Update on dermatologic laser therapy II - advances in photodynamic therapy using laser-assisted drug delivery.

Technical advances in recent years have led to the development of new dermatologic laser systems, light sources, and treatment concepts. With the introduction of ablative fractional lasers (using common wavelengths) in the field of dermatology, it is now possible to more effectively and efficiently treat a variety of skin disorders. One important example of these advances is laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD). A type of LADD, laser-assisted photodynamic therapy has been successfully employed in the treatment of non-melanoma skin cancer including field cancerization. This treatment concept has been continually modified and today includes the use of daylight as well as artificial daylight systems. This update is based as cited, shortened and updated according to "Paasch,U. 2019. Laser-assistierte photodynamische Therapie. p. 226-239. In G.Kautz (ed.) Energie für die Haut. Springer Nature, Springer Nature".

New lasers and light sources - old and new risks?

Recent developments (new wavelengths, treatment concepts, and combinations) in the field of lasers, intense pulsed light (IPL), LED, as well as new energy and light sources have opened up new therapeutic options that extend beyond mere aesthetic indications. Thus, while fractional lasers used to be employed to merely treat wrinkles, the same devices - in the context of laser-assisted drug delivery - have now become important tools in the treatment of scars, field cancerization, and epithelial tumors. The requirements posed to physicians, both with respect to establishing the indication and conducting treatment, have been growing along with the increase in technological complexity as well as the rising number of comorbidities and comedications in a patient population that continues to age. At the same time, home-use devices have been introduced for a variety of indications. These devices are characterized by low power and special safety features aimed at preventing accidents, risks, and side effects. Despite the reduced efficacy of such self-treatment devices, there is an increased risk of misuse, given that the basic prerequisite for adequate treatment cannot be ensured, to wit, the exact diagnosis and therapeutic indication. Consequently, during hair removal or anti-wrinkle treatment, pigmented lesions and cutaneous neoplasms may be altered, thus giving rise to expected, unexpected and new side effects and complications. In the aforementioned setting, it is important that all potential users of these new technologies be properly trained in a manner that ensures those treated a maximum of safety and efficacy in accordance with the guiding principle "diagnosis certa - ullae therapiae fundamentum".

Fractional CO2 laser is as effective as Q-switched ruby laser for the initial treatment of a traumatic tattoo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Q-switched laser treatments are considered the standard method for removing both regular and traumatic tattoos. Recently, the removal of tattoo ink using ablative fractional lasers has been reported. Ablative fractional CO2 laser and q-switched ruby laser treatments were used in a split-face mode to compare the safety and efficacy of the two types of laser in removing a traumatic tattoo caused by the explosion of a firework. STUDY DESIGN/PATIENTS AND METHODS: A male patient suffering from a traumatic tattoo due to explosive deposits in his entire face was subjected to therapy. A series of eleven treatments were performed. The right side of the face was always treated using an ablative fractional CO2 laser, whereas the left side was treated only using a q-switched ruby laser. RESULTS: After a series of eleven treatments, the patient demonstrated a significant lightening on both sides of his traumatic tattoo, with no clinical difference. After the first six treatments, the patient displayed greater lightening on the right side of his face, whereas after another five treatments, the left side of the patient's face appeared lighter. No side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In the initial stage of removing the traumatic tattoo, the ablative fractional laser treatment appeared to be as effective as the standard ruby laser therapy. However, from the 6th treatment onward, the ruby laser therapy was more effective. Although ablative fractional CO2 lasers have the potential to remove traumatic tattoos, they remain a second-line treatment option.

Update dermatologic laser therapy.

New trends in dermatological laser therapy during the last years are based on new wavelengths, concepts and treatment combinations resulting in a variety of new dermatologic indications. Fractional laser therapy of chronic actinic damage of the skin has been introduced and already represents a standard technique. The concept of fractional non-ablative and ablative laser treatment has been shown to be safe and effective. Also pigmented and vascular skin changes can be treated by this method. New, very promising concepts for laser epilation include linear scanned as well as low fluence laser systems. The first enable very short treatment times for large areas; the latter are the basis for the growing market of laser epilation devices for home use. Nevertheless, the potential of low fluence laser devices for long-term hair reduction has not been tested so far. Furthermore, no data exist on side effects resulting from repetitive application of laser light to melanocytic lesions. Laser lipolysis has been introduced as the latest, minimally invasive way of removing small localised fat deposits. The new procedure may have a great potential for liposculpture; its further development should be thoughtfully observed. The latest innovations for precise ablation are ultra-short pulsed laser systems. Femtosecond lasers avoid thermal damage at the border areas of ablation zones.

Fractional laser skin therapy.

Modern treatment of chronically photodamaged skin provides new, minimally invasive methods for laser intervention, using fractional, non-ablative thermal energy for an induction of dermal remodeling. The clinical efficacy coupled with a minimum "down time" for the patient has directed the development of fractional ablative laser systems. Recently introduced systems are based on CO(2) and heated Er:YAG laser systems. The clinical efficacy has been tested on one prototype each and verified their effects at a microscopic level. Initial reports suggest the results are comparable to those achieved with fractional ablative systems. We review the current possibilities incorporating our personal experience. Systematic investigations of clinical outcomes with various system settings are still needed. The possible combination of ablative and non-ablative fractional technology may also lead to increased efficacy and safety of the procedure.