS on both univariable and multivariable Cox model analyses, whereas necrosis and cytonuclear atypia were significant on univariable analysis only. The discriminative ability of the model, including the parameters selected after a backward procedure (C=0.72), improved compared with the National Institutes of Health 2002 (C=0.64) and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2007 (C=0.63). On the basis of these data we developed a prognostic nomogram for survival that considers site, size, and mitotic index as continuous variables, providing estimates stratified for patients aged ≤65 and >65 years. This nomogram is a tool based on survival. It overcomes problems that result from artificial categorization of continuous variables. We believe that in the future this should also be attempted by nomograms based on the risk of relapse.

Peritoneal sarcomatosis: is there a subset of patients who may benefit from cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND: Unlike novel molecular-targeted therapies for metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), conventional treatments for peritoneal sarcomatosis (PS) are mostly ineffective. As with carcinomatosis of epithelial origin, a rationale base supports an aggressive locoregional treatment of PS, but the use of CRS and HIPEC in this setting is still controversial. We assessed the outcome of clinically and pathologically homogeneous subsets of patients with PS uniformly treated by cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). METHODS: A prospective database of 37 patients who underwent CRS and close-abdomen HIPEC with cisplatin and doxorubicin or mitomycin-C was reviewed. PS originated from GIST (pre-imatinib era) in 8 patients, uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULS) in 11, retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLP) in 13, and other sarcoma in 5. RESULTS: CRS was macroscopically complete in 28 patients (75.7%). Operative mortality was 3.7% and morbidity 21.6%. After median follow-up of 104 (range, 1-131) months, peritoneal disease progression occurred in 16 patients, distant metastases in 5, and both in 13. For all patients, median overall survival was 26.2 months; 7 patients were alive at 46-130 months (ULS, n = 4; RPLP, n = 2; GIST, n = 1). RPLP had the best overall survival (median, 34 months) but 100% peritoneal relapse; GIST had dismal overall, local-regional-free and distant-free survival; ULS had the higher proportion of long survivors and best local-regional-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, results of CRS and HIPEC did not compare favorably to those of conventional therapy. In a subgroup analysis, the combined approach did not change GIST and RPLS natural history. The interesting results with ULS may warrant further investigations.

Hyperthermia as an adjunctive treatment for soft-tissue sarcoma.

The treatment for high-risk soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) in adults remains a challenge for the multidisciplinary approach. Despite aggressive local treatment, high-risk STSs have a tendency for hematogenous spread, which is related, for each histologically distinct sarcoma, to risk factors, such as pathologic grade, size and location. The multimodality approach focuses on the combination of radiochemotherapy in a neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting, surgery being considered the mainstay of local treatment. Therefore, current clinical research aims include preoperative treatment to control systemic microscopic disease and to downsize the primary tumor mass. Within the past 20 years, the application of hyperthermia has been integrated in multimodal treatment strategies in several forms of advanced malignant tumors, as well as in STSs. Hyperthermia is of clinical interest in the temperature range of 40-43 degrees C. Higher temperatures of 44-46 degrees C are not clinically realistic. The rationale for the combination of cytotoxic drugs with regional hyperthermia in the treatment of STS is based upon experimental and clinical evidence that heat increases the killing of tumor cells by direct thermal toxicity and enhances the efficacy of some drugs, such as alkylating agents and platinum analogs. Moreover, recent results show that hyperthermia may be able to modulate the immune system by inducing the expression of heat-shock proteins. The approach of multimodality treatment in STS has used regional hyperthermia with systemic chemotherapy within a preoperative and postoperative strategy. The synergistic effect of hyperthermia with chemotherapy is also used in locoregional treatments, such as isolated limb perfusion and intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy after cytoreductive surgery for the treatment of abdominal sarcomatosis: clinical outcome and prognostic factors in 60 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal sarcomatosis is a rare nosologic entity with a poor prognosis. After a Phase I study on cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal intraoperative chemotherapy (HIIC), the authors reported the results of the treatment of 60 patients using this novel multimodal approach. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients had multifocal primary disease and 31 patients had recurrent abdominal sarcoma. Tumor histology was represented by visceral (n = 26 [43%]) and retroperitoneal (n = 34 [57%]) sarcoma. All patients underwent cytoreductive surgery (with no or minimal residual disease) and 90-minute HIIC with doxorubicin (15.25 mg/L of perfusate) and cisplatin (43 mg/L). The clinical outcome and the prognostic value of 11 clinicopathologic variables were analyzed. RESULTS: No postoperative deaths occurred. The morbidity rate was 33% and the moderate to severe locoregional toxicity rate was 15%. The median time to local disease progression and the median overall survival were 22 months and 34 months, respectively. Using multivariate analysis, histologic grading and completeness of surgical cytoreduction predicted patient prognosis, indicating that both local progression-free and overall survival were affected significantly by tumor aggressiveness and local disease control. CONCLUSIONS: Although these results were encouraging, there was no definitive conclusion reached regarding the therapeutic activity of this locoregional treatment. In addition, the toxicity rate was substantial. In the absence of effective systemic agents, the therapeutic potential of cytoreductive surgery plus HIIC should be explored further in comparative trials.

Feasibility of peritonectomy associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion in patients with Pseudomyxoma peritonei.

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei is a rare disease characterized by a complete redistribution of mucin within the peritoneal cavity. It can be classified into three histologic groups: disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis, peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis, and an intermediate group. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of cytoreductive surgery requiring peritonectomy procedures associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion, a technique that combines hyperthermia and high drug doses administered locally. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (19 males and 8 females) were enrolled in a phase II clinical trial. Twenty-two cases underwent cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion, and 6 received debulking surgery only. One patient was operated on twice for disease recurrence. All patients with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis presented serous ascites, whereas all but one patient with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis or in the intermediate group presented mucinous ascites. Cytoreductive surgery was performed with peritonectomy procedures. The closed abdomen technique was adopted for intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion using a preheated polysaline perfusate containing cisplatin (25 mg/m2/L) plus mitomycin-C (3.3 mg/m2/L) through a heart-lung pump at a mean flow of 600 mL/min for 60 mins from the hyperthermic phase (42.5 degrees C). RESULTS: All but one of the patients with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and 2 of the 3 patients in the intermediate group were optimally cytoreduced. Patients with serous ascites (all patients with peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis and 1 patient with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis) were considered ineligible for treatment because of tumor diffusion. The morbidity rate was 22%. There was one case of treatment-related mortality 30 days after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The following conclusions can be drawn from this phase II clinical trial: 1) patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei originating from undifferentiated mucinous adenocarcinoma (peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis), with complete distribution into the peritoneal cavity, are not eligible for the cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion technique; 2) the presence of serous ascites would seem to exclude patients from the treatment; 3) cytoreductive surgery associated with intraperitoneal hyperthermic perfusion is the most suitable approach for patients with disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and in the intermediate group.