Combination effects of herbal and western medicines on osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: This study aimed to comprehensively review the effect of combining herbal medicine (HM) with Western Medicine (WM) compared to WM alone on bone mineral density (BMD) improvement for osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched using 10 databases, including PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Nation Information by NII. We selected studies that used BMD as an evaluation index and administered HM treatment for osteoporosis in patients with RA. Subsequently, a meta-analysis was conducted using BMD as a continuous variable using RevMan version 5.4. Results: Eighteen RCTs that met the eligibility criteria of this study were selected. The total number of study participants was 1,491 (481 men and 1,010 women). The mean age of participants was 52.4 ± 7.4 years, and the mean morbidity period of RA was 6.8 ± 1.3 years. In all studies, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs; 16 RCTs) or bisphosphonates (two RCTs) were used as WM co-intervention with HMs (17 types of HM, 18 RCTs). Overall, the combination of HM and WM improved the BMD score, producing better results than WM alone. In particular, when HM was used in combination with DMARDs, which were used in most studies, BMD improved by 0.04 g/cm2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.05, p < 0.001, I2 = 19%) in the lumbar spine and 0.03 g/cm2 (95% CI: 0.02-0.03, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%) in the femoral neck compared to the DMARDs alone group after treatment. In addition to BMD, bone markers and inflammatory indicators evaluated by each RCT showed significant improvement after HM plus WM treatment. In the analysis of frequently prescribed HMs, the BMD after treatment was higher by 0.04 g/cm2 (95% CI: 0.03-0.04, p < 0.001, I2 = 45%) in the Xianlinggubao-capsule plus methotrexate (MTX) group and by 0.02 g/cm2 (95% CI: 0.00-0.03, p = 0.04, I2 = 0) in the Hanbikang-tang plus MTX group compared to the MTX alone group. Conclusion: This systematic review cautiously provides evidence for the combined therapeutic effect of HM and WM for osteoporosis in patients with RA. However, well-designed, large-scale clinical trials are necessary before recommending this combination therapy for osteoporosis in patients with RA. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=331854], identifier [CRD42022331854].

Gyejibokryeong-Hwan improves recovery of injured muscles in mouse model of muscle contusion.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of Gyejibokryeong-Hwan (Guizhifuling-wan, GBH) on muscle injury in a mouse model of muscle contusion. METHODS: C57/BL6 mouse biceps femoris muscles were injured using the drop-mass method and injured animals were treated orally with GBH (50, 100, or 500 mg/kg) once a day for 7 d. Open field and treadmill running tests were performed to assess functional recovery from muscle injury. The production of pro-inflammatory cytokines was examined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and Western blotting analysis. Expression of the muscle regeneration biomarkers, myoblast determination (MyoD), myogenic factor 5 (Myf5), and smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), in the biceps femoris muscle was investigated at the protein and mRNA level by Western blotting and real time-PCR, respectively. Histological analysis was performed using hematoxylin and eosin staining. Finally, myosin heavy chain production was investigated in differentiated C2C12 myoblasts in the presence of GBH. RESULTS: GBH treatment markedly improved locomotion and running behavior. GBH significantly inhibited the secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 into the bloodstream in muscle-contused animals. The levels of MyoD, Myf5, and α-SMA protein and mRNA were significantly up-regulated by GBH in injured muscle tissue. Histological studies suggested that GBH facilitated recovery from muscle damage. However, GBH did not induce the production of myosin heavy chain in vitro. CONCLUSION: Overall, the present study suggested that GBH improves the recovery of the injured muscles in the mouse model of muscle contusion.

Electroacupuncture for post-thoracotomy pain: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Thoracotomy is a common surgical procedure used in cases such as trauma and cancer resection. It is an invasive procedure in which incisions are made in the chest wall to gain access to the chest. Therefore, it often produces intense postoperative pain. Electroacupuncture has been known for its analgesic effects in various conditions, including cases of postoperative pain. This protocol design is for a systematic review and meta-analysis to gather evidence and investigate the analgesic effects of electroacupuncture in pain after thoracotomy. METHODS: The studies for the systematic review will be searched with keywords on the following 10 databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, CNKI, KoreaMed, KMBASE, KISS, and OASIS. The search will be done without language restrictions. Only the randomized controlled trials that meet the eligibility criteria will be finally included in the study. The quality of the study will be assessed using the Cochrane Collaborations' risk-of-bias tool, and Cochrane's software RevMan 5.3 will be used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: The designed study will provide a systematic review and meta-analysis of the searched and randomized controlled trials that meet the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis will be performed with pain scores as the main outcome measure, and they may also be performed with additional outcomes. The qualitative and quantitative data synthesis is expected to provide high quality evidence to judge the pain management effect of electroacupuncture for patients who underwent thoracotomy. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this systematic review and meta-analysis will provide evidence to judge whether electroacupuncture is an effective analgesic treatment option for patients suffering with post-thoracotomy pain. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019142157.